The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Can somebody tell me what the hell Viewtiful Joe is about cos it was given 90% from Gamesmaster, please tell me what its about, i haven't a clue?!!!
Page:
Cubist wrote:
> Cyclone wrote:
> I know you didn't say it, but it's the same argument, and in context
> with GTA3 it makes it seem even more absurd.
>
> It is the same argument yes and I do think that GTA3 is ever so
> slightly pervy because of all the prostitutes. I don't see how
> reminding me of another pervy game strengthens your point? If
> anything else I think it proves my point that there are a lot of
> pervy games and I don't like playing them.
As in VJ is not 'pervy' (you must have voyeurism on the brain or something) and GTA3 is, and yet people never complain even about the level of that in GTA3, let alone a totally different and hardly voyeuristic (above the usual BEING ABLE TO SEE THE GAMEPLAY) game to VJ.
>
> Stop saying 'you tool'.
>
> No.
Yes, it is *really* lame.
>
> READ THIS:
>
> "You have no right to comment on a game as such, UNLESS you
> have
> played it"
>
> "comment on a game" I am not commenting on THE game I am
> commenting on certain aspects of the game that I believe to be
> terribly bad and I dislike. I am not commenting on the game as a
> whole just saying that if it is as bad as the things I have rated it
> on in all the other areas then it's a pretty crappy game.
>
1) You are commenting on parts of the game, consequentially THE game.
2) You haven't played it
3) You are making pointless assumptions
4) You haven't played it. Ad nauseum.....
> Well obviously, you have the right too, but nobody takes you
> seriously.
>
> I take me seriously.
Just realised I do too, at least enough to post this message. Bah, sod that.
> Cyclone wrote:
> I know you didn't say it, but it's the same argument, and in context
> with GTA3 it makes it seem even more absurd.
>
> It is the same argument yes and I do think that GTA3 is ever so
> slightly pervy because of all the prostitutes. I don't see how
> reminding me of another pervy game strengthens your point? If
> anything else I think it proves my point that there are a lot of
> pervy games and I don't like playing them.
As in VJ is not 'pervy' (you must have voyeurism on the brain or something) and GTA3 is, and yet people never complain even about the level of that in GTA3, let alone a totally different and hardly voyeuristic (above the usual BEING ABLE TO SEE THE GAMEPLAY) game to VJ.
>
> Stop saying 'you tool'.
>
> No.
Yes, it is *really* lame.
>
> READ THIS:
>
> "You have no right to comment on a game as such, UNLESS you
> have
> played it"
>
> "comment on a game" I am not commenting on THE game I am
> commenting on certain aspects of the game that I believe to be
> terribly bad and I dislike. I am not commenting on the game as a
> whole just saying that if it is as bad as the things I have rated it
> on in all the other areas then it's a pretty crappy game.
>
1) You are commenting on parts of the game, consequentially THE game.
2) You haven't played it
3) You are making pointless assumptions
4) You haven't played it. Ad nauseum.....
> Well obviously, you have the right too, but nobody takes you
> seriously.
>
> I take me seriously.
Just realised I do too, at least enough to post this message. Bah, sod that.
Cyclone wrote:
> I know you didn't say it, but it's the same argument, and in context
> with GTA3 it makes it seem even more absurd.
It is the same argument yes and I do think that GTA3 is ever so slightly pervy because of all the prostitutes. I don't see how reminding me of another pervy game strengthens your point? If anything else I think it proves my point that there are a lot of pervy games and I don't like playing them.
> Stop saying 'you tool'.
No.
> READ THIS:
>
> "You have no right to comment on a game as such, UNLESS you have
> played it"
"comment on a game" I am not commenting on THE game I am commenting on certain aspects of the game that I believe to be terribly bad and I dislike. I am not commenting on the game as a whole just saying that if it is as bad as the things I have rated it on in all the other areas then it's a pretty crappy game.
> Well obviously, you have the right too, but nobody takes you
> seriously.
I take me seriously.
> I know you didn't say it, but it's the same argument, and in context
> with GTA3 it makes it seem even more absurd.
It is the same argument yes and I do think that GTA3 is ever so slightly pervy because of all the prostitutes. I don't see how reminding me of another pervy game strengthens your point? If anything else I think it proves my point that there are a lot of pervy games and I don't like playing them.
> Stop saying 'you tool'.
No.
> READ THIS:
>
> "You have no right to comment on a game as such, UNLESS you have
> played it"
"comment on a game" I am not commenting on THE game I am commenting on certain aspects of the game that I believe to be terribly bad and I dislike. I am not commenting on the game as a whole just saying that if it is as bad as the things I have rated it on in all the other areas then it's a pretty crappy game.
> Well obviously, you have the right too, but nobody takes you
> seriously.
I take me seriously.
I know you didn't say it, but it's the same argument, and in context with GTA3 it makes it seem even more absurd.
Stop saying 'you tool'.
READ THIS:
"You have no right to comment on a game as such, UNLESS you have played it"
Well obviously, you have the right too, but nobody takes you seriously.
Stop saying 'you tool'.
READ THIS:
"You have no right to comment on a game as such, UNLESS you have played it"
Well obviously, you have the right too, but nobody takes you seriously.
I do think GTA is pervy for having prostitutes. Idiot. When did I say I didn't? You assumed I didn't and tried to put words into my mouth. Such a tool **rolls eyes**
Cyclone wrote:
> > If you haven't played the game you have no right to comment on it in
> such the way you have done.
>
>
> > If you haven't played the game you have no right to comment on it in
> such the way you have done.
>
>
So GTA isn't pervy for having prostitutes?
You obviously don't realise the nature of the game if one of your main sticking points is how much like a Power Ranger he looks.
Idiot.
You obviously don't realise the nature of the game if one of your main sticking points is how much like a Power Ranger he looks.
Idiot.
Realise? Yes. Respect? No.
As for saying every game is voyeuristic technically that comment by whoever said it is true but what I was trying to say was that watching your character from behind trees in the woods and so on just looks, sounds and feels like a pervy thing to do. Other games don't do that though...well most of them don't before you all go giving me a list of obscure game names.
As for saying every game is voyeuristic technically that comment by whoever said it is true but what I was trying to say was that watching your character from behind trees in the woods and so on just looks, sounds and feels like a pervy thing to do. Other games don't do that though...well most of them don't before you all go giving me a list of obscure game names.
Cubist wrote:
> If you want to know who the friend is then I'll tell you it's Phuzzy.
> Ask him if you don't believe me but I'm telling you it's scary how
> like Power Rangers it is. Go go mishapen freak! **rolls eyes**
Interesting.
You don't seem to realise it's a semi-homage and satire at the same time do you?
> If you want to know who the friend is then I'll tell you it's Phuzzy.
> Ask him if you don't believe me but I'm telling you it's scary how
> like Power Rangers it is. Go go mishapen freak! **rolls eyes**
Interesting.
You don't seem to realise it's a semi-homage and satire at the same time do you?
I think your comment about being a 'voyeur' summed up your argument succinctly. If thats's the case, then er, every single game is voyeuristic.............
If you haven't played the game you have no right to comment on it in such the way you have done.
Simple.
If you haven't played the game you have no right to comment on it in such the way you have done.
Simple.
Very_Metal wrote:
> it's that attitude which is killing the games industry.
> "i dislike this variation", well then it's your lucky day
> because we're bang in the middle of the pre-christmas rush of
> mediocre copycat games that needed neither inventiveness to create
> nor imagination to play. you may as well just buy 1 game, 1 movie and
> 1 cd, because surely everything else would be variant?
Didn't say i disliked variation, said I disliked that variation.
> Superted did that years beforehand.
> and did it better too! :)
debatable, but amn't debating it now.
> what about Rez or Vib Ribbon?
> seiously, if yo wrote them off for their looks then you'd be missing
> 2 of the most innovative games ever.
Never heard of Vib Ribbon, Rez is mundane in my opinion and I did actually play that game. Meh.
> "i dislike all".. ah, the joy of being 16..
> you can cut the angst with a Nirvana cd.. :)
Or Blink 182
> it's that attitude which is killing the games industry.
> "i dislike this variation", well then it's your lucky day
> because we're bang in the middle of the pre-christmas rush of
> mediocre copycat games that needed neither inventiveness to create
> nor imagination to play. you may as well just buy 1 game, 1 movie and
> 1 cd, because surely everything else would be variant?
Didn't say i disliked variation, said I disliked that variation.
> Superted did that years beforehand.
> and did it better too! :)
debatable, but amn't debating it now.
> what about Rez or Vib Ribbon?
> seiously, if yo wrote them off for their looks then you'd be missing
> 2 of the most innovative games ever.
Never heard of Vib Ribbon, Rez is mundane in my opinion and I did actually play that game. Meh.
> "i dislike all".. ah, the joy of being 16..
> you can cut the angst with a Nirvana cd.. :)
Or Blink 182
Page: