The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
1)The matrix
2)Lord of the ring
In my opinion "Lord of the Ring" has made more money than what "The Matrix" has
Anyway which one do you prefer , I think that L.o.t.R is way better than The Matrix (I am a fan of both Saga's)
> Anyone who thinks The Matrix is good needs to watch a few more decent
> films me thinks.
I really do despise stuck up "I'm a better educated movie-watcher than thou" comments like that.
Anyone who thinks The Matrix is good needs to watch a few more decent films me thinks.
> Anyway, why are you disagreeing with me? Are you saying Revolutions
> was good? That Star Wars is crap? That Indy is crap? That Back To The
> Future is crap? That the Ewoks films don't exist? Make sense, foo'!
Revolutions IS a good film, provided you don't buy into the whole "give me the answers" crap, which makes me laugh that so many people got into. As for the Ewok films, I enjoyed them. Of course, I was watching them when I was about 10-11 years old, the age-group I believe they were aimed at, but hey...
> Not 3 connecting stories, which a trilogy is.
Umm, LOTR is three books, hence a trilogy of films, yes? Star Wars (original) is also 1 story across 3 films, as is The Matrix.
> Never listen to Mojojojo, he's the kind of bloke that will try to
> convince you that The Shipping News is a good film.
------
What's The Shipping News?
Anyway, why are you disagreeing with me? Are you saying Revolutions was good? That Star Wars is crap? That Indy is crap? That Back To The Future is crap? That the Ewoks films don't exist? Make sense, foo'!
> Actually Lord of the Rings is more of 1 story split into three
> parts.
You could say the same for Matrix too.
IMO, LOTR is the best trilogy.
I guess Lord of the Rings....
Not Matrix hell no.
Actually Lord of the Rings is more of 1 story split into three parts.
Not 3 connecting stories, which a trilogy is.