The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I'm not getting all impassioned about it, because kids should be allowed and encouraged to play out and explore, but it amazed me that someone would let their kids walk alone through that particular area, when it would only take 10 minutes out of their precious schedule to make sure they got to school OK.
> Children walking in woodland - god, whatever next?
>
> I used to walk/play in woods all the time when I was a kid. It
> doesn't mean my parents were irresponsible or trailer trash.
> We shouldn't be blaming the parents for letting their kids wander,
> and we shouldn't be filling children's minds with over-the-top horror
> stories about the looming presence of the bogeyman around every
> corner.
> In fact, children should be encouraged to play in the woods - they're
> magical places when you're young.
>
> If you want to blame someone, blame those who prey on children.
My point was that it's a 5 minute walk to the school, and anything could happen in the dark, lonely woods in the middle. I'm not trying to scaremonger, but it alarmed me at the ease that some parent's let their kids run wild. I used to play in the same woods when I was little, and you're right - it was a magical place - but that doesn't mean it's a safe place to be.
I used to walk/play in woods all the time when I was a kid. It doesn't mean my parents were irresponsible or trailer trash.
We shouldn't be blaming the parents for letting their kids wander, and we shouldn't be filling children's minds with over-the-top horror stories about the looming presence of the bogeyman around every corner.
In fact, children should be encouraged to play in the woods - they're magical places when you're young.
If you want to blame someone, blame those who prey on children.
> As much as it pains me to say this, even Jade from Big Brother
> deserves the right to have a child.
No. No. No.
We have to intervene, because if we don't, we won't be able to "do it".
> Compulsory parenting qualifications.
I'm still with you on this. But the problem is: what the hell do you put on the test? How can you tell from what someone says/writes down under exam conditions that they'll be a good parent? I say just don't hand out the certificate to those who obviously will not care or are unbelievably stupid (ie Jade from Big Bruvva).
> It's the same when I'm in a shop and the security is looking at me.
Heh, me and my bro went into B&Q about 2-3 weeks ago, as soon as we walked through the door the security guard started following us. He followed us right around the shop til we left. It was quite amusing watching him try to be "discreet" we would walk down an aisle, stop and then find the security guard starting down the same aisle, then suddenly change direction and walk away.
We saw him walking out of the store the other day carrying a piece of paper, i assume it was his P45.
> "They" being the operative word. A group of them. I'd much
> rather have walked to school with a bunch of friends than be driven
> there and have to wait outside alone in the cold for 30 minutes
> before I was even allowed in.
There were two of them. Two little girls. The older one was about 8 or 9, the other one was a lot younger or a midget-child.
It's the same when I'm in a shop and the security is looking at me. I try too hard to seem to be acting normal, and end up looking as suss as a radgie with a bulging coat after leaving Kwik Save.