The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
heh - i couldn't resist the joke...
anyways - abortion. now that it's widely available, people think it's their safety net. well, what about when they DIDN'T have abortion around, eh? what if einstein was aborted? or more disastrously, Lee Evans!!!
NOOOOOOOOOOOO!
the world needs laughter...and crazy entertainers who make themselves have spasms on stage! hilarious.....
ah well, there's my narrow minded opinion...
anyways - abortion. now that it's widely available, people think it's their safety net. well, what about when they DIDN'T have abortion around, eh? what if einstein was aborted? or more disastrously, Lee Evans!!!
NOOOOOOOOOOOO!
the world needs laughter...and crazy entertainers who make themselves have spasms on stage! hilarious.....
ah well, there's my narrow minded opinion...
Page:
All in favour ?
Heh. I have to say that, on the basis of most parents, it should really be compulsory to have a license to have ANY kids...
abortion is a tricky subject - on one hand it's murder - on the other hand, it's the right thing to do.
look at China, you have to get a license to have more than one kid there. now that makes sense.
look at China, you have to get a license to have more than one kid there. now that makes sense.
Belldandy wrote:
> Think of it as a stamina test.
So you ARE a masochist then? Cos it should be painfully clear to you that I never tire of watching blinkered, parroting funadentalists making themselves look stupid. Or is it some sort of logic whereby you think "he posts a response to me every time! Never mind that each response succeeds in embarrassing me; he looks like a fool for even responding!"
Ah well; it can't be much of a test. You've even given up on trying to get yourself out of the hole you've dug yourself!
> Think of it as a stamina test.
So you ARE a masochist then? Cos it should be painfully clear to you that I never tire of watching blinkered, parroting funadentalists making themselves look stupid. Or is it some sort of logic whereby you think "he posts a response to me every time! Never mind that each response succeeds in embarrassing me; he looks like a fool for even responding!"
Ah well; it can't be much of a test. You've even given up on trying to get yourself out of the hole you've dug yourself!
Think of it as a stamina test.
Belldandy wrote:
> As usual you're right Light.
>
> "in your little teeny teeny mind"
Heheheheheheheheh...you really don't pay attention to the thread, do you? So, I'll repost this. Although if you look a little further down, you'll find it there;
> Once more, I repeat: I'm not interested in right or wrong opinions.
> I'm interested in the reasoning behind them. Something you're
> incapable of giving, aren't you Bell? Because you borrowed your
> opinions, didn't you? And you haven't actually thought about them,
> have you?
>
> Tut tut...this is the millionth time I've explained this to you, but
> you continue to look dumber and dumber by saying "You want to be
> right/change my opinion". I can only conclude that this is due
> to your stupidity, or an inability to comprehend simple
> explainations.
>
Really Bell, why do you do this to yourself? You're not doing anything than making yourself look VERY stupid. So why? Are you a masochist? Or do you actually think that you're NOT coming out of this looking like a mindless coward?
> As usual you're right Light.
>
> "in your little teeny teeny mind"
Heheheheheheheheh...you really don't pay attention to the thread, do you? So, I'll repost this. Although if you look a little further down, you'll find it there;
> Once more, I repeat: I'm not interested in right or wrong opinions.
> I'm interested in the reasoning behind them. Something you're
> incapable of giving, aren't you Bell? Because you borrowed your
> opinions, didn't you? And you haven't actually thought about them,
> have you?
>
> Tut tut...this is the millionth time I've explained this to you, but
> you continue to look dumber and dumber by saying "You want to be
> right/change my opinion". I can only conclude that this is due
> to your stupidity, or an inability to comprehend simple
> explainations.
>
Really Bell, why do you do this to yourself? You're not doing anything than making yourself look VERY stupid. So why? Are you a masochist? Or do you actually think that you're NOT coming out of this looking like a mindless coward?
As usual you're right Light.
"in your little teeny teeny mind"
"in your little teeny teeny mind"
Belldandy wrote:
>
> No, you actually made a post under the account the day you were
> banned but that had a variant of the name IB, which then changed.
> Considering I'd never seen a "Bane" on the forums before,
> and the age of the user account, it was slightly obvious. But your
> proper account had been banned anyway, and under the new name you had
> done nothing wrong, so why bother?
Ah! You're lying to save face then Bell? You're too afraid to admit that maybe you got it wrong, or that maybe your statement shouldn't have been quite as sweeping as it was?
Heheheheheheheheh. Maybe I'm just in a strange mood this week, but I've greatly enjoyed watching you lurch from prissy self-righteousness, to 'wacky' topic avoidance, to cowardly subject changing, to childish petulance, and back to prissyness, all the while imagining yourself to be causing gasps of astonishment from the gallery at your wit and brilliance.
Alas, the majority of those gasps are people trying not to laugh to obviously at you. After all, when your skull eventually absorbs the information that you've made yourself look like an asshat with minimal help, your usual reaction is to post a wailing rant and disappear for a couple of weeks. And you're far too much fun to have around at the moment!!
Bless you for your services to the Labour party (cos if anyone here was unsure about who to vote for, their minds will almost certainly have been made up at the very point you said you were a Tory), for your services to the Anti-war camp (because when YOU are the self-proclaimed cheerleader for pro-war, you actually manage to make the whole war seem even more of a disreputable land grab than it already is), and your services to the Democrat party of the USA (because your half-baked defences of Dubya, peppered as they are with lies that you haven't even bothered to think through, make even fervent Republicans think "Jesus...am I REALLY aligning myself with this witless parrot?!).
God bless you Bell; you've done more for liberal and left wing causes than I could ever have hoped to achieve!
>
> No, you actually made a post under the account the day you were
> banned but that had a variant of the name IB, which then changed.
> Considering I'd never seen a "Bane" on the forums before,
> and the age of the user account, it was slightly obvious. But your
> proper account had been banned anyway, and under the new name you had
> done nothing wrong, so why bother?
Ah! You're lying to save face then Bell? You're too afraid to admit that maybe you got it wrong, or that maybe your statement shouldn't have been quite as sweeping as it was?
Heheheheheheheheh. Maybe I'm just in a strange mood this week, but I've greatly enjoyed watching you lurch from prissy self-righteousness, to 'wacky' topic avoidance, to cowardly subject changing, to childish petulance, and back to prissyness, all the while imagining yourself to be causing gasps of astonishment from the gallery at your wit and brilliance.
Alas, the majority of those gasps are people trying not to laugh to obviously at you. After all, when your skull eventually absorbs the information that you've made yourself look like an asshat with minimal help, your usual reaction is to post a wailing rant and disappear for a couple of weeks. And you're far too much fun to have around at the moment!!
Bless you for your services to the Labour party (cos if anyone here was unsure about who to vote for, their minds will almost certainly have been made up at the very point you said you were a Tory), for your services to the Anti-war camp (because when YOU are the self-proclaimed cheerleader for pro-war, you actually manage to make the whole war seem even more of a disreputable land grab than it already is), and your services to the Democrat party of the USA (because your half-baked defences of Dubya, peppered as they are with lies that you haven't even bothered to think through, make even fervent Republicans think "Jesus...am I REALLY aligning myself with this witless parrot?!).
God bless you Bell; you've done more for liberal and left wing causes than I could ever have hoped to achieve!
Bane wrote:
> which is why it took you a week to catch on?
No, you actually made a post under the account the day you were banned but that had a variant of the name IB, which then changed. Considering I'd never seen a "Bane" on the forums before, and the age of the user account, it was slightly obvious. But your proper account had been banned anyway, and under the new name you had done nothing wrong, so why bother?
> which is why it took you a week to catch on?
No, you actually made a post under the account the day you were banned but that had a variant of the name IB, which then changed. Considering I'd never seen a "Bane" on the forums before, and the age of the user account, it was slightly obvious. But your proper account had been banned anyway, and under the new name you had done nothing wrong, so why bother?
Bane wrote:
> Belldandy wrote:
> Oh dear Light once again slips up, it was obvious from the day that
> IB's notable account was banned that Bane was indeed IB.
>
> which is why it took you a week to catch on?
Heheheheh...are you suggesting that Bell is making a blatantly and demonstratably false claim to avoid looking stupid, and making himself look far more ridiculous than he would have done had he simply admitted the truth?
For shame! You'll be suggesting he'll go beyond the point of self-parody to avoid addressing points that he has no answer for next.
You might even make the vaguely slanderous accusation that Bell has next to no mind of his own; he merely leaps into a topic with a fully formed opinion which he is incapable of defending (unless you count variations on the theme "It's right because I say so" a defense).
> Belldandy wrote:
> Oh dear Light once again slips up, it was obvious from the day that
> IB's notable account was banned that Bane was indeed IB.
>
> which is why it took you a week to catch on?
Heheheheh...are you suggesting that Bell is making a blatantly and demonstratably false claim to avoid looking stupid, and making himself look far more ridiculous than he would have done had he simply admitted the truth?
For shame! You'll be suggesting he'll go beyond the point of self-parody to avoid addressing points that he has no answer for next.
You might even make the vaguely slanderous accusation that Bell has next to no mind of his own; he merely leaps into a topic with a fully formed opinion which he is incapable of defending (unless you count variations on the theme "It's right because I say so" a defense).
Page: