The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3190934.stm
Whoops. Looks like some administration is desperate to convince the sheeple that things are a-ok!!!!
And I even posted this close to 5pm, so Bell can show me just how wrong this report is.
Whoops. Looks like some administration is desperate to convince the sheeple that things are a-ok!!!!
And I even posted this close to 5pm, so Bell can show me just how wrong this report is.
Page:
Right ok then.
I shall sit back and watch you emulate the posting style of myself.
However, once more, you seem to have missed the point entirely mon chere:
You have provided the "You smoke" material in one of your more glorious descents into rage, I can pop it if you like?
I shall sit back and watch you emulate the posting style of myself.
However, once more, you seem to have missed the point entirely mon chere:
You have provided the "You smoke" material in one of your more glorious descents into rage, I can pop it if you like?
Oh, when you finally figure this out, you will laugh as heartily as I am now.
*shakes head*
You are aware that you are mocking your original hissy-fit aren't you?
You are aware that you are mocking your original hissy-fit aren't you?
The only confusion here is that you seem to believe that you're not a STINKING COMMIE WHO SMOKES!!!
Now the attempt to prove a sense of humour...it's quite sad really.
Care to admit the confusion in the Limbaugh thread?
Care to admit the confusion in the Limbaugh thread?
*flicks to page 157 of Clear and Present Danger*
For the sake of humanity loooooook!!! Can't you see?
*throws Clancy book at Light & co
For the sake of humanity loooooook!!! Can't you see?
*throws Clancy book at Light & co
Belldandy wrote:
> pb wrote:
> Because Japan ARE doing it for the same reason, more than likely, as
> the US - Political and material gain. They aren't stupid and they
> may certainly need help sooner or later as their country falls
> further in to all sorts of problems from cashflow to an ageing
> population.
>
> Well at least someone can see that...
Hell, everyone who knows that not ONE nation in the world acts for selfless reasons can see it.
>
> Doubtful, but I'll explain my reasoning (because this is just my
> opinion);
>
> 1) It's a roadside bomb - in itself unusual.
>
> 2) It was planted in a specific place indicating the route of the US
> Convoy was known to the attackers, no way it was sheer chance and
> luck.
>
> 3) The attackers knew which vehicles the americans were in and
> instead of detonating straight away they let those specific vehicles
> come within the centre of the bomb.
>
> 4) It was a remote detonation, wires led from the roadside to a
> nearby house, that's not the standard method for most Palestinians
> groups who make more use of suicide bombers.
>
> 5) American target - whilst US citizens have been killed in
> crossfires and both Israeli and Palestinian terrorist attacks, the
> Palestinian groups have never ever specifically targetted US
> interests in the past 3 years. It only gives America more reason to
> support Israel and America more reasons why it should do so, hence
> why they don't attack Americans on purpose.
>
> 6) All known groups are denying it, usually they do not shirk away
> from anything they've done because it's pointless being a terrorist
> group if you don't claim to do anything.
Amazing what you can pick up from Tom Clancy books these days...
>
> Terrorist groups don't spring up from nowhere, hence my reasoning
> this is a splinter cell from another group(s) that is sick of not
> being able to attack US targets, or terrorists from other places who
> see it as an environment with little law and order and the chance to
> attack Zionist/Jewish/US targets with relative freedom.
>
> I believe it would be as hard for Arafat to promise to remove all
> terrorist groups as it would for, say, Ireland to remove the IRA or
> Basque Spain remove ETA (though they can prevent Batasuna from
> running as a bona fide political group). Though once militant
> factions may have been organised by the governing parties, they are
> now a completely seperate entity working for similar causes.
Yet haven't you said, in this thread, that you expect Arafat to be able to police his own people, and if he can't then he should expect all the trouble Israel can throw at him? It's almost as if you're saying that you want the Palestinians to suffer continually...
>
> Yes it would be hard, but it is inexcusable to even refuse to commit
> to trying to do so publically. In both cases I believe Arafat and
> Syria could, if they were willing to act, be given exact locations of
> training camps and suchlike - after all I doubt the US spy satellite
> imagery from the area is being dedicated to postcard photography...
Except Arafat has committed publically. Wow...in the penultimate paragraph you express understanding that Arafat can't control the militants, now you condemn him for refusing to do so...do you even read what you write?!
> pb wrote:
> Because Japan ARE doing it for the same reason, more than likely, as
> the US - Political and material gain. They aren't stupid and they
> may certainly need help sooner or later as their country falls
> further in to all sorts of problems from cashflow to an ageing
> population.
>
> Well at least someone can see that...
Hell, everyone who knows that not ONE nation in the world acts for selfless reasons can see it.
>
> Doubtful, but I'll explain my reasoning (because this is just my
> opinion);
>
> 1) It's a roadside bomb - in itself unusual.
>
> 2) It was planted in a specific place indicating the route of the US
> Convoy was known to the attackers, no way it was sheer chance and
> luck.
>
> 3) The attackers knew which vehicles the americans were in and
> instead of detonating straight away they let those specific vehicles
> come within the centre of the bomb.
>
> 4) It was a remote detonation, wires led from the roadside to a
> nearby house, that's not the standard method for most Palestinians
> groups who make more use of suicide bombers.
>
> 5) American target - whilst US citizens have been killed in
> crossfires and both Israeli and Palestinian terrorist attacks, the
> Palestinian groups have never ever specifically targetted US
> interests in the past 3 years. It only gives America more reason to
> support Israel and America more reasons why it should do so, hence
> why they don't attack Americans on purpose.
>
> 6) All known groups are denying it, usually they do not shirk away
> from anything they've done because it's pointless being a terrorist
> group if you don't claim to do anything.
Amazing what you can pick up from Tom Clancy books these days...
>
> Terrorist groups don't spring up from nowhere, hence my reasoning
> this is a splinter cell from another group(s) that is sick of not
> being able to attack US targets, or terrorists from other places who
> see it as an environment with little law and order and the chance to
> attack Zionist/Jewish/US targets with relative freedom.
>
> I believe it would be as hard for Arafat to promise to remove all
> terrorist groups as it would for, say, Ireland to remove the IRA or
> Basque Spain remove ETA (though they can prevent Batasuna from
> running as a bona fide political group). Though once militant
> factions may have been organised by the governing parties, they are
> now a completely seperate entity working for similar causes.
Yet haven't you said, in this thread, that you expect Arafat to be able to police his own people, and if he can't then he should expect all the trouble Israel can throw at him? It's almost as if you're saying that you want the Palestinians to suffer continually...
>
> Yes it would be hard, but it is inexcusable to even refuse to commit
> to trying to do so publically. In both cases I believe Arafat and
> Syria could, if they were willing to act, be given exact locations of
> training camps and suchlike - after all I doubt the US spy satellite
> imagery from the area is being dedicated to postcard photography...
Except Arafat has committed publically. Wow...in the penultimate paragraph you express understanding that Arafat can't control the militants, now you condemn him for refusing to do so...do you even read what you write?!
Bellghost wrote:
> Lacking a sense of humour/sarcasm/irony that day were we ?
---
Ah, so this is the "I was only joking" defence is it?
HAHAHAHAHA
I got my humour at my angriest time than you have doing handstands wearing your big clown shoes and "big book of jokes" book.
Christ, you can't even fish properly.
> Lacking a sense of humour/sarcasm/irony that day were we ?
---
Ah, so this is the "I was only joking" defence is it?
HAHAHAHAHA
I got my humour at my angriest time than you have doing handstands wearing your big clown shoes and "big book of jokes" book.
Christ, you can't even fish properly.
Goatboy wrote:
> I would just like to remind Belldandy of his staunch political and
> moral beliefs as of Monday of this week:
>
> Belldandy wrote:
> Yes indeed it does have a Foreign Policy: Disagree with us and we'll
> invade\sanction\politically cripple you\send the CIA to topple you.
> Agree with us and we'll buy your stuff and sell shiny new stuff to
> you, and occasionaly ignore you anyway.
> I would just like to remind Belldandy of his staunch political and
> moral beliefs as of Monday of this week:
>
> Belldandy wrote:
> Yes indeed it does have a Foreign Policy: Disagree with us and we'll
> invade\sanction\politically cripple you\send the CIA to topple you.
> Agree with us and we'll buy your stuff and sell shiny new stuff to
> you, and occasionaly ignore you anyway.
Lacking a sense of humour/sarcasm/irony that day were we ?
Page: