The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/ international/story/0,3604,1060907,00.html
Mwah ha ha ha haaaa! The darling of the American right is exposed as a fallible human being. I could go on about this, but instead
I'll paste something written by a friend on another web-board; it says it all.
: Oh s**t... the irony's just too great here... this is better than when Bill Bennett was found out to be a compulsive gambler. Rush "f**king" Limbaugh, the mouth of the right, the moralizer's moralizer, admitting to his vast audience of mouth breathing retarded sheep that he is indeed addicted to drugs.
: After I take in a deep breath and delight in the pure glee afforded by the moment, I detect a fire growing inside me, the beginnings of a real rage even. Limbaugh, in his statement (I'll supply the link), takes "full responsibility" for his actions and pledges that, immediately following the broadcast, he will check himself into a 30 day treatment center.
: Ahhhh... my ventricles are shredded at the thought of poor Rush forking out thousands of dollars to go to some post treatment center where he'll have to face up to his demons, undoubtably in a bucolic setting during group therapy. No doubt that he will be surrounded by other rich or upper middle class drug addicts, white, professional, able to enter back into their ordered little worlds once this unfortunate episode is over. It will be as if it never happened.
: But how would Rush judge himself? Fortunately, as the nation's #1 reactionary blabbermouth, he has a mountain of material on the subject. In fact, on many occasions, Rush used his show as a bully pulpit to PUSH THE WAR ON DRUGS. Let's see what he has to say:
: "I'm appalled at people who simply want to look at all this abhorrent behavior and say people are going to do drugs anyway let's legalize it. It's a dumb idea. It's a rotten idea and those who are for it are purely 100 percent selfish."
: -- Rush Limbaugh show, Dec 9, 1993
: "If(Surgeon General Jocelyn Elders) wants to legalize drugs, send the people who want to do drugs to London and Zurich, and let's be rid of them.
: -- Rush Limbaugh show, Dec 9, 1993
: "There's nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.
: "What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
: -- Rush Limbaugh show, Oct. 5, 1995
: Well, it seems that Rush favors the lock-em-up and throw away the key approach. Seeing as how he has admitted to illegal using drugs (Oxycontin, for God's sake--Hillbilly Heroin), and is under investigation for ILLEGALLY PROCURING THEM, wouldn't it be absolute hypocrisy of the brightest stripe if he were do anything but turn himself in, supplicate himself before the judge and BEG FOR THE MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE? Beg, piggieman, beg.
: I want to see Rush housed in Rykers Island with all the crackheads. I want to see him serving time at Pelican Bay with Mexicans who got caught with a trunk full of pot and are now doing 20 years, HARD TIME. I want to see him with an apple in his mouth while getting assraped by the biggest, baddest prisoner on the block. I want to see him beaten up, peed on, a steamy pile of feces glistening on his chest. To hell with him. Throw him to the wolves. After all, he's one of the chief architects of their pen.
Mwah ha ha ha haaaa! The darling of the American right is exposed as a fallible human being. I could go on about this, but instead
I'll paste something written by a friend on another web-board; it says it all.
: Oh s**t... the irony's just too great here... this is better than when Bill Bennett was found out to be a compulsive gambler. Rush "f**king" Limbaugh, the mouth of the right, the moralizer's moralizer, admitting to his vast audience of mouth breathing retarded sheep that he is indeed addicted to drugs.
: After I take in a deep breath and delight in the pure glee afforded by the moment, I detect a fire growing inside me, the beginnings of a real rage even. Limbaugh, in his statement (I'll supply the link), takes "full responsibility" for his actions and pledges that, immediately following the broadcast, he will check himself into a 30 day treatment center.
: Ahhhh... my ventricles are shredded at the thought of poor Rush forking out thousands of dollars to go to some post treatment center where he'll have to face up to his demons, undoubtably in a bucolic setting during group therapy. No doubt that he will be surrounded by other rich or upper middle class drug addicts, white, professional, able to enter back into their ordered little worlds once this unfortunate episode is over. It will be as if it never happened.
: But how would Rush judge himself? Fortunately, as the nation's #1 reactionary blabbermouth, he has a mountain of material on the subject. In fact, on many occasions, Rush used his show as a bully pulpit to PUSH THE WAR ON DRUGS. Let's see what he has to say:
: "I'm appalled at people who simply want to look at all this abhorrent behavior and say people are going to do drugs anyway let's legalize it. It's a dumb idea. It's a rotten idea and those who are for it are purely 100 percent selfish."
: -- Rush Limbaugh show, Dec 9, 1993
: "If(Surgeon General Jocelyn Elders) wants to legalize drugs, send the people who want to do drugs to London and Zurich, and let's be rid of them.
: -- Rush Limbaugh show, Dec 9, 1993
: "There's nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.
: "What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
: -- Rush Limbaugh show, Oct. 5, 1995
: Well, it seems that Rush favors the lock-em-up and throw away the key approach. Seeing as how he has admitted to illegal using drugs (Oxycontin, for God's sake--Hillbilly Heroin), and is under investigation for ILLEGALLY PROCURING THEM, wouldn't it be absolute hypocrisy of the brightest stripe if he were do anything but turn himself in, supplicate himself before the judge and BEG FOR THE MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE? Beg, piggieman, beg.
: I want to see Rush housed in Rykers Island with all the crackheads. I want to see him serving time at Pelican Bay with Mexicans who got caught with a trunk full of pot and are now doing 20 years, HARD TIME. I want to see him with an apple in his mouth while getting assraped by the biggest, baddest prisoner on the block. I want to see him beaten up, peed on, a steamy pile of feces glistening on his chest. To hell with him. Throw him to the wolves. After all, he's one of the chief architects of their pen.
Page:
unknown_kernel's post still rules.
I'll pop it
I'll pop it
I believe we've seen this stratagem before. If the going gets tough:
1: Don't post for a few hours.
2: Say everyone else is predictable.
3: Say the whole reason you did it in the first place was to get a reaction.
4: "Goodbye cruel world" - leave forever, and, of course, by forever I mean two weeks max.
Trouble is, it doesn't always work, does it Belldandy? This topic is an example:
"Rush Limbaugh, the politician,"
"Hang on, he isn't a politician at all. He has a radio show"
"I only did it to get a reaction"
"What?"
It just doesn't work. Just own up, admit that you didn't know who Limbaugh was, or indeed didn't understand the opening post at all, and know one will think any worse of you. In fact, I think you'd go up in just about everyone's estimations.
But mindlessly quoting posts of others? I can't even see what you're trying to achieve there. It's not as if it even makes people angry, it only serves to make them realise that they're arguing with a fool so they stop quicker. Or maybe that's your aim? Insanity plea?
1: Don't post for a few hours.
2: Say everyone else is predictable.
3: Say the whole reason you did it in the first place was to get a reaction.
4: "Goodbye cruel world" - leave forever, and, of course, by forever I mean two weeks max.
Trouble is, it doesn't always work, does it Belldandy? This topic is an example:
"Rush Limbaugh, the politician,"
"Hang on, he isn't a politician at all. He has a radio show"
"I only did it to get a reaction"
"What?"
It just doesn't work. Just own up, admit that you didn't know who Limbaugh was, or indeed didn't understand the opening post at all, and know one will think any worse of you. In fact, I think you'd go up in just about everyone's estimations.
But mindlessly quoting posts of others? I can't even see what you're trying to achieve there. It's not as if it even makes people angry, it only serves to make them realise that they're arguing with a fool so they stop quicker. Or maybe that's your aim? Insanity plea?
Oh wait, I get it, Bell has taken to simply quoting posts and adding nothing in an attemp to rile and infuriate.
Not realising, however, that far from cause any frustration, simply shines a million-watt searchlight on exactly how seriosly you should be taken.
You don't got an answer do you? You simply cannot say "Yeah I didn't understand" so you run away.
*points and laughs at Belldandy*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
And I await your post-5pm quoteapalooza.
Not realising, however, that far from cause any frustration, simply shines a million-watt searchlight on exactly how seriosly you should be taken.
You don't got an answer do you? You simply cannot say "Yeah I didn't understand" so you run away.
*points and laughs at Belldandy*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
And I await your post-5pm quoteapalooza.
Belldandy wrote:
>
> How easy are you ? As I said in the other topic, predictable to a
> fault.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!
What a simpering coward you are, dear boy. Once again, you try to provoke an angry reaction in the hope that no-one will notice that you've been shown as utterly wrong, yet you can't admit it.
How easy am I? Well...as you're the one who keeps filling his nappy and running away screaming, shouldn't I be asking the same question of you?
>
> How easy are you ? As I said in the other topic, predictable to a
> fault.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!
What a simpering coward you are, dear boy. Once again, you try to provoke an angry reaction in the hope that no-one will notice that you've been shown as utterly wrong, yet you can't admit it.
How easy am I? Well...as you're the one who keeps filling his nappy and running away screaming, shouldn't I be asking the same question of you?
The point Belldandy, the point - are you such a coward you can't admit that you were totally wrong on the subject, on many points? Damn man, I try to restrain myself at times but this thread takes the biscuit.
Goatboy wrote:
> Belldandy wrote:
> How easy are you ? As I said in the other topic, predictable to a
> fault.
> --
>
> Yet choosing to pretend not to see each and every post where it has
> been pointed out that you completely failed to understand what the
> point of this topic was about.
> Again.
>
> *points and laughs*
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> Belldandy wrote:
> How easy are you ? As I said in the other topic, predictable to a
> fault.
> --
>
> Yet choosing to pretend not to see each and every post where it has
> been pointed out that you completely failed to understand what the
> point of this topic was about.
> Again.
>
> *points and laughs*
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Belldandy wrote:
> How easy are you ? As I said in the other topic, predictable to a
> fault.
--
Yet choosing to pretend not to see each and every post where it has been pointed out that you completely failed to understand what the point of this topic was about.
Again.
*points and laughs*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> How easy are you ? As I said in the other topic, predictable to a
> fault.
--
Yet choosing to pretend not to see each and every post where it has been pointed out that you completely failed to understand what the point of this topic was about.
Again.
*points and laughs*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Light wrote:
> Belldandy wrote:
> Goatboy wrote:
> Light is not calling for Rush Limbaugh to be hung, drawn and
> quartered for being a drug addict.
> Light is enjoying the downfall of a right-wing hatemonger who has
> been discovered committing exactly the same sort of transgressions
> that he once railed against.
>
> Light wrote:
> >: I want to see Rush housed in Rykers Island with all the
> crackheads. I >want to see him serving time at Pelican Bay with
> Mexicans who got caught >with a trunk full of pot and are now
> doing 20 years, HARD TIME. I want >to see him with an apple in
> his
> mouth while getting assraped by the >biggest, baddest prisoner on
> the block. I want to see him beaten up, >peed on, a steamy pile
> of
> feces glistening on his chest. To hell with >him. Throw him to
> the
> wolves. After all, he's one of the chief >architects of their
> pen.
>
>
> Uh huh....the two statements seem to contradict themselves. And
> again
> I find it funny that someone who is supposed to be a
> lawyer/solicitor
> such as Light - whose job it is to operate within the law - and who
> has admitted to using drugs himself, is berating another person for
> likewise. Limbaugh's policy dictated the law, as would Light's work
> in his job, but, like Light, he did not stay within the law. Except
> unlike Light, who wants drugs legalised, he continued to try and
> stop
> their spread and effects.
>
> It's an illness he privately has. Since when did a politician have
> to
> make his private life policy ? This does not undermine his opinions,
> more it shows the sheer state we found ourselves in over drugs
>
> Firstly: He's not a politician; he's a talk show host. Which shows
> your ignorance of this matter.
>
> Secondly: As has been said, I'm not berating him for drug use, but
> the hypocrisy; he condemns drug use in others having used them
> himself. This was pointed out to you by Blank and GB, but you have
> decided to ignore that. Will you please acknowledge that point.
>
> Thirdly: His work, nor mine, dictate the law. He didn't try to stop
> their spread; he merely condemned them on his talk show. Tell me
> Bell, do you actually know who Rush is and what he does?!
>
> Finally: You may note that I didn't write this; a friend did. I
> acknowledge that at the beginning. You, being an ignorant coward,
> clearly failed to notice that.
>
> Any response to make Bell?
How easy are you ? As I said in the other topic, predictable to a fault.
> Belldandy wrote:
> Goatboy wrote:
> Light is not calling for Rush Limbaugh to be hung, drawn and
> quartered for being a drug addict.
> Light is enjoying the downfall of a right-wing hatemonger who has
> been discovered committing exactly the same sort of transgressions
> that he once railed against.
>
> Light wrote:
> >: I want to see Rush housed in Rykers Island with all the
> crackheads. I >want to see him serving time at Pelican Bay with
> Mexicans who got caught >with a trunk full of pot and are now
> doing 20 years, HARD TIME. I want >to see him with an apple in
> his
> mouth while getting assraped by the >biggest, baddest prisoner on
> the block. I want to see him beaten up, >peed on, a steamy pile
> of
> feces glistening on his chest. To hell with >him. Throw him to
> the
> wolves. After all, he's one of the chief >architects of their
> pen.
>
>
> Uh huh....the two statements seem to contradict themselves. And
> again
> I find it funny that someone who is supposed to be a
> lawyer/solicitor
> such as Light - whose job it is to operate within the law - and who
> has admitted to using drugs himself, is berating another person for
> likewise. Limbaugh's policy dictated the law, as would Light's work
> in his job, but, like Light, he did not stay within the law. Except
> unlike Light, who wants drugs legalised, he continued to try and
> stop
> their spread and effects.
>
> It's an illness he privately has. Since when did a politician have
> to
> make his private life policy ? This does not undermine his opinions,
> more it shows the sheer state we found ourselves in over drugs
>
> Firstly: He's not a politician; he's a talk show host. Which shows
> your ignorance of this matter.
>
> Secondly: As has been said, I'm not berating him for drug use, but
> the hypocrisy; he condemns drug use in others having used them
> himself. This was pointed out to you by Blank and GB, but you have
> decided to ignore that. Will you please acknowledge that point.
>
> Thirdly: His work, nor mine, dictate the law. He didn't try to stop
> their spread; he merely condemned them on his talk show. Tell me
> Bell, do you actually know who Rush is and what he does?!
>
> Finally: You may note that I didn't write this; a friend did. I
> acknowledge that at the beginning. You, being an ignorant coward,
> clearly failed to notice that.
>
> Any response to make Bell?
How easy are you ? As I said in the other topic, predictable to a fault.
Only 40 mins or so before Bell stops lurking and posting in Xbox forum to refute, deny, whine and argue in Life
Tick-tock tick-tock
Tick-tock tick-tock
Belldandy wrote:
> *ponders how long he can continue to purposely inspire furious reply
> posts from other people*
---
Bell proven wrong but unable to admit it shocker!
Footage at eleven...
*points and laughs*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You stupid, insipid coward. You can't even admit that you were wrong here can you?
Light is highlighting the hypocrisy of Limbaugh by using a post made by somebody else on another site. But regardless of where it came from, even if it were his own words, there is no wish to see Limbaugh thrown in prison for being a drug addict.
For hypocrisy, yes.
But you, Bell, are too stupid to realise that. And when you do, you yank your standard "I wrote it on purpose!!" excuse out of your clenched ass and skulk off to post when the nasty men have gone home.
You have zero intelligence, shame or anything approaching a legitimate thought rolling around your head do you? It's all episodes of Jag and Bush Jr porno reels.
> *ponders how long he can continue to purposely inspire furious reply
> posts from other people*
---
Bell proven wrong but unable to admit it shocker!
Footage at eleven...
*points and laughs*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You stupid, insipid coward. You can't even admit that you were wrong here can you?
Light is highlighting the hypocrisy of Limbaugh by using a post made by somebody else on another site. But regardless of where it came from, even if it were his own words, there is no wish to see Limbaugh thrown in prison for being a drug addict.
For hypocrisy, yes.
But you, Bell, are too stupid to realise that. And when you do, you yank your standard "I wrote it on purpose!!" excuse out of your clenched ass and skulk off to post when the nasty men have gone home.
You have zero intelligence, shame or anything approaching a legitimate thought rolling around your head do you? It's all episodes of Jag and Bush Jr porno reels.
Page: