The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Okay, here's the deal:
You can bring one person back from the dead.
You can kill any living person on the planet.
The entire world would be informed of your decisions.
Go for it.
Do you pick a lost family member making yourself happy but risk being seen as slightly selfish? Or do you pick someone the entire world would like to see back? Someone in power? An entertainer - Elvis, or John Lennon perhaps? This person would be restored in the state they were in when they died, so they wouldn't have aged at all.
And who would you kill? Saddam Hussein? George Bush? Justin Timberlake? Remember, just because you deem someone 'evil' doesn't mean everyone else does. Removing Saddam Hussein could cause an international uproar. Killing George Bush would no doubt cause a few raised eyebrows. Timberlake's demise would ensure you never ever got laid ever again. Perhaps not as easy as it sounds.
So - one resurrected, one put in the ground.
Who is it to be?
You can bring one person back from the dead.
You can kill any living person on the planet.
The entire world would be informed of your decisions.
Go for it.
Do you pick a lost family member making yourself happy but risk being seen as slightly selfish? Or do you pick someone the entire world would like to see back? Someone in power? An entertainer - Elvis, or John Lennon perhaps? This person would be restored in the state they were in when they died, so they wouldn't have aged at all.
And who would you kill? Saddam Hussein? George Bush? Justin Timberlake? Remember, just because you deem someone 'evil' doesn't mean everyone else does. Removing Saddam Hussein could cause an international uproar. Killing George Bush would no doubt cause a few raised eyebrows. Timberlake's demise would ensure you never ever got laid ever again. Perhaps not as easy as it sounds.
So - one resurrected, one put in the ground.
Who is it to be?
Page:
This thread should be retitled "Freudian Field Day".
So, let me just clarify this. I'm a suspected manflesh fetishist with a love for neoprene and moustachios, and you're surfing the web in search of images of men in erotic neoprene outfits?
I've seen websites that would beg to differ. Just dont be sticking oranges into your mouth and demanding to be "roasted", else you're not welcome back here.
I'm not dismissing Solaris, merely pointing out that I thought the only decent moment in the film is where Clooney, recently re-united with his dead wife, promptly dumps said wife into the first escape pod he comes across and launches her off into the unforgiving darkness of space.
And if you've ever worn a wetsuit, Goatboy, you'll realise just how non-erotic it is.
And if you've ever worn a wetsuit, Goatboy, you'll realise just how non-erotic it is.
Yes it is.
Your dismissal of Solaris, and your stated yearning for the original Russian version clearly indicates a lusty want for manflesh.
As does your porntrooper fetish, and your desire to splash about in the Aegean sea with other mustachioed men in neoprene wetsuits.
The signs are all there...
Your dismissal of Solaris, and your stated yearning for the original Russian version clearly indicates a lusty want for manflesh.
As does your porntrooper fetish, and your desire to splash about in the Aegean sea with other mustachioed men in neoprene wetsuits.
The signs are all there...
Maybe you tune in just for the rippling man muscles, and deep, throaty voices dripping with virility, but that's just not my bag baby.
But Chuck just oozes macho heartiness!
No, I get about three minutes into the poor acting, awful score, lacklustre script and directing, and I switch over and watch something sensible.
Just the shirtless, shooty bits right?
I've never watched the entirety of a Chuck Norris film.
Page: