The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
In a modern society where women have equal right to men in the work place, voting and all that sort of thing, does it make it acceptable for a man to hit a woman?
What do you think?
What do you think?
Page:
I am not saying i beat girls or anything. Merely if it was a life threatening situation and you were being beaten to death by a girl you would be allowed to lash out. Or a situation along those lines, you know what i mean.
I can understand what some of you are saying.
But for me, hitting a woman just isn’t right. It’s the way I’ve been brought up. Women are naturally weaker. No doubt a woman hitting a man is wrong, and they could do some damage. But most men would do more damage to a woman if they lashed out.
When you’re in the mental state that causes you to hit a woman, I imagine that your body is going to be full of hormones, adrenalin would be coursing through your body and therefore you may not realise just how hard you are lashing out.
I really don’t know what kind of a situation it would have to be for a man to hit a woman, or vice-versa.
I truly hope if a woman ever hit me that I would not hit them back. I also hope that I would have the sense to leave that person.
But for me, hitting a woman just isn’t right. It’s the way I’ve been brought up. Women are naturally weaker. No doubt a woman hitting a man is wrong, and they could do some damage. But most men would do more damage to a woman if they lashed out.
When you’re in the mental state that causes you to hit a woman, I imagine that your body is going to be full of hormones, adrenalin would be coursing through your body and therefore you may not realise just how hard you are lashing out.
I really don’t know what kind of a situation it would have to be for a man to hit a woman, or vice-versa.
I truly hope if a woman ever hit me that I would not hit them back. I also hope that I would have the sense to leave that person.
Alec wrote:
> cookie monster wrote:
> But still getting layed into by a woman is just not on.
>
> Get them in a headlock.
>
> I'm not saying we should go round beating them to a pulp. Merely
> suggesting that if they hit us we should be *allowed* to hit them
> back.
Thats what im saying.
> cookie monster wrote:
> But still getting layed into by a woman is just not on.
>
> Get them in a headlock.
>
> I'm not saying we should go round beating them to a pulp. Merely
> suggesting that if they hit us we should be *allowed* to hit them
> back.
Thats what im saying.
cookie monster wrote:
> But still getting layed into by a woman is just not on.
>
> Get them in a headlock.
I'm not saying we should go round beating them to a pulp. Merely suggesting that if they hit us we should be *allowed* to hit them back.
> But still getting layed into by a woman is just not on.
>
> Get them in a headlock.
I'm not saying we should go round beating them to a pulp. Merely suggesting that if they hit us we should be *allowed* to hit them back.
CGJ wrote:
> How rude.But still, people complain about sexism.
Whats wrong with being sexy?
> How rude.But still, people complain about sexism.
Whats wrong with being sexy?
Alec wrote:
> Pfft but half of them are bleedin' body builders.
*dies*
> Pfft but half of them are bleedin' body builders.
*dies*
But still getting layed into by a woman is just not on.
Get them in a headlock.
Get them in a headlock.
Pfft but half of them are bleedin' body builders. Ok so maybe it is true but there is nt the huge difference now that there was say 100 years ago when the shmuk of and idea was brought into practice.
Yeah... Women are naturally weaker than men, no questions.
Alec wrote:And all this 'men are stronger than women' is bollok$ nowadays.
Um, no it isn't.
Um, no it isn't.
Page: