The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
In the end the case was settled out of court for a mere $2,000...
Mere? This is crap... I know some artists are dead against downloading music but I also know many bands don't give a s**t and offer downloadable songs from their very own website...
If more bands did that the better I'd say... beat the money obsessed system!
> That's only $2 a CD!!
>
> She should have got the full $150,000,000
>
$150,000 actually. Still rediculous to claim that they did the industry $150,000 worth of damage by downloding a few songs that wouldn't have been bought anyway.
For 1000 songs, that's 150,000,000.
So, HAH.
> That's only $2 a CD!!
>
> She should have got the full $150,000,000
There's no way a thousand Christina Agularia/Britney/S-ClubX/etc songs are worth $150,000,000. So you're wrong. She shouldn't have got the full $150,000,000. :P
I hear she's making quite a lot of money off it actually, I know the $2,000 has been covered by donations from a p2p community (or something) and a lot more donations have been flooding her way.
Can't find a link to that, but here's one on something related http://zeropaid.com/news/articles/auto/09112003i.php
Nice to see not all the artists agree with the RIAA gestapo tactics, as someone put it.
> No way would i buy albums just to listen to certain songs most of
> them have CRAP tracks on them.
That really sums up the problem with the music industry. The CRAPness.
> Der Nazi wrote:
> I only buy
> albums I can't find on the net.
>
> Aren't you a loyal and supportive fan?
Of Texas, Metallica, Nirvana, Black Sabbath, Rob Zombie and The Offspring. It's just the fact it'll cost about 34p to compile a CD at home. (Cost of blank CD and phone bill)