The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/ 0,,30000-12752414,00.html
Hilary Clinton possibly going to enter the race for the 2004 elections ? I have a feeling she will, and I have a feeling she 'could' win if she does. If Sky's report is accurate , then a 37-48% rating with Democrats is good, 'cause once the candidates are narrowed down then that can only increase.
It'd certainly be interesting to see what a woman in charge of the USA would be like, and her only real (hopefully) skeleton in the closet has already been aired when her husband fell from office.
Despite Clinton's faults, he wasn't a bad man and, as Goat Boy made reference to in another post, it was certainly a better time for the USA and the world when he was in power. The Monica Lewinsky thing was stupid, because when you see the amount of money used by Republicans to unearth it then you see that very few people on the planet could stand up to that much scrutiny and come out clean.
If she runs for it, then I'd *possibly* be hoping she wins.
Hilary Clinton possibly going to enter the race for the 2004 elections ? I have a feeling she will, and I have a feeling she 'could' win if she does. If Sky's report is accurate , then a 37-48% rating with Democrats is good, 'cause once the candidates are narrowed down then that can only increase.
It'd certainly be interesting to see what a woman in charge of the USA would be like, and her only real (hopefully) skeleton in the closet has already been aired when her husband fell from office.
Despite Clinton's faults, he wasn't a bad man and, as Goat Boy made reference to in another post, it was certainly a better time for the USA and the world when he was in power. The Monica Lewinsky thing was stupid, because when you see the amount of money used by Republicans to unearth it then you see that very few people on the planet could stand up to that much scrutiny and come out clean.
If she runs for it, then I'd *possibly* be hoping she wins.
Page:
Poorly phrased, I'll rephrase; I don't care for your advice.
Belldandy wrote:
> And I'm saying I don't need advice. I don't mind debating topics with
> anyone on anything, within reason, but I'm just not interested in
> debating how people post, and that kind of thing.
You don't NEED any advice? Ah well then, my apologies; I didn't realise that you already knew everything that there possibly was to know about anything.
> And I'm saying I don't need advice. I don't mind debating topics with
> anyone on anything, within reason, but I'm just not interested in
> debating how people post, and that kind of thing.
You don't NEED any advice? Ah well then, my apologies; I didn't realise that you already knew everything that there possibly was to know about anything.
And I'm saying I don't need advice. I don't mind debating topics with anyone on anything, within reason, but I'm just not interested in debating how people post, and that kind of thing.
Belldandy wrote:
> But there is only you and me even posting here now Light, a common
> occurrence when you start...
Indeed so. But when you posted that comment that I pasted into my previous post, there were more than just you and I posting. So you could say that in fact it was you who had started to change the subject.
And, as your above response has no relevance to my previous post, one could easily say that you are again trying to change the subject; the subject being (rather pleasingly) that you yourself are one of the worst offenders for deviating from a topic.
Anyway, I stand by the point I've made; that you're only complaining about changing the subject because you don't like people disagreeing with you. If there were any merit to your complaint, you wouldn't change the subject so often yourself.
Once again, I'll try and stress; this isn't having a go. I'm making an observation and offering honest advice, and I'm not entirely sure why you feel the need to be so defensive.
> But there is only you and me even posting here now Light, a common
> occurrence when you start...
Indeed so. But when you posted that comment that I pasted into my previous post, there were more than just you and I posting. So you could say that in fact it was you who had started to change the subject.
And, as your above response has no relevance to my previous post, one could easily say that you are again trying to change the subject; the subject being (rather pleasingly) that you yourself are one of the worst offenders for deviating from a topic.
Anyway, I stand by the point I've made; that you're only complaining about changing the subject because you don't like people disagreeing with you. If there were any merit to your complaint, you wouldn't change the subject so often yourself.
Once again, I'll try and stress; this isn't having a go. I'm making an observation and offering honest advice, and I'm not entirely sure why you feel the need to be so defensive.
But there is only you and me even posting here now Light, a common occurrence when you start...
Belldandy wrote:
> And again, no remote relevance to a topic....(ironically this reply
> isn't either).
*L* Tell you what Bell; explain what relevance this;
>Belldandy wrote:
>Oh dear Light's off on his high horse again. Listen Light, it's not my >fault if you think what I type implies anything, it's yours. In my opinion >a few power cuts will not bring down Bush, nor Blair, nor anyone for that >matter because only morons would believe a change of administration stops >power cuts, and all those people probably don't vote.
>If you think I sound arrogant then that's your problem and not mine, and >if I were you I'd take a look at some of your own posts because from >here, and from what IB wrote I'm not the only one, many of your posts are >sounding pretty arrogant as you try to belittle people. And seeing as you >have it in for Tom Clancy novels, post a few of your authors up here and > I guarantee I can do a similar hatchet job.
has to the thread. (incidentally, I rather like Clancy. I just don't live my life according to his novels)
As I've already said, you and everyone else here are guilty of deviating from the topic of a thread. To complain about it now, expecially as you're only complaining about it in threads where you're being contradicted, smacks of cowardice on your part.
> And again, no remote relevance to a topic....(ironically this reply
> isn't either).
*L* Tell you what Bell; explain what relevance this;
>Belldandy wrote:
>Oh dear Light's off on his high horse again. Listen Light, it's not my >fault if you think what I type implies anything, it's yours. In my opinion >a few power cuts will not bring down Bush, nor Blair, nor anyone for that >matter because only morons would believe a change of administration stops >power cuts, and all those people probably don't vote.
>If you think I sound arrogant then that's your problem and not mine, and >if I were you I'd take a look at some of your own posts because from >here, and from what IB wrote I'm not the only one, many of your posts are >sounding pretty arrogant as you try to belittle people. And seeing as you >have it in for Tom Clancy novels, post a few of your authors up here and > I guarantee I can do a similar hatchet job.
has to the thread. (incidentally, I rather like Clancy. I just don't live my life according to his novels)
As I've already said, you and everyone else here are guilty of deviating from the topic of a thread. To complain about it now, expecially as you're only complaining about it in threads where you're being contradicted, smacks of cowardice on your part.
And again, no remote relevance to a topic....(ironically this reply isn't either).
Belldandy wrote:
> I don't care about arguing what you think of me Light, post about an
> actual topic and I'll reply, but just arguing about how people post
> is boring, and no one but the people involved find it interesting.
I'm not arguing; just commenting. But as I say, if you want to dismiss all comments as criticism...~shrugs~ Your life, and your problem.
> I don't care about arguing what you think of me Light, post about an
> actual topic and I'll reply, but just arguing about how people post
> is boring, and no one but the people involved find it interesting.
I'm not arguing; just commenting. But as I say, if you want to dismiss all comments as criticism...~shrugs~ Your life, and your problem.
I don't care about arguing what you think of me Light, post about an actual topic and I'll reply, but just arguing about how people post is boring, and no one but the people involved find it interesting.
Ah well. Fair enough Bell. I've tried to give some honest advice. Nice to see you taking it contrary to the spirit intended.
Page: