The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I am starting to make webpages for companies, and i was wondering if any of you goons know how much i should charge.
Any one know?
Any one know?
Page:
The more you go into that site, the more stuff there is!
User logins, search, LOADS of pages...
User logins, search, LOADS of pages...
Hey phi11ip, i werent critizising the website, and i acually said that, i like the site, its very professional, all i was saying is that 60,000 is a hell of a lot of money, dont you agree, im not saying he didnt deserve it or the site is crap, i am saying the people paying could of got it for less. Alright??!
You've failed the resolution test in flying colours. Take into account that 800x600 is still the most popular resolution.
Apart from that it looks nice.
Apart from that it looks nice.
OK can someone please tell me how crap this site is I've just made for these people...
www.disillusioned-ones.co.uk
www.disillusioned-ones.co.uk
£60,000, how long did that site take you from stsrt to finish ?
Go me.
Chad Niga wrote:
> £60,000 for that??!?!?!
>
> I am looking at the right page arent I ?? because that is a very
> simple page!!
>
> Who ever paid you that must be very dumb or very despirite.
>
> Im not saying its crap, because its good, and excellent you managed
> to get that much money, but they did pay alot!!
It's not a web page, it's a web site.
It looks basic but then what else can be put onto it?
Try clicking some of the links and looking around. There's a search option which would be complicated enough, the layout is presented well and look how when you resize your browser to mimic different resolutions, the whole page is still laid out perfectly. It's easy to make a site but different resolutions can really make things complicated.
There's a lot more work gone into that than you'd think, and considering you'd just owned up to using a Homestead mailer, I think you should hide away before he sees this!
Any idiot can get a copy of Dreamweaver and make a site look presentable but that's the easy bit. You try to make a site that has search aspects to start with. You'll be there a looooooooooong time.
Basic as it may seem, that site has a LOT of stuff to it...
> £60,000 for that??!?!?!
>
> I am looking at the right page arent I ?? because that is a very
> simple page!!
>
> Who ever paid you that must be very dumb or very despirite.
>
> Im not saying its crap, because its good, and excellent you managed
> to get that much money, but they did pay alot!!
It's not a web page, it's a web site.
It looks basic but then what else can be put onto it?
Try clicking some of the links and looking around. There's a search option which would be complicated enough, the layout is presented well and look how when you resize your browser to mimic different resolutions, the whole page is still laid out perfectly. It's easy to make a site but different resolutions can really make things complicated.
There's a lot more work gone into that than you'd think, and considering you'd just owned up to using a Homestead mailer, I think you should hide away before he sees this!
Any idiot can get a copy of Dreamweaver and make a site look presentable but that's the easy bit. You try to make a site that has search aspects to start with. You'll be there a looooooooooong time.
Basic as it may seem, that site has a LOT of stuff to it...
Chad Niga wrote:
> £60,000 for that??!?!?!
>
> I am looking at the right page arent I ?? because that is a very
> simple page!!
>
> Who ever paid you that must be very dumb or very despirite.
>
> Im not saying its crap, because its good, and excellent you managed
> to get that much money, but they did pay alot!!
It's not a web page, it's a web site.
It looks basic but then what else can be put onto it?
Try clicking some of the links and looking around. There's a search option which would be complicated enough, the layout is presented well and look how when you resize your browser to mimic different resolutions, the whole page is still laid out perfectly. It's easy to make a site but different resolutions can really make things complicated.
There's a lot more work gone into that than you'd think, and considering you'd just owned up to using a Homestead mailer, I think you should hide away before he sees this!
Any idiot can get a copy of Dreamweaver and make a site look presentable but that's the easy bit. You try to make a site that has search aspects to start with. You'll be there a looooooooooong time.
Basic as it may seem, that site has a LOT of stuff to it...
> £60,000 for that??!?!?!
>
> I am looking at the right page arent I ?? because that is a very
> simple page!!
>
> Who ever paid you that must be very dumb or very despirite.
>
> Im not saying its crap, because its good, and excellent you managed
> to get that much money, but they did pay alot!!
It's not a web page, it's a web site.
It looks basic but then what else can be put onto it?
Try clicking some of the links and looking around. There's a search option which would be complicated enough, the layout is presented well and look how when you resize your browser to mimic different resolutions, the whole page is still laid out perfectly. It's easy to make a site but different resolutions can really make things complicated.
There's a lot more work gone into that than you'd think, and considering you'd just owned up to using a Homestead mailer, I think you should hide away before he sees this!
Any idiot can get a copy of Dreamweaver and make a site look presentable but that's the easy bit. You try to make a site that has search aspects to start with. You'll be there a looooooooooong time.
Basic as it may seem, that site has a LOT of stuff to it...
Chad Niga wrote:
> £60,000 for that??!?!?!
>
> I am looking at the right page arent I ?? because that is a very
> simple page!!
>
> Who ever paid you that must be very dumb or very despirite.
>
> Im not saying its crap, because its good, and excellent you managed
> to get that much money, but they did pay alot!!
It's not a web page, it's a web site.
It looks basic but then what else can be put onto it?
Try clicking some of the links and looking around. There's a search option which would be complicated enough, the layout is presented well and look how when you resize your browser to mimic different resolutions, the whole page is still laid out perfectly. It's easy to make a site but different resolutions can really make things complicated.
There's a lot more work gone into that than you'd think, and considering you'd just owned up to using a Homestead mailer, I think you should hide away before he sees this!
Any idiot can get a copy of Dreamweaver and make a site look presentable but that's the easy bit. You try to make a site that has search aspects to start with. You'll be there a looooooooooong time.
Basic as it may seem, that site has a LOT of stuff to it...
> £60,000 for that??!?!?!
>
> I am looking at the right page arent I ?? because that is a very
> simple page!!
>
> Who ever paid you that must be very dumb or very despirite.
>
> Im not saying its crap, because its good, and excellent you managed
> to get that much money, but they did pay alot!!
It's not a web page, it's a web site.
It looks basic but then what else can be put onto it?
Try clicking some of the links and looking around. There's a search option which would be complicated enough, the layout is presented well and look how when you resize your browser to mimic different resolutions, the whole page is still laid out perfectly. It's easy to make a site but different resolutions can really make things complicated.
There's a lot more work gone into that than you'd think, and considering you'd just owned up to using a Homestead mailer, I think you should hide away before he sees this!
Any idiot can get a copy of Dreamweaver and make a site look presentable but that's the easy bit. You try to make a site that has search aspects to start with. You'll be there a looooooooooong time.
Basic as it may seem, that site has a LOT of stuff to it...
EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> cookie monster wrote:
> El ® ö B ì Ñ . wrote:
> http://free.hostdepartment.com/r/robinh/
>
> Urgh.
>
> Whats wrong with it?
> If you are referring to the site name, it is only that while i am
> building it, once it is finished i will put it onto their site.
>
> www.lowbiza.co.uk
Dont you think its trying to be a bit too...Cool?
> cookie monster wrote:
> El ® ö B ì Ñ . wrote:
> http://free.hostdepartment.com/r/robinh/
>
> Urgh.
>
> Whats wrong with it?
> If you are referring to the site name, it is only that while i am
> building it, once it is finished i will put it onto their site.
>
> www.lowbiza.co.uk
Dont you think its trying to be a bit too...Cool?
Page: