The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/ adventure/tombraidertheangelod/news_6072539.html
--
They blame the box office meh-ness of Tomb Raider:Cradle of Life on the fact that gamers didn't like Angel of Darkness?
Seems to me that the reason it didn't do very well is because it's a lazy sequel to a boring, pointless film that didn't do fantastically well in the 1st place?
Angelina Jolie gets naked in loads of films, no need to spend your £ on this rubbish.
Oh, looks like nobody has anyway.
Good. Dont blame the game, blame dull, derivative, thoughtless McMovies that people have gorged on and are full.
--
They blame the box office meh-ness of Tomb Raider:Cradle of Life on the fact that gamers didn't like Angel of Darkness?
Seems to me that the reason it didn't do very well is because it's a lazy sequel to a boring, pointless film that didn't do fantastically well in the 1st place?
Angelina Jolie gets naked in loads of films, no need to spend your £ on this rubbish.
Oh, looks like nobody has anyway.
Good. Dont blame the game, blame dull, derivative, thoughtless McMovies that people have gorged on and are full.
Page:
cookie monster wrote:
> Och, i reported that first.
don;t be a child. IT WAS ME!!!!!!!! ME ME ME ME ME!!!!!
> Och, i reported that first.
don;t be a child. IT WAS ME!!!!!!!! ME ME ME ME ME!!!!!
monkey_man wrote:
> cookie monster wrote:
> Och, i reported that first.
>
> don;t be a child. IT WAS ME!!!!!!!! ME ME ME ME ME!!!!!
Heh.
> cookie monster wrote:
> Och, i reported that first.
>
> don;t be a child. IT WAS ME!!!!!!!! ME ME ME ME ME!!!!!
Heh.
El Blokey wrote:
> Goatboy wrote:
> And on another related note, they're remaking Dawn of The Dead and
> making it PG-13.
>
> On top of that, it apparently doesn't feature a mall.
Apparently it does...
Ving Rhames is going to be in in, or so I read.
Worst quote regarding the movie, however, is this:
"a contemporized fright film that aims to place a greater emphasis on action and a young cast than the original".
More info:
movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hp&cf=prev&id=1808473169&intl=us
> Goatboy wrote:
> And on another related note, they're remaking Dawn of The Dead and
> making it PG-13.
>
> On top of that, it apparently doesn't feature a mall.
Apparently it does...
Ving Rhames is going to be in in, or so I read.
Worst quote regarding the movie, however, is this:
"a contemporized fright film that aims to place a greater emphasis on action and a young cast than the original".
More info:
movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hp&cf=prev&id=1808473169&intl=us
That reads like I'm trying to imply that Ving Rhames is, in fact, a mall, but he isn't really. It's just poorly written.
Meka Dragon wrote:
> "a contemporized fright film that aims to place a greater
> emphasis on action and a young cast than the original".
So it's basically a dumbed-down version that won't offend any factions (especially those freaky religious American ones), and allows for a 12 rating so that there's an increased revenue from kids watching it.
Balls.
They might as well film a kitten playing with daisies. Oh hang on, that might be exploiting the kitten and hurting the flowers. Sheesh.
> "a contemporized fright film that aims to place a greater
> emphasis on action and a young cast than the original".
So it's basically a dumbed-down version that won't offend any factions (especially those freaky religious American ones), and allows for a 12 rating so that there's an increased revenue from kids watching it.
Balls.
They might as well film a kitten playing with daisies. Oh hang on, that might be exploiting the kitten and hurting the flowers. Sheesh.
Meka Dragon wrote:
> That reads like I'm trying to imply that Ving Rhames is, in fact, a
> mall, but he isn't really. It's just poorly written.
*giggles*
> That reads like I'm trying to imply that Ving Rhames is, in fact, a
> mall, but he isn't really. It's just poorly written.
*giggles*
Page: