Viewing Thread:
"Raw better than smackdown? the draft has killed smackdown! ne other topics?"

Raw is so much better than smackdown even the crap matches on raw r as good as the main events on smackdown! bring the undertaker angle lesner and cena to raw and smackdown dont have a show! every week big show lesnor and angle and taker and cena they fight each other! so boring!

AUstin is a legend! on rw he will get fired, but i reckon he mite get offred a contract to wrestle agen! and defeat kane and the game for the title! wotya reckon?

p.s maybe i am in dreamlnad bout austin back in the ring

Ya think?! RAW is, and will forever be (well, for a long time to come), Jericho. :)

Ant wrote:
> But RAW is Jericho, who I still feel is by far the most entertaining
> star in the WWE, in the ring and on the mic.

He is now, but when THE ROCK! returns, he won't be.

Up until perhaps Vengeance I have preferred RAW, and probably still do.

Actually, change that. I prefer the RAW main event, but I think Smackdown has a stronger undercard.

The fact that Smackdown can have Rey Mysterio vs Matt Hardy for the Cruiser Title as it's official main event and get huge reactions, and that RAW can't get a decent reaction for Scott Steiner and Test most of the time says something.

But RAW is Jericho, who I still feel is by far the most entertaining star in the WWE, in the ring and on the mic. Evolution are looking good now, we're set for Goldberg vs HHH, Booker T is IC Champion and I'm looking forward to Kane's new angle and a real match between him and RVD...it's too close to call at the mo between the two shows.

619 wrote:
> well said!!!

Thankyou...I pride myself on being objective...

well said!!!

Ok...there will NEVER be a definitive end to this argument because...
Everyone who likes actual WRESTLING will be for smackdown...WHY? Angle,Benoit, Guerrero, Mysterio, Lesnar,The Cruiserweights, Nunzio...etc...
BUT everyone who likes storylines will always prefer Raw because they have all the charismatic guys

Raw is by far better. They have a mor variiety of wrestlers to keep matches and rivalrys 'fresh'. Smackdown is lame. Fo example:
Week 1:Brock Lesnar vs. Big Show & The worlds greatest tag team.
Week 2:Kurt Angle vs. Big Show & The worlds greatest tag team.
Week 3:Brock Lesnar, Kurt Angle & Zach Gowen vs.Big Show & The worlds greatest tag team.

All they intoruduced was one new wrestler over 3 weeks of main events. See my point?

Raw has better wrestlers in general but Smackdown produce better matches and have the two best wrestlers in the WWE. Angle and Benoit rule.

Triple H isn't dominating Raw like he did because his programme with Goldberg hasn't started yet. It will probably start on Raw tomorrow.

I find it funny that this Kane thing started with Triple H beating Kane and then beating RVD, both in consecutive weeks...

Actually the past couple of weeks the main event hasn't been Triple H against some1, it's been the whole incident with Kane.

AfroJoe wrote:
> SmackDown is better than RAW.

I agree