The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I've made a RAW thread which is basically for discussing what happens on RAW. Every week just talk about what happened on RAW, I never actually see that much talk about each show so I've decided to make this thread. Whatever you do PLEASE don't put any spoilers in or if you really have to do it after Friday Night.
I think this seems like a good idea but if you guys don't like it just let it die, however, if this works out I'll make a smackdown thread soon enough.
I think this seems like a good idea but if you guys don't like it just let it die, however, if this works out I'll make a smackdown thread soon enough.
Page:
Heh...Christy and Eugene? LOL.
Very_Metal wrote:
> Eugene is a lucky, LUCKY man.
>
> that is all.
He almost got Carmella aswell but Christy is the better of the two, no doubt about it.
> Eugene is a lucky, LUCKY man.
>
> that is all.
He almost got Carmella aswell but Christy is the better of the two, no doubt about it.
Eugene is a lucky, LUCKY man.
that is all.
that is all.
Kane got beat up real bad! Interesting...but wasn't he a super strong, crazy monster who everyone was afraid of? Hhmm....Go WWE!
Raw is the best show in the world better then Dragon ball Gt better then Smack down, hahahahaha no compitition. raw is the alimate heheh.
(_B-(I) wrote:
> Yeah, WWE will have to go easy or he could suffer from said
> over-exposure. Where Orton will be in-ring wise really depends on
> Orton, it could go one of two ways he could go the way the Rock went,
> relying on the same old moves to get cheap pops, without every really
> understanding psychology or the need to add to his repetoire. Or he
> could learn from the people he steps into the ring with every week to
> gradually imporve his performance. He still has a lot of potential,
> but how many guys do we see not live up to their potential?
a sad fact, but true :(
hopefully he won't go the way of the Rock. as much as the rock entertains me, you can call his matches with your eyes closed as the moves are all the same and usually the order in which they happen is 90% constant as well :-\
>
> Who were you thinking of that he had to carry?
>
> Well, Batista on Raw was a good start and he proved to me in that
> match, that he was't ready to do this.
damn you :)
i didn't actually get to see the end of RAW until the highlight shows this weekend and i have to say i'm with you on that one. it was a good enough match, but felt like it was lacking "something". that something was experience.
> Yeah, WWE will have to go easy or he could suffer from said
> over-exposure. Where Orton will be in-ring wise really depends on
> Orton, it could go one of two ways he could go the way the Rock went,
> relying on the same old moves to get cheap pops, without every really
> understanding psychology or the need to add to his repetoire. Or he
> could learn from the people he steps into the ring with every week to
> gradually imporve his performance. He still has a lot of potential,
> but how many guys do we see not live up to their potential?
a sad fact, but true :(
hopefully he won't go the way of the Rock. as much as the rock entertains me, you can call his matches with your eyes closed as the moves are all the same and usually the order in which they happen is 90% constant as well :-\
>
> Who were you thinking of that he had to carry?
>
> Well, Batista on Raw was a good start and he proved to me in that
> match, that he was't ready to do this.
damn you :)
i didn't actually get to see the end of RAW until the highlight shows this weekend and i have to say i'm with you on that one. it was a good enough match, but felt like it was lacking "something". that something was experience.
Very_Metal wrote:
> hmmm, you raise some good points. maybe i posted a little too
> "spur of the moment"-ly, but i stand by what i said, i was
> VERY impressed with his performance on RAW this week. Although you've
> posted about Orton as he stands now, what do you see in the future
> for him? sadly i feel he'll get over exposed and dry up in under 3
> years :(
>
Yeah, WWE will have to go easy or he could suffer from said over-exposure. Where Orton will be in-ring wise really depends on Orton, it could go one of two ways he could go the way the Rock went, relying on the same old moves to get cheap pops, without every really understanding psychology or the need to add to his repetoire. Or he could learn from the people he steps into the ring with every week to gradually imporve his performance. He still has a lot of potential, but how many guys do we see not live up to their potential?
> i see what you mean about the RKO (it's clearly not as good as my
> finisher ;) ), although you notice he's added the "kneel and
> wait" stance to the start of it to add a bit of edge and signal
> when he's going for it. With regard to his carrying of an opponent,
> he's not really HAD to so far, at least, not to my mind. Who were you
> thinking of that he had to carry?
Well, Batista on Raw was a good start and he proved to me in that match, that he was't ready to do this. Until he is, it's my opinion that he shouldn't even be considered in the world title bracket, leave that to the Benoits and HHHs of this world.
> hmmm, you raise some good points. maybe i posted a little too
> "spur of the moment"-ly, but i stand by what i said, i was
> VERY impressed with his performance on RAW this week. Although you've
> posted about Orton as he stands now, what do you see in the future
> for him? sadly i feel he'll get over exposed and dry up in under 3
> years :(
>
Yeah, WWE will have to go easy or he could suffer from said over-exposure. Where Orton will be in-ring wise really depends on Orton, it could go one of two ways he could go the way the Rock went, relying on the same old moves to get cheap pops, without every really understanding psychology or the need to add to his repetoire. Or he could learn from the people he steps into the ring with every week to gradually imporve his performance. He still has a lot of potential, but how many guys do we see not live up to their potential?
> i see what you mean about the RKO (it's clearly not as good as my
> finisher ;) ), although you notice he's added the "kneel and
> wait" stance to the start of it to add a bit of edge and signal
> when he's going for it. With regard to his carrying of an opponent,
> he's not really HAD to so far, at least, not to my mind. Who were you
> thinking of that he had to carry?
Well, Batista on Raw was a good start and he proved to me in that match, that he was't ready to do this. Until he is, it's my opinion that he shouldn't even be considered in the world title bracket, leave that to the Benoits and HHHs of this world.
I though Edge was supposed to be out injured again anyways...
Jericho's definitely more deserving than Edge.
Bah. I wanted to vote Jericho to face Triple H for the title at Taboo Tuesday... :(
Page: