The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I've made a RAW thread which is basically for discussing what happens on RAW. Every week just talk about what happened on RAW, I never actually see that much talk about each show so I've decided to make this thread. Whatever you do PLEASE don't put any spoilers in or if you really have to do it after Friday Night.
I think this seems like a good idea but if you guys don't like it just let it die, however, if this works out I'll make a smackdown thread soon enough.
I think this seems like a good idea but if you guys don't like it just let it die, however, if this works out I'll make a smackdown thread soon enough.
Page:
Talking more about their wrestling talents, then their ahem 'talents' :-D
lalakersrule wrote:
> 4 WWE women wrestlers in the ring at once? Geez i've seen car wrecks
> that look prettier then the botch fest that will most likely ensue.
Only 1 diva that I think is "fit" in that fatal four way...so I guess that makes sense :P
> 4 WWE women wrestlers in the ring at once? Geez i've seen car wrecks
> that look prettier then the botch fest that will most likely ensue.
Only 1 diva that I think is "fit" in that fatal four way...so I guess that makes sense :P
4 WWE women wrestlers in the ring at once? Geez i've seen car wrecks that look prettier then the botch fest that will most likely ensue.
lalakersrule wrote:
> Anyway onto things actually relating to Raw.
>
> So Lita beats Gail Kim, that's sensible seeing as Gail Kim is only
> the friggin number one contender to the women's championship, which
> she's fighting for this Sunday. What better way to make her look good
> then to lose?
They want to do a fatal four way don't they? That's why Lita beat Gail...
> Anyway onto things actually relating to Raw.
>
> So Lita beats Gail Kim, that's sensible seeing as Gail Kim is only
> the friggin number one contender to the women's championship, which
> she's fighting for this Sunday. What better way to make her look good
> then to lose?
They want to do a fatal four way don't they? That's why Lita beat Gail...
Lipe wrote:
> Lalakers...*sighs* I'm not even gonna bother.
Thanks, wasted enough of my time having to type that out, back onto having a go at the creative team :-D
> Lalakers...*sighs* I'm not even gonna bother.
Thanks, wasted enough of my time having to type that out, back onto having a go at the creative team :-D
Anyway onto things actually relating to Raw.
So Lita beats Gail Kim, that's sensible seeing as Gail Kim is only the friggin number one contender to the women's championship, which she's fighting for this Sunday. What better way to make her look good then to lose?
Obviously in the bizarro world of the WWE creative team department that may actually work, i just think it's stupid booking decisions once again but meh :-D
So Lita beats Gail Kim, that's sensible seeing as Gail Kim is only the friggin number one contender to the women's championship, which she's fighting for this Sunday. What better way to make her look good then to lose?
Obviously in the bizarro world of the WWE creative team department that may actually work, i just think it's stupid booking decisions once again but meh :-D
Lalakers...*sighs* I'm not even gonna bother.
Lipe wrote:
> lalakersrule wrote:
> And anyway i don't keep repeating the same thing about him, i come
> up
> with lots of ways to insult him :-D
>
> For instance find me anywhere else i have said *i hope Michaels
> bloody cripples him at Bad Blood* and i'll give you a cookie.
>
> You edited this a day later...took you a day to go through all of
> your recent posts eh? :P
Nope, i just don't spend all my time online, i go out of that rectangular shaped thing in the wall called a door and into this strange place called the real world where i have this puzzling thing called a life, which i lead. So when i was reading through the messages i decided to put that little example at the end of the message when i finally got back online. Surprisingly i find leading a life and spending time with my girlfriend more important then proving you wrong, although that is very fun as well :-D
> lalakersrule wrote:
> And anyway i don't keep repeating the same thing about him, i come
> up
> with lots of ways to insult him :-D
>
> For instance find me anywhere else i have said *i hope Michaels
> bloody cripples him at Bad Blood* and i'll give you a cookie.
>
> You edited this a day later...took you a day to go through all of
> your recent posts eh? :P
Nope, i just don't spend all my time online, i go out of that rectangular shaped thing in the wall called a door and into this strange place called the real world where i have this puzzling thing called a life, which i lead. So when i was reading through the messages i decided to put that little example at the end of the message when i finally got back online. Surprisingly i find leading a life and spending time with my girlfriend more important then proving you wrong, although that is very fun as well :-D
Lol
lalakersrule wrote:
> And anyway i don't keep repeating the same thing about him, i come up
> with lots of ways to insult him :-D
>
> For instance find me anywhere else i have said *i hope Michaels
> bloody cripples him at Bad Blood* and i'll give you a cookie.
You edited this a day later...took you a day to go through all of your recent posts eh? :P
> And anyway i don't keep repeating the same thing about him, i come up
> with lots of ways to insult him :-D
>
> For instance find me anywhere else i have said *i hope Michaels
> bloody cripples him at Bad Blood* and i'll give you a cookie.
You edited this a day later...took you a day to go through all of your recent posts eh? :P
Page: