The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Hello Bell,
Seeing as I don't want to turn a someone else's thread into a slanging match, I thought I'd start my own and repeat what I've said;
Please, give me your story on how Bush won the election fair and square, and I'll detail why I believe he is no more the legitimately elected president than you are a courageous debator who will always meet a challenge. Then we can let it drop. Feel free to start...
Seeing as I don't want to turn a someone else's thread into a slanging match, I thought I'd start my own and repeat what I've said;
Please, give me your story on how Bush won the election fair and square, and I'll detail why I believe he is no more the legitimately elected president than you are a courageous debator who will always meet a challenge. Then we can let it drop. Feel free to start...
Page:
Okay, you have it yes ? Tell me a page, any page, and ask what is on it or what a certain word is ? I have the Vintage 1992first print in paperback. Cover is silver, with the US flag on, imposed over a globe, with the US continent to the left side, and an eagle on top of the globe.
Believe what you want, but I know.
Believe what you want, but I know.
As if any kind of studied cynicism can distract from the fact you ran like a girl from being called on your Chomsky "I have it on my shelf" lies.
Punk liar.
Punk liar.
*yawns* You listen to him huh ?
*listens to Noam Chomsky*
Liar coward.
Liar coward.
*pop*
*listens to the silence*
*listens to the silence*
Light wrote:
> Tell you what f**knuts, why don't you try having a cancer scare and
> then watching your girlfriend emigrate in the same week? See how you
> hold it together.
Well F**knuts, if you were less abusive in general and stopped posting altogether then I'd be bothered. As it is you find time and strength to throw retorts/abuse around elsewhere and demand answers, so find someone who will give you sympathy...
If you were nicer in general then I'd understand, but taking it out on others it ultimately self destructive and does nothing to resolve the situation.
> Tell you what f**knuts, why don't you try having a cancer scare and
> then watching your girlfriend emigrate in the same week? See how you
> hold it together.
Well F**knuts, if you were less abusive in general and stopped posting altogether then I'd be bothered. As it is you find time and strength to throw retorts/abuse around elsewhere and demand answers, so find someone who will give you sympathy...
If you were nicer in general then I'd understand, but taking it out on others it ultimately self destructive and does nothing to resolve the situation.
Practical Magic wrote:
> Come on Goatboy, you wanted serious points, scroll down and click back
> 14 points of clear information to refute. Light's ducked it, now you ?
> or doesn't Mr Moore cover those in his book :P
Tell you what f**knuts, why don't you try having a cancer scare and then watching your girlfriend emigrate in the same week? See how you hold it together.
And, for the record, I've posted to apologise and promise I will post when I've got my head sorted. In other words, I didn't run wailing. Like you do.
> Come on Goatboy, you wanted serious points, scroll down and click back
> 14 points of clear information to refute. Light's ducked it, now you ?
> or doesn't Mr Moore cover those in his book :P
Tell you what f**knuts, why don't you try having a cancer scare and then watching your girlfriend emigrate in the same week? See how you hold it together.
And, for the record, I've posted to apologise and promise I will post when I've got my head sorted. In other words, I didn't run wailing. Like you do.
Goatboy wrote:
> As soon as you have the honour and decency to reply to the topic I've
> been waiting for a response for (no doubt you'll ask me to pop it),
> then I shall in kind return the favour of answering you.
>
---
And if it please the "court of hard evidence", I would like to offer this as document (c) in the "I'll do what you ask when you return the favour that I have been asking for 2 weeks now".
> As soon as you have the honour and decency to reply to the topic I've
> been waiting for a response for (no doubt you'll ask me to pop it),
> then I shall in kind return the favour of answering you.
>
---
And if it please the "court of hard evidence", I would like to offer this as document (c) in the "I'll do what you ask when you return the favour that I have been asking for 2 weeks now".
Goatboy wrote:
> Listen Banacyk, the day you do the same is the day I shall return the
> favour.
> Your hard evidence like the "Iraq buying uranium for nuclear
> programme", which has been dismissed by The White House and the
> group that investigated.
> "hard evidence that would stand in a court of law"
--
I also refer Your Honour to the above statement.
> Listen Banacyk, the day you do the same is the day I shall return the
> favour.
> Your hard evidence like the "Iraq buying uranium for nuclear
> programme", which has been dismissed by The White House and the
> group that investigated.
> "hard evidence that would stand in a court of law"
--
I also refer Your Honour to the above statement.
Practical Magic wrote:
> Come on Goatboy, you wanted serious points, scroll down and click back
> 14 points of clear information to refute. Light's ducked it, now you ?
> or doesn't Mr Moore cover those in his book :P
---
I would like to draw Your Honour's attention to the "I know you are but what am I" defence of 2003, repeatedly used by Mr Dandy.
> Come on Goatboy, you wanted serious points, scroll down and click back
> 14 points of clear information to refute. Light's ducked it, now you ?
> or doesn't Mr Moore cover those in his book :P
---
I would like to draw Your Honour's attention to the "I know you are but what am I" defence of 2003, repeatedly used by Mr Dandy.
Page: