Viewing Thread:
"Electoral Fraud"

Hello Bell,

Seeing as I don't want to turn a someone else's thread into a slanging match, I thought I'd start my own and repeat what I've said;

Please, give me your story on how Bush won the election fair and square, and I'll detail why I believe he is no more the legitimately elected president than you are a courageous debator who will always meet a challenge. Then we can let it drop. Feel free to start...

LL Cool ver T.2d wrote:
> Ok, so on page 164, 3rd paragraph down.
> First 3 sentences please."

"Queried on a report that banking practices would be modified to deter drug-money-laundering, President Endara said that any changes would be "not that profound" and that "the bankers want changes that are reasonable and will not duly change the banking environment"."

You'll have to make do with 1 sentence, the next ones got a large quote from "US Authorities" whoever they are, and I'm not typing all that out.

Here we go, about a page back , 14 odd points I posted as Practical Magic, no one ever did reply about them.

Yep.
Yesterday. Not today when you bought the book, but yesterday when you had it sitting on your shelf.
But you didnt. And chose to ignore that thread totally.

Because you're a moron. A lying moron at that.

I found this, posted by Goatboy at 4.28pm yesterday, in the 'Dossier' thread:

"Practical Magic wrote:
> Whatever, I've got it sitting on the shelf here. I'e lifked through it
> but nothing else more, read the odd bit. That's all, as for Moore, no
> way I'd by his toss.
---

Ok, so on page 164, 3rd paragraph down.
First 3 sentences please."

Where did you ask for a sentence ?

He doesn't necessarily own one even now. A quick look on Amazon showed me the cover of which Belldandy described, and you only have to click on it to get a bigger view.

Ssshh, I'm enjoying watching him dig himself further and further into a hole on this one.
Bell didn't have the book. Kept stressing how he'd "never read or buy rubbish from a leftist liberal like Chomsky".
Yet, oddly, when challenged?

He's got a copy and "from what I've read" and "Deterring Democracy seems to suggest", whereupon he competely misinterprets the approach Chomsky takes in that particular book, seems to not be able to locate the chapters on Russia and doesn't seem to know how to turn pages.
Which then went to "It's on my shelf, I've leafed through it"
And when asked to provide a sentence? Nothing.

Yet today? He takes the time to give explicit description of the book, including the year and edition.
Like I said yesterday Mr Dandy, running out and buying a copy doesn't make you right.
In fact, if you have that book in your possession, read it.
Then read your "thoughts" about Chomsky.

Then pull up your pants and go home in a sulk with your ball under your arm.
You've been rumbled, and on Chomsky I'll nail you.

Belldandy: "Chomsky thinks the Cold War never ended"

Synopsis of the book from Amazon.co.uk: "An analysis of America's political actions (as opposed to its rhetoric) before, during and AFTER the Cold War"

And if you go back and read the Dossier thread, you'll see the part where I say
"and running out to Borders and buying a copy tonight won't help"

I asked you for page numbers yesterday.
You couldn't do it so you ignored the thread.
And page numbers aside, your comments about what Deterring Democracy was about are so staggeringly...well...wrong, that you'd do best to read your nice new copy and realise just how hard I'm laughing at you.

Silly little Bell, trying to backpedal.
*pats head*

I asked you that yesterday kid, and you ran.
Still ran and refused to post.
Nice try.