Viewing Thread:
"An overview of this Dossier"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3049868.stm

--

Report due today.
Mentions the facts in nice, concise and clear points.
Of course, you could argue that the BBC is biased thanks to Alistair Campbell's comments.
Or you could argue that Campbell's tactics are to divert attention and interest away from the fundemental issues and get everyone concentrating on 45 mins and "sexed up".

I'll only say that Campbell is not an elected official, merely an independantly appointed advisor for Blair. A Spin Doctor who's job it is to minimise damage and put government in a favourable light.
He certainly deserves a raise, whatever the result.

You still havent addressed the perfectly reasonable points I have asked of you.

Hedfix wrote:
> Is see a new pattern of posting emerging in this topic.
>
> 1.An 'Answer the question type' post posted by Goatboy.
> 2.No response by Bell
> 3.Another 'Answer the question type post' posted by Goatboy.
> 4.No response by Bell
> etc
>
> Mabye you have to refer to him as 'Practical Magic' instead? It's
> worth a go. :D

We have a revised pattern.

1)Goatboy
2)Me
3)Goatboy
4)Me
5)Blank whining
6)Goatboy
7) Me

etc

Blank wrote:
> Which is why every topic ends up with Goatboy, Light, me, and anyone
> else who was remotely interested in the thread shouting "ANSWER
> THE QUESTION BELLDANDY!".

Technically there is no Belldandy you know ?

>
> And what is your usual response? All together now: "I can't be
> bothered, it's only a chat forum. I've been to university, so I'm
> better. And you're an apprentice".

Hmm, fair enough on the I can't be bothered and it's only a chat forum, and you're an apprentice (which you are Blank :P ) but "I've been to university, so I'm better." ? Nope, don't know where you got that from apart from your own little apprentice mind. I have no doubt that Goatboy and Light have both also been to university - certainly Light has if he was/is a solicitor type person. In fact I think a fair few people on here have been or are at university.

> But this post is pointless, isn't it?

Excellent *Mr Brittas style* Can I have this Saturday's lottery numbers please ?

Is see a new pattern of posting emerging in this topic.

1.An 'Answer the question type' post posted by Goatboy.
2.No response by Bell
3.Another 'Answer the question type post' posted by Goatboy.
4.No response by Bell
etc

Mabye you have to refer to him as 'Practical Magic' instead? It's worth a go. :D

*pop*

I think the refusal to acknowledge perfectly reasonable, non-inflammatory questions and total ignoring of this topic highlights exactly the problem with debating with you Bell.
If you think you're right, you'll pick a post apart for days and days.

Somebody points something out that might require you to acknowledge errors or criminal stupidity? "La la la, can't hear you"

*shrugs*
It's not like we didn't know you lacked the ability to behave like a reasonable person.

*pop*
Because Bell is here, reading and ignoring.
*waves* Hello

*pop*
To help Bell read this. And not answer.

Practical Magic wrote:
> pattern of posting on this topic.
>
> 1.decent point posted by me or Goatboy.
> 2.response by the other
> 3.pointless post by Light/Blank
> 4.pointless post by Light/Blank
> etc

Yep, that sure is the pattern here. Of course.

Which is why every topic ends up with Goatboy, Light, me, and anyone else who was remotely interested in the thread shouting "ANSWER THE QUESTION BELLDANDY!".

And what is your usual response? All together now: "I can't be bothered, it's only a chat forum. I've been to university, so I'm better. And you're an apprentice".

If everything went according to the structure above, you and Goatboy would have polite conversations whilst ignoring me and Light. But it doesn't work that way. And you know I'm right - you only have to look in the threads to see that.

But this post is pointless, isn't it?

Practical Magic wrote:
> I've replied in the other one, but this one is not worth continuing
> for obvious reasons.
--

This is why you are a poor debater and a man of limited intelligence. Because you run from a situation where you have been called and can't google for an answer.

"this one is not worth continuing"
The last resort of a coward.
Oh, sorry, I forgot...you're the only person ever to have been to Uni and know more about everything than anyone else.
Except how to behave like a man instead of a red-headed stepchild.

And I know goading you will make you hate me so much your face goes red and you spack away at the keyboard with your justice-flippers until you paint yourself into another corner where you realise how stupid you look and leave in a huff.
For 8 days before returning with another name-change, where you will once again be made to look foolish for your lack of conviction in your beliefs.

How do I know this?
"I was wait for it..wrong"
"Gardening in Iraq"
"Bellusconi"
All threads where you slinked away when proven to be an asshat.

*pop*

Because Mr Dandy is intent lacking the decency to respond to polite, well mannered concerns about his attitudes.

Here Bell, almost a week after initially asking you to have the courage to reply to the points.
Although your pointed refusal to accept any form of criticism, however well behaved, is highlighted to perfect example here.
So instead of trying to goad me with infantile "what do you actually know" blather, be a man and answer these accusations.

Instead of "it's not worth it"
Because it is worth it. But you won't.
Because you dont have the balls/intelligence/honour to admit when you're wrong.