The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3049868.stm
--
Report due today.
Mentions the facts in nice, concise and clear points.
Of course, you could argue that the BBC is biased thanks to Alistair Campbell's comments.
Or you could argue that Campbell's tactics are to divert attention and interest away from the fundemental issues and get everyone concentrating on 45 mins and "sexed up".
I'll only say that Campbell is not an elected official, merely an independantly appointed advisor for Blair. A Spin Doctor who's job it is to minimise damage and put government in a favourable light.
He certainly deserves a raise, whatever the result.
--
Report due today.
Mentions the facts in nice, concise and clear points.
Of course, you could argue that the BBC is biased thanks to Alistair Campbell's comments.
Or you could argue that Campbell's tactics are to divert attention and interest away from the fundemental issues and get everyone concentrating on 45 mins and "sexed up".
I'll only say that Campbell is not an elected official, merely an independantly appointed advisor for Blair. A Spin Doctor who's job it is to minimise damage and put government in a favourable light.
He certainly deserves a raise, whatever the result.
Page:
Twiddly wrote:
your continued insistence only makes you look quite stupid to
> me
---
*phew*
And there was me actually concerned what you thought about me. Nice to know you think I'm stupid. Yet manage to reply pretty much each and every time I post in criticism of Bell.
your continued insistence only makes you look quite stupid to
> me
---
*phew*
And there was me actually concerned what you thought about me. Nice to know you think I'm stupid. Yet manage to reply pretty much each and every time I post in criticism of Bell.
I'm sure you're convinced you're either making some magnificent intuitive leap by linking me with some other politically one sided yes-man, or just irritating some random newbie, but at the end of the day, your continued insistence only makes you look quite stupid to me.
But carry on, you're dead clever.
But carry on, you're dead clever.
Did you see that the Daily Mail had published Jeffrey Archer's prison diary today. What a bunch of hypocritical clowns. One minute slagging him off, the next using him to get readers. I made myself read it too, and Archer seems to think he's some sort of Christopher-Lambert-in-Fortress figure. Not a pasty, small, thin, old man that should have been bully-bum raped by big men.
Cheers Bell.
I do believe I have at last found the one person on this earth who needs to smoke far more regularly.
*pop*
Because the stupid virgin won't answer.
Because he has no answers he can google or read in The Daily Mail.
Because he is a clueless Joe with the inability to think for himself.
Baaaaaah Baaaaah Baaaaaah
Because the stupid virgin won't answer.
Because he has no answers he can google or read in The Daily Mail.
Because he is a clueless Joe with the inability to think for himself.
Baaaaaah Baaaaah Baaaaaah
Goatboy wrote: >
> You were wrong about the gardening in iraq thread. You said
> "this
> proves that Iraq is pursuing a nuclear programme", when in fact
> that link states that they had not the means nor the scientists to
> pursue a programme since the early nineties. "at some
> point"
> is a ridiculous comment, that could mean 1845.
>
> As for the Kapo thing.
> Your error, as well you know because I explained it in my response
> that you chose to not reply to (but have chosen to reply to each and
> every post in this thread), that it wasn't the translation I
> objected
> to - and I'll state it here - but your comments about what a Kapo
> was,
> their relation to Nazis and the treatment/feelings by prisoners.
> You said "calling someone a Kapo does not mean they're a
> Nazi".
> And as I explained, you were and are wrong.
> Not the translation but your comments about what a Kapo was and did.
>
> Yet you have chosen to not respond to that thread, if you look back
> (or I'll pop it), my comments were the last one.
> Same as your "Gardening in Iraq" thread, you chose not to
> respond to the links, information or questions I posed to you.
>
> And as my last post to you in this thread Bell, I explained why I
> get
> annoyed at you - because with areas that you feel you are correct
> then, as with here, you will reply to each and every single reply.
> But in threads were you are on shaky ground, you choose to ignore
> that
> thread and let it sink - hence me popping politely.
> I could take you a lot more seriously if you stuck to your dogmatic
> approach to arguing and responded to threads that post serious
> questions instead of choosing to ignore and move on.
> ---
--
Just so Bell reads this, as you will, and realise just how seriously you should take Mr Plush Toy Collector.
Posting in plenty other threads, yet ignoring this one.
Punk
> You were wrong about the gardening in iraq thread. You said
> "this
> proves that Iraq is pursuing a nuclear programme", when in fact
> that link states that they had not the means nor the scientists to
> pursue a programme since the early nineties. "at some
> point"
> is a ridiculous comment, that could mean 1845.
>
> As for the Kapo thing.
> Your error, as well you know because I explained it in my response
> that you chose to not reply to (but have chosen to reply to each and
> every post in this thread), that it wasn't the translation I
> objected
> to - and I'll state it here - but your comments about what a Kapo
> was,
> their relation to Nazis and the treatment/feelings by prisoners.
> You said "calling someone a Kapo does not mean they're a
> Nazi".
> And as I explained, you were and are wrong.
> Not the translation but your comments about what a Kapo was and did.
>
> Yet you have chosen to not respond to that thread, if you look back
> (or I'll pop it), my comments were the last one.
> Same as your "Gardening in Iraq" thread, you chose not to
> respond to the links, information or questions I posed to you.
>
> And as my last post to you in this thread Bell, I explained why I
> get
> annoyed at you - because with areas that you feel you are correct
> then, as with here, you will reply to each and every single reply.
> But in threads were you are on shaky ground, you choose to ignore
> that
> thread and let it sink - hence me popping politely.
> I could take you a lot more seriously if you stuck to your dogmatic
> approach to arguing and responded to threads that post serious
> questions instead of choosing to ignore and move on.
> ---
--
Just so Bell reads this, as you will, and realise just how seriously you should take Mr Plush Toy Collector.
Posting in plenty other threads, yet ignoring this one.
Punk
In between buying Pikmin plush toys and wrapping himself in the Stars and Stripes before sobbing himself to sleep, jerking violently over a laminated pic of Tony Blair keening "It's alright, I know your pain Tony...they mock me too for being a waterhead know-nothing that refuses to admit when he's wrong...we'll show them huh? Huh Tony, huh?"
Practical Magic wrote:
> Nope, don't
> know where you got that from apart from your own little apprentice
> mind. I have no doubt that Goatboy and Light have both also been to
> university - certainly Light has if he was/is a solicitor type person.
> In fact I think a fair few people on here have been or are at
> university.
You've missed the point (first time for everything).
It's not about what I think about you going to university, but how you use that fact. No doubt Light has been to university, and the very fact that you mentioned that SHOWS that you missed the point. Because Light doesn't constantly say "Well I don't care, I've written theses (faeces?) and dissertations on a wide variety of topics".
You do.
> Nope, don't
> know where you got that from apart from your own little apprentice
> mind. I have no doubt that Goatboy and Light have both also been to
> university - certainly Light has if he was/is a solicitor type person.
> In fact I think a fair few people on here have been or are at
> university.
You've missed the point (first time for everything).
It's not about what I think about you going to university, but how you use that fact. No doubt Light has been to university, and the very fact that you mentioned that SHOWS that you missed the point. Because Light doesn't constantly say "Well I don't care, I've written theses (faeces?) and dissertations on a wide variety of topics".
You do.
This is a little more accurate...
>
> 1)Goatboy asks question
> 2)Bell avoids answering
> 3)Goatboy asks for answer
> 4)Bell refuses, and tries to sneer his way clear
> 5)Bell posts about everyone else whining
> 6)Goatboy repeats the question
> 7) Bell stops posting in that thread and pretends it never happened
God...you really are an abject failure as a human being, aren't you? Well, if you can bear to wait until Sunday, I'm looking forward to giving my view on the election, rebutting yours, and watching you torture the english language in order to avoid addressing a single point, you IQ free button monkey.
For the record; yes, aside from the 7 point thingy (which, as anyone who reads threads with your post in em will know, is factual), this is just abuse. I find that I need to lance my spite boil today.
>
> 1)Goatboy asks question
> 2)Bell avoids answering
> 3)Goatboy asks for answer
> 4)Bell refuses, and tries to sneer his way clear
> 5)Bell posts about everyone else whining
> 6)Goatboy repeats the question
> 7) Bell stops posting in that thread and pretends it never happened
God...you really are an abject failure as a human being, aren't you? Well, if you can bear to wait until Sunday, I'm looking forward to giving my view on the election, rebutting yours, and watching you torture the english language in order to avoid addressing a single point, you IQ free button monkey.
For the record; yes, aside from the 7 point thingy (which, as anyone who reads threads with your post in em will know, is factual), this is just abuse. I find that I need to lance my spite boil today.
Page: