Viewing Thread:
"An overview of this Dossier"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3049868.stm

--

Report due today.
Mentions the facts in nice, concise and clear points.
Of course, you could argue that the BBC is biased thanks to Alistair Campbell's comments.
Or you could argue that Campbell's tactics are to divert attention and interest away from the fundemental issues and get everyone concentrating on 45 mins and "sexed up".

I'll only say that Campbell is not an elected official, merely an independantly appointed advisor for Blair. A Spin Doctor who's job it is to minimise damage and put government in a favourable light.
He certainly deserves a raise, whatever the result.

Goatboy wrote:
> No, not obvious reasons.
> My post about 5 or 6 down.

You mean...you mean Bell is avoiding answering questions on a topic, and relying on merely restating his case whilst lacking the courage to actually give his reasons behind thinking that?!

Surely not?!?!

No, not obvious reasons.
My post about 5 or 6 down.

I've replied in the other one, but this one is not worth continuing for obvious reasons.

*pop*

Stryke wrote:
> Fair enough. He can be mine, I tire of doing the washing up.


Bwah ha ha haaa!

For some reason, that really made me chuckle...

Belldandy loves it. He just won't tell you why.

Fair enough. He can be mine, I tire of doing the washing up.

Nah, Belldandy said apprentice. You said groupie. Belldandy said groupie as well. So as you've come to the same conclusion, that obviously means one of you is a groupie of the other, no?

I never said apprentice, I said Goat-groupie. They're an old SR tradition.

But, to be honest, it's an internet forum. No-one cares all that much? Let's all hug and sing Kum Bye Are.

Blank has discussed loads of things without any input from me.
Same as I have taken you to task over things without any Blank help.

And to be honest, standing there shouting "Apprentice" is the last resort of someone unable to argue a view, and is reduced to insults.
But hey...