Viewing Thread:
"N64 vrs Playstation"

Which is the best N64 or Playstation?

It has got to be the N64!!!

I leave YOU to choose.
N64 or Graystation?

A few points:

1. I see no '2' after the title for this thread, so Ant, stop saying the PS2 has this and that; (128 bit etc)

2. The N64 has at least 300 games, which is more than enougfh.

3. If you put a top 10 list of games from say, N64 mag, and put them up against the top 10 games of Playstation mag, you would see a clear difference in graphics, size (all the games, not just FF7,8,9) and gameplay, with the N64 coming out as a clear winner.

4. Yes N64 mag is a good read. Better than those narrow minded NOM people.

Cyclone wrote:
> A few points:

1. I see no '2' after the title for this thread, so
> Ant, stop saying the PS2 has this and that; (128 bit etc)

2. The
> N64 has at least 300 games, which is more than enougfh.

3. If you
> put a top 10 list of games from say, N64 mag, and put them up
> against the top 10 games of Playstation mag, you would see a clear
> difference in graphics, size (all the games, not just FF7,8,9) and
> gameplay, with the N64 coming out as a clear winner.

4. Yes N64
> mag is a good read. Better than those narrow minded NOM people.

Hey, I ony mentioned it a couple of times, and I was only using it as reference.

At least 300 games??? Well, I've only ever seen about 100.

Also, maybe in graphics, but in gameplay?? No racer compares to GT2, no shoot 'em up in my opinion lives up to the sheer brilliance of MGS and Zelda is the only one that can match up to Final Fantasy.

Also, Crash would give games such as Banjo and even Mario64 a run for their money.

Actually, I think it would be very close.

well i have never read NOM its crap i read N64 Magisin
its much better and i was part reffering to your upbringing of that and the goughsters!

timothykelly1989 wrote:
> well i have never read NOM its crap i read N64 Magisin
its much
> better and i was part reffering to your upbringing of that and the
> goughsters!

Who's?? Mine??

Ant:

In N64 mag, their index has over 300 games in it.

WDC, Rush 2049, both have a lot of good points, and easily look better than GT2, while have a huge game underneath.

Perfect Dark beats MGS hands down - Graphics, size, weaponry, charecters, multiplayer, length, etc. I liked MGS, it was a great game, but Perfect Dark is better, although a little different.

Crash? Crahs is just 30/35 levels (a lot yes) of running away from, or towards the screen. Mario- 15, fully 3d levels, and he alone has more moves thatn Crash has. DK64 - 8 massive levels - 4,000 bannanas to collect, 201 golden bannanas etc. Crash is no comparison.

Ant wrote:
> Cyclone wrote:
> A few points:

1. I see no '2' after the
> title for this thread, so
> Ant, stop saying the PS2 has this
> and that; (128 bit etc)

2. The
> N64 has at least 300 games,
> which is more than enougfh.

3. If you
> put a top 10 list of
> games from say, N64 mag, and put them up
> against the top 10
> games of Playstation mag, you would see a clear
> difference in
> graphics, size (all the games, not just FF7,8,9) and
> gameplay,
> with the N64 coming out as a clear winner.

4. Yes N64
> mag
> is a good read. Better than those narrow minded NOM people.

Hey,
> I ony mentioned it a couple of times, and I was only using it as
> reference.

At least 300 games??? Well, I've only ever seen about
> 100.

Also, maybe in graphics, but in gameplay?? No racer compares
> to GT2, no shoot 'em up in my opinion lives up to the sheer
> brilliance of MGS and Zelda is the only one that can match up to
> Final Fantasy.

Also, Crash would give games such as Banjo and
> even Mario64 a run for their money.

Actually, I think it would be
> very close.


I haven't played the latest Crash games, so I would like to know if they are true 3D, like Mario. Or are they still the same as Crash2? It doesn't matter as I think the game is quality. Just intersted, thats all.

Cyclone wrote:
> Ant:

In N64 mag, their index has over 300 games in it.

WDC,
> Rush 2049, both have a lot of good points, and easily look better
> than GT2, while have a huge game underneath.

Perfect Dark beats
> MGS hands down - Graphics, size, weaponry, charecters, multiplayer,
> length, etc. I liked MGS, it was a great game, but Perfect Dark is
> better, although a little different.

Crash? Crahs is just 30/35
> levels (a lot yes) of running away from, or towards the screen.
> Mario- 15, fully 3d levels, and he alone has more moves thatn Crash
> has. DK64 - 8 massive levels - 4,000 bannanas to collect, 201 golden
> bannanas etc. Crash is no comparison.

MGS has the best plot and storyline EVER though, and I prefer MGS because of that. But remember, PDark did come out on a more powerful console 2 years later.

Okay, if not Crash then...Spyro. Those levels are full 3D, and it takes a long time to complete!!

Is Mario64 a platformer, though?? I always thought a platformer was like Crash, where you just run down one little pathway. I suppose they've evolved since then.

But I still reckon that GT2 is the best racer out there, I mean, over 600 cars, good graphics and some superb gameplay, it deserves to be.

M16 wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> Cyclone wrote:
> A few points:

1. I see no
> '2' after the
> title for this thread, so
> Ant, stop saying
> the PS2 has this
> and that; (128 bit etc)

2. The
> N64
> has at least 300 games,
> which is more than enougfh.

3. If
> you
> put a top 10 list of
> games from say, N64 mag, and
> put them up
> against the top 10
> games of Playstation mag,
> you would see a clear
> difference in
> graphics, size (all
> the games, not just FF7,8,9) and
> gameplay,
> with the N64
> coming out as a clear winner.

4. Yes N64
> mag
> is a
> good read. Better than those narrow minded NOM people.

Hey,
>
> I ony mentioned it a couple of times, and I was only using it
> as
> reference.

At least 300 games??? Well, I've only ever
> seen about
> 100.

Also, maybe in graphics, but in gameplay??
> No racer compares
> to GT2, no shoot 'em up in my opinion lives
> up to the sheer
> brilliance of MGS and Zelda is the only one
> that can match up to
> Final Fantasy.

Also, Crash would give
> games such as Banjo and
> even Mario64 a run for their
> money.

Actually, I think it would be
> very close.


I
> haven't played the latest Crash games, so I would like to know if
> they are true 3D, like Mario. Or are they still the same as Crash2?
> It doesn't matter as I think the game is quality. Just intersted,
> thats all.

Crash 3 has a lot more room to move, but isn't true 3D.

yeah urs ant

Ant wrote:
> M16 wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> Cyclone wrote:
> A few
> points:

1. I see no
> '2' after the
> title for this
> thread, so
> Ant, stop saying
> the PS2 has this
> and
> that; (128 bit etc)

2. The
> N64
> has at least 300
> games,
> which is more than enougfh.

3. If
> you
>
> put a top 10 list of
> games from say, N64 mag, and
> put
> them up
> against the top 10
> games of Playstation
> mag,
> you would see a clear
> difference in
> graphics,
> size (all
> the games, not just FF7,8,9) and
>
> gameplay,
> with the N64
> coming out as a clear
> winner.

4. Yes N64
> mag
> is a
> good read. Better
> than those narrow minded NOM people.

Hey,
>
> I ony
> mentioned it a couple of times, and I was only using it
>
> as
> reference.

At least 300 games??? Well, I've only
> ever
> seen about
> 100.

Also, maybe in graphics, but in
> gameplay??
> No racer compares
> to GT2, no shoot 'em up in
> my opinion lives
> up to the sheer
> brilliance of MGS and
> Zelda is the only one
> that can match up to
> Final
> Fantasy.

Also, Crash would give
> games such as Banjo
> and
> even Mario64 a run for their
> money.

Actually, I
> think it would be
> very close.


I
> haven't played the
> latest Crash games, so I would like to know if
> they are true
> 3D, like Mario. Or are they still the same as Crash2?
> It
> doesn't matter as I think the game is quality. Just intersted,
>
> thats all.

Crash 3 has a lot more room to move, but isn't true
> 3D.

Okay, cheers