Viewing Thread:
"Halo Fan *is* Belldandy"

*waves and smiles*
Hello you puckish scamp.

Of course, we'll pretend you're not for the benefit of everyone else.
"Deterring Democracy" indeed

*chuckles*

All fun and games here then?
Can I touch someone's boobies?

Can you at least give the reason why you can't say? Or would that give it away?

I'm not saying I think that Halo Fan is or isn't Belldandy, but what I will say is this: I find it interesting that Belldandy is away for weeks (I think roughly translated that means "forever", I'm don't speak fluent Belldandy), only to return when his name is mentioned. Also, I found it odd that earlier he replied to all the other threads except the "Newbie's Lament" one from Halo Fan, when it was clearly on the same issue.

Both could clearly be nothing at all, I just found them interesting.

The pumpkin fish ate my barnacle.

Unfortunately I can't say how.
I *really* wish I could, because then it wouldn't look like "some Notable attacking a newbie"

But hell, you find me one single solitary newbie that I have ever attacked and I'll apologise to their face, I'm usually defending them until they start that "i liyke ps2 it smash da gaycube" crap.
Especially a newbie that posts intelligent and reasonable stuff, no way am I going to start harassing someone like that.

Until it turns out to be Belldandy - and then my contempt for a know-nothing, braggard USA puppet poster compels me to react and mark him out as the pocket knowitall he is.

Eh Bell? You know I'm right, and that's all that matters.

You discovered....the same IP?

Belldandy wrote:
> Wow, so many replies, but mainly from the same person. The amusing
> thing is that if you follow the logic that every newbie who dares to
> contradict some of you is in fact me, then this will be one dead
> forum.
--

What's really strange is that you - sorry - Halo Fan didn't disagree with me at all. He was talking about Chomsky and I did too, we discussed the notion that all countries are complicit in supporting terrorism etc etc.

But then, thanks to some innerweb bomb-checkity, voila - what do I discover?...well, we both know what I discover.

Personally I dont know why couldnt just post your thoughts under your own name instead of using another account, then it struck me:
After your "I was wait for it..wrong" thread, where you swerved through 180 degree opinion change only to then claim "it was just a test for reactions" - you realised that you'd never be taken seriously as anyone with intelligence again.

And you'll prove me correct by denying the Halo Dandy effect - whilst you and I both know what the score is.

Blank wrote:
> It always asks me to log in, because I've set it to "log in each
> time". It's really quite simple.

Isn't that rather pointless ? I suppose it's okay if someone else in your family uses the PC, point is that mine's set up the other way.

Oh yeah, but the shortened version is "etc.", as each letter doesn't stand for anything and there are no letters in between. :)

Blank wrote:
> And I believe it's "etc.", not "e.t.c.".

And I believe it's 'et cetera' not 'etc.'.

;c)

Or it's etc...

Whichever you prefer. :c)

It always asks me to log in, because I've set it to "log in each time". It's really quite simple.