The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Come on who would be a better notable than me?...well I can think of a few but still I wouldn't be half bad. I have won 2 GADs here, have been here for a long time, am always up for lively debates, I'm opinionated and the creator of the Official Poetry and Hai-ku thread. It may not have been a great success but at least I had the initiative and the support of fellow forum members to put it into action. I'm sure you can all think of other great pros and cons but the message is still VOTE CUBIST :D
**Hands out little blue and red campaign badges** HUZZAH!
**Hands out little blue and red campaign badges** HUZZAH!
Page:
Wobbly Sumo wrote:
> Look 'crazycol' - people WOULD have voted for you if you had not been
> so annoying. If you had put up some decent, intersting posts that
> people would be intersted instead of the child and idiotic gibberish
> which you forced upon us, people may have gained a few tiny ounces of
> respect for you, but as it is you will NEVER become a notable at this
> rate.
>
> Even if you do get to become a regular, people will vote to get you
> banned not notable.
>
> I am new new - 32 days. And I know that is why I should not really be
> a notable. Notables should be people who consistantly put up good
> messages, posts and topics. Perhaps one day I will be. But nowhere
> near yet!
>
> Get yourself a life. You have been here even less than me - people
> will not vote if you spam. And don't leave and rejoin under a new
> name. That will not work either, UNLESS you post consistently good
> topics and gain respect the propper way.
Well If you've been here 32 days, and I've been here 83 days. Are you sure your statement 'You have been here even less than me' is correct?
> Look 'crazycol' - people WOULD have voted for you if you had not been
> so annoying. If you had put up some decent, intersting posts that
> people would be intersted instead of the child and idiotic gibberish
> which you forced upon us, people may have gained a few tiny ounces of
> respect for you, but as it is you will NEVER become a notable at this
> rate.
>
> Even if you do get to become a regular, people will vote to get you
> banned not notable.
>
> I am new new - 32 days. And I know that is why I should not really be
> a notable. Notables should be people who consistantly put up good
> messages, posts and topics. Perhaps one day I will be. But nowhere
> near yet!
>
> Get yourself a life. You have been here even less than me - people
> will not vote if you spam. And don't leave and rejoin under a new
> name. That will not work either, UNLESS you post consistently good
> topics and gain respect the propper way.
Well If you've been here 32 days, and I've been here 83 days. Are you sure your statement 'You have been here even less than me' is correct?
oldmanfunk wrote:
> How can people get so annoyed over an online chatroom, your never
> going meet any of these people. So why take offense from them? For all
> you know we could all be 8 year olds that dont have a clue about
> anything. So just dont take everything to heart ok?
But, by that logic, there could be a really influential Magazine Editor on here looking for new talent...
> How can people get so annoyed over an online chatroom, your never
> going meet any of these people. So why take offense from them? For all
> you know we could all be 8 year olds that dont have a clue about
> anything. So just dont take everything to heart ok?
But, by that logic, there could be a really influential Magazine Editor on here looking for new talent...
How can people get so annoyed over an online chatroom, your never going meet any of these people. So why take offense from them? For all you know we could all be 8 year olds that dont have a clue about anything. So just dont take everything to heart ok?
Well the n00bs can form a little clique if they want. Either way they can't vote or get voted.
Wobbly Sumo wrote:
> Look 'crazycol' - people WOULD have voted for you if you had not been
> so annoying.
Well, er, I wouldn't.
> Look 'crazycol' - people WOULD have voted for you if you had not been
> so annoying.
Well, er, I wouldn't.
English_Bloke wrote:
> “You wanna be in my gang, my gang, my gang?”
>
> Um, not really Gary no.
lol.
> “You wanna be in my gang, my gang, my gang?”
>
> Um, not really Gary no.
lol.
“You wanna be in my gang, my gang, my gang?”
Um, not really Gary no.
Um, not really Gary no.
I'm the drunk, but loveable 2nd in command.
crazycol wrote:
> The newbies are rising up just like I predictided. And I'm the leader.
The only leader you can be compared to is Gary Glitter.
> The newbies are rising up just like I predictided. And I'm the leader.
The only leader you can be compared to is Gary Glitter.
The newbies are rising up just like I predictided. And I'm the leader.
Page: