Viewing Thread:
"Greedy 'Bush'tard"

Basically this is my views on the current situation in Iraq.

George Bush, like most American's is a power crazed idiot with too many weapons at his disposal, and an unnerving lust for blood. He wants to go to war with anyone who stands in his countries way, quite simply because he can. Another reason is that Iraq has an abundance of oilfields and America are becoming ever-more industrialised and need the oil for petrol and to be refined into plastics to make those little lids they have at McDonalds.

Bush will use his stupid hick/monkey controlled planes to bomb the Iraqis because they dared stant up for themselves in a world dominated by the (quite literal) shadow of the obese Americans who need more wealth and power so they can make yet another national holiday and use it as an excuse to get fatter and eat ribs and drink cheap ale.

Did you know that in the gulf war, most of the British casualties were caused by 'friendly fire' from the Yanks who get wasted the night before going on a mission and get so excited at having live ammo that they shoot anything and everything in their sight. Bush has programmed his army of hicks and dysfunctional yanks to kill anything in the name of peace but the U.S.A is the greatest threat both economically and socially to the world.

I really needed to say alot of this because i had alot of stuff swimming about in my head, now im much clearer. Thanks.

Kyz

Why the sudden anti-capitalist, anti-McDonalds sentiments?

You all enjoy the fruits of capitalism, don't pretend to be a die-hard Socialist - anyone can say these things from the relative security of a computer, why don't you adhere to them

Kyz22 wrote:
> I was speaking generally and assume you are just one of those people
> who enjoys putting "ism" and "ist" on the end of
> words to make yourself look important.
>
> I suppose if I pick a flower im a "flowerist" and if I step
> on a snail im "snailist"
>
> pfft!

How exactly was what you wrote 'speaking generally'? I give up. I'm sick of people making ludicrous statements based on the tiny amount of knowledge of the subject they have, half of which is usually wrong anyway. Which I've been guilty of myself, but at least I'm making an effort to educate myself about the subject, rather than throwing around unfounded stupid statements.

And yes, I still think your an idiotist :-p

Kyz22 wrote:
> Basically this is my views on the current situation in Iraq.
>
> George Bush, like most American's is a power crazed idiot with too
> many weapons at his disposal, and an unnerving lust for blood.

Won't even bother to comment on this it's stupid enough without me picking it to pieces

He
> wants to go to war with anyone who stands in his countries way, quite
> simply because he can. Another reason is that Iraq has an abundance of
> oilfields and America are becoming ever-more industrialised and need
> the oil for petrol and to be refined into plastics to make those
> little lids they have at McDonalds.

assumption but hey we're all entitled to those

>
> Bush will use his stupid hick/monkey controlled planes to bomb the
> Iraqis

They've got some of the best pilots in the world actually so exactly what factual basis do you have for this comment? I haven't seen a monkey fly a plane on it's own but hey i'm always open for being proved wrong.

> a world dominated by the (quite literal) shadow of the obese Americans )>who need more wealth and power so they can make yet another national >holiday and use it as an excuse to get fatter and eat ribs and drink >cheap ale.

Although i'm not too big on polls and surveys i did see one which caught my eye, which gave the top 10 fattest nations in the world. France were first, USA were 6th and us brits only slightly behind in 8th. However once again this is stupid enough without me picking it to pieces.

>
> Did you know that in the gulf war, most of the British casualties were
> caused by 'friendly fire' from the Yanks who get wasted the night
> before going on a mission and get so excited at having live ammo that
> they shoot anything and everything in their sight. Bush has programmed
> his army of hicks and dysfunctional yanks to kill anything in the name
> of peace but the U.S.A is the greatest threat both economically and
> socially to the world.

yawn!! ok whatever you say *sighs*



If you're going to post something at least post something with at least some facts in it and try not to let your blatant ignorant, anti-american views get in the way of it next time please. thank you :)

I was speaking generally and assume you are just one of those people who enjoys putting "ism" and "ist" on the end of words to make yourself look important.

I suppose if I pick a flower im a "flowerist" and if I step on a snail im "snailist"

pfft!

Kyz22 wrote:
> I just think that the USA crave a war because they want a
> chance to show off their new technology and firepower, thats all.

This line above all demonstrates to me your utter lack of comprehension of the subject. Not to mention your needlessly generalising racial slur of the American people. I suppose that the French smell, Chinese are all slitty-eyed and can't talk proper and that P***'s can't be trusted as well huh?

You show exactly the ill-informed useless opinions that you ascribe to the Americans, many of whom, it must be noted, are well-informed of the situation, and are actively demonstrating for the anti-war movement.

I am not against a war in any form and when the UN weapons inspectors find some weapons (It is inevitable they will) go ahead. I realise Saddam poses a threat to the world and I can comnpletely understand the justification of war. I aren't one of those idiots who is going to stand infront of the Iraq Embassy trying to get the US bombers to not bomb it. I just think that the USA crave a war because they want a chance to show off their new technology and firepower, thats all.

Don't sit on the fence Snuggly, the above post is a lot of the anti-war rhetoric we've come to expect. Conversely, I hate the opposing view from Joe Public that everything is fine as long as its done with a second UN resolution, because people just saying that satifies their conscience about sending people to die. Basically, it's shifting the buck - 'not in our name', no, but in the UN's? That's ok then. Me? Whilst I am against war for the obvious humanitarian implications, its pretty obvious Saddam is a danger, if not directly to us then to others

Of course he has WOMD and he's unstable dictator etc etc

What really annoys me is America and Britain's hypocrisy about the whole issue.

It's very easy to go along with majority (not saying you've done this) and say "uuur Bush look like a monkey, he's a murderer, blah blah blah" but you have to see both sides of the argument. Despite whatever he says and what people will have you believe, it's obvious Saddam does have the weapons of mass destruction, and while he may not be in any hurry to use them on us, who knows what he'd do if we left him in power? Bombing the crap out of him may not be the answer.

Anyone who thinks Saddam has nothing to hide is a naieve fool.

No offence but I hate people that come across all anti-American and know little facts about the situation

Like your average Joe Bloggs who hears an opinion poll suggest people are against a war " Aye me to... damn Americans... Bush's poodle... all about oil ".

That's what your post was like