The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> Not really, his evidence is sound. It doesn't prove the wider point
> he's trying to make but he gave his argument a good basis with those
> examples.
It's not sound evidence though, it's just coincidental. Like I said, all Xbox games are on DVDs but that doesn't mean every single game is good. He can scream "xbox isn't pc" until he's blue in the face, but there isn't actually any reason why it'd be true for one format and not another.
I could name 3 good games that are on CDs, but it doesn't mean any other game I buy on CD will be good.
and before this thing kicks off again, I'd like it duly noted that I have a feeling Hedfix is just trying to play devil's advocate.
> Thinking about it hedfix you're right, as they have added the gameplay
> elements that were not in the PC one.
That's what I meant.
I'm sneaky me. ;)
> odwyer wrote:
> Far Cry
> Half life 2
> GTA San Andreas.
>
> 3 games on DVD Rom.
>
> Hardly crap are they? So it's pretty much a safe bet that this game
> could be the same.
>
> That's how I came to the conclusion.
>
> Pretty obvious really.
>
> I think you've earned the right to be mocked and jeered, really.
Not really, his evidence is sound. It doesn't prove the wider point he's trying to make but he gave his argument a good basis with those examples.
hahahaha
> Hedfix wrote:
> You could also argue that Far Cry has been 'expanded' rather than
> 'cut-down'.
>
> You could argue but you'd be wrong.
>
> Farcry on the xbox is a completly different game they have changed
> loads of the gameplay.
Oh "completely different" like 're-approached' and 'expanded'?
Way to prove my point.
> Mate, you have no ability to have a conversation. That's the flaw in
> your argument.
bahahahaha
Keep avoiding my questions then. You've realised by now that your DVD Rom argument is absolutely ridiculous. There's no need to stoop to pettiness. If my argument is so 'flawed' why do you have no reply to any of it?