The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
at 12.15 today i left school got on the bus and wen straight to the nearest cinema to watch the greatest middle film of a trilogy. WAT A FILM!!!!!! It was much better than the first one and that takes some beating. Although Christopher Lee's not in a lot, great battle scenes and great effects. Totally brilliant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! there's no way u can miss this one it's superb!!!!!!! sorry that i haven't given more detail in this post but i didn't want to spoil the film.
Page:
Should be seeing it tommorow at 4pm if its not fully booked.
MoJoJoJo wrote:
> You mean apart from the fact that they looked fake? That you could
> tell they were computer generated? That every effect shot looked pap?
> Oh, nothing, they were just fine
>
> On the trailer I saw that little monster thing whom the ring used to
> belong to. Still looked fake. Therefore, the effects in Two Towers are
> also fake looking, even if everything else looks better
Well if u go by that logic then you musn't be watching many films at all as most of them has computer generated material in it and although some may look more "realistic" than others you'd still know it's computer generated so surely you'd just complain about that as well. Anyway Gollum did look computer generated i must admit. But that is the only way in which Peter Jackson could have created such a weird looking creature. how do you suggest peter jackson should over come this? get a guy running around in a crappy costume pretending to be some supernatural creature?????! for some who pretend to be an evil monkey scientist ure pretty dumb!
> You mean apart from the fact that they looked fake? That you could
> tell they were computer generated? That every effect shot looked pap?
> Oh, nothing, they were just fine
>
> On the trailer I saw that little monster thing whom the ring used to
> belong to. Still looked fake. Therefore, the effects in Two Towers are
> also fake looking, even if everything else looks better
Well if u go by that logic then you musn't be watching many films at all as most of them has computer generated material in it and although some may look more "realistic" than others you'd still know it's computer generated so surely you'd just complain about that as well. Anyway Gollum did look computer generated i must admit. But that is the only way in which Peter Jackson could have created such a weird looking creature. how do you suggest peter jackson should over come this? get a guy running around in a crappy costume pretending to be some supernatural creature?????! for some who pretend to be an evil monkey scientist ure pretty dumb!
G®åpô²ºº² wrote:
And the effects are brilliant - how were the first films effects below par?
------
You mean apart from the fact that they looked fake? That you could tell they were computer generated? That every effect shot looked pap? Oh, nothing, they were just fine
On the trailer I saw that little monster thing whom the ring used to belong to. Still looked fake. Therefore, the effects in Two Towers are also fake looking, even if everything else looks better
And the effects are brilliant - how were the first films effects below par?
------
You mean apart from the fact that they looked fake? That you could tell they were computer generated? That every effect shot looked pap? Oh, nothing, they were just fine
On the trailer I saw that little monster thing whom the ring used to belong to. Still looked fake. Therefore, the effects in Two Towers are also fake looking, even if everything else looks better
It ends with anticipation as gollum says - "i will take them to her" but who is HER! yeh thats what the lame person would say
Ah well.
We'll still see it/her in the third. I suppose an ending on such a climax would kinda make it harder to sell the story (such an abrupt end etc)
We'll still see it/her in the third. I suppose an ending on such a climax would kinda make it harder to sell the story (such an abrupt end etc)
Yeh its shelob, i wasnt going to spoil it for those who havnt read the book. And the effects are brilliant - how were the first films effects below par?
The effects are the same as the last one - below average
Still, I'm planning on going to see it... though I've said that about every recent film (xXx, Die Another Day etc etc) but I haven't seen a film at the cinema since Episode 2, and Blade 2 before that... I need to get to the cinema more often!
Still, I'm planning on going to see it... though I've said that about every recent film (xXx, Die Another Day etc etc) but I haven't seen a film at the cinema since Episode 2, and Blade 2 before that... I need to get to the cinema more often!
Isn't that Shelob?
One big mistake in the ending - they missed a bit from the book out and are going to put it in the next one
Is it better than the book because that ruled.
Page: