The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
what do you think of it compared to 1
Page:
lg max wrote:
> i think that episode 2 attack of the clones totaly wipes the floor
> with phantom menace. I thought that the first one had litte plot and
> that a 3 year old colud do a lot better.
> i cant wait untill the third one comes out in aroun 2005
God, 2 years time. It's a lot of time between then and now.
Did you know that in 2004 a satellite heading to Uranus will land on it and then give us loads of info on what it's atmosphere is like.
> i think that episode 2 attack of the clones totaly wipes the floor
> with phantom menace. I thought that the first one had litte plot and
> that a 3 year old colud do a lot better.
> i cant wait untill the third one comes out in aroun 2005
God, 2 years time. It's a lot of time between then and now.
Did you know that in 2004 a satellite heading to Uranus will land on it and then give us loads of info on what it's atmosphere is like.
i think that episode 2 attack of the clones totaly wipes the floor with phantom menace. I thought that the first one had litte plot and that a 3 year old colud do a lot better.
i cant wait untill the third one comes out in aroun 2005
i cant wait untill the third one comes out in aroun 2005
Armatige Shanks wrote:
> That made me laugh :)
-------
Like most people, you judged Armageddon after watching it once. Heck, even *I* hated it the first couple of times. But I watched it again and again, and it became evident just how excellent it is. The camera angles, the camera work, the slow motion sequences - all excellent. And that's how I watch films nowadays, for the style. That way, even Pearl Harbour and Titanic are enjoyable
> That made me laugh :)
-------
Like most people, you judged Armageddon after watching it once. Heck, even *I* hated it the first couple of times. But I watched it again and again, and it became evident just how excellent it is. The camera angles, the camera work, the slow motion sequences - all excellent. And that's how I watch films nowadays, for the style. That way, even Pearl Harbour and Titanic are enjoyable
Armatige Shanks wrote:
> That made me laugh :)
Okay then laughing boy, what are YOUR ideas of great films ?
~~Belldandy~~
> That made me laugh :)
Okay then laughing boy, what are YOUR ideas of great films ?
~~Belldandy~~
Belldandy wrote:
> Armageddon is,without a doubt, a modern classic, as is Black Hawk Down
> :)
That made me laugh :)
> Armageddon is,without a doubt, a modern classic, as is Black Hawk Down
> :)
That made me laugh :)
Out of these two films would you consider to be the best?:
Star Trek X: Nemesis
or
Starwars Episode II Attack of the Clones
????????
Star Trek X: Nemesis
or
Starwars Episode II Attack of the Clones
????????
Goatboy wrote:
> I think a few million religious folk would disagree there.
Maybe, I suppose the bible could be the greatest fictitious story ever told as well... *waits to see how many he has angered :)* Still think Lord Of The Rings is better though, I mean virgin birth ? Son of god ? LOTR is far more plausible !
~~Belldandy~~
> I think a few million religious folk would disagree there.
Maybe, I suppose the bible could be the greatest fictitious story ever told as well... *waits to see how many he has angered :)* Still think Lord Of The Rings is better though, I mean virgin birth ? Son of god ? LOTR is far more plausible !
~~Belldandy~~
"Willow - sucked, badly.
Indiana Jones - worse franchise than James Bond, okay at the time but dated now, badly, and boring."
I... can't comprehend... what you... just said....
Willow... sucked badly?
Indiana Jones... boring?
*hangs himself*
*comes back to haunt*
Indiana Jones - worse franchise than James Bond, okay at the time but dated now, badly, and boring."
I... can't comprehend... what you... just said....
Willow... sucked badly?
Indiana Jones... boring?
*hangs himself*
*comes back to haunt*
:-D
Page: