The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://gamesradar.msn.co.uk/news/default.asp? (space)subsectionid=159&articleid=64281&pagetype=2
(I realise this post may come back to haunt me)
> I agree. Everyone has been raving about '13', the forthcoming
> cel-shaded FPS - but for me, it an FPS just isn't suited to that style
> of graphics.
I dunno... for me, it depeneds much more on level design...
If they manage to put everything together properley, I reckon it will be quite a lot of fun?
"Perfect Dark 2 will rock" during Nintendo only period for that game.
"Yes it will, will smash stupid Halo"
"Yes"
Except now it's not on the Gamecube?
"Stupid game, looks cartoony"
CARTOONY?
Do I hear the fevered goo-goo protestations from Nintendo fans about a game looking cartoony?
Please, your denial is beneath you and thanks to the use of hallucinagenics?
I see through you.
Face it goobers, you loved the idea of this game and crowed like big crowing people until RARE ABANDONED NINTENDO.
Get over it, you can always play Smashy Smashy Smoosh Smush or something.
Heh heh
> Well if you insist I think X-Box will keep it and if you don't like
> cartoony games can they have Zelda aswell?
I agree. Everyone has been raving about '13', the forthcoming cel-shaded FPS - but for me, it an FPS just isn't suited to that style of graphics.
> Well if you insist I think X-Box will keep it and if you don't like
> cartoony games can they have Zelda aswell? That has deffinetly
> suffered from going cell shaded instead of the usuall. (so many post's
> on how childish the graphics are :S )
Better give em Mario as well... god damn carton graphics!...
Hold on... a Ninty complaining about kiddy graphics???
Do you think that this new look could be an attempt to get the game (and therefore Xbox itself) to sell better in Japan? It very 'Manga' after all.
http://gamesradar.msn.co.uk/news/default.asp? (space)subsectionid=159&articleid=64281&pagetype=2
(I realise this post may come back to haunt me)