Viewing Thread:
"You demand evidence of inequality here it is:"

I was told by many people, including Loki to put up or shut up with regards to evidence of inequality and favouritism on this forum, so here it is:

-------------

1:


http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/ display_messages.php?forumid=416&threadid= 50771&offset=40¤tsort=desc

(Delete 2 Spaces)

This first link, is to a post where homosexuality, is the key issue, sheepy one of you beloved notable says "you are gay" and Mr Chainsaw shares his thoughts on it as the threads starter. This was not written in a jokey tone as is to the same extent as Ashleys homophobic and bigoted! (and if you claim the moderators didn't see it they must be blind as its called: "Why are you all so gay?")

2:

http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/display_messages.php? forumid=416&threadid= 46229&offset=0¤tsort=desc

(Remove 2 Spaces)

Oh, whats this. "we don't give mystique special priveledges she is treated the same". Oh well it strikes me as surprising that she posts a filthy joke and it is removed clearly by a member of staff saying it was filthy and unsuitable. And more of your much loved notables and respected regulars (about 10 off them) mention that it is an offence which is worthy of banning. But what happens it is miraculously censored by a member of staff and everything is dropped.

3:

http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/ display_messages.php?threadid =52940&forumid=416

(Delete 2 Spaces)

Oh look again. (sorry mystique not piF**king on you but you are the worst offender) Mystique the person all the staff just happened to vote for in the noteable elections, posts a link to an obscene website which screams F*F**k you, which was viewed by a younger member of the site who complained that there parents were in the next room and they could have got into all sorts of trouble.

******Sarcasm*******

I am glad to see that there is equality on this site, its just a shame that some people are more equal than others. All these messages are being popped or you can use the links, but here is the precious evidence you wanted! I suggest you try to be more fair in the future and admit that we were right as favouritism is clearly demonstrated!

Scouse Tw@t wrote:
> Besides, I only call myself this, so people know what they're dealing
> with. I am a Tw@t, is that so hard to understand?

For me? no.

For the mother who's 10 year old child turns around from the computer screen and asks her what a Scouse Tw@t is, maybe.

Go right ahead, if the cap fits...

Besides, I only call myself this, so people know what they're dealing with. I am a Tw@t, is that so hard to understand?

Goatboy wrote:
> No, I'd laugh a lot and get really red-faced.
> I think the difference here is, although there have been times when
> we've certainly had our hissy fits at each other, it's never
> degenerated into childish name-calling and personal insults.

Well, I just don't *DO* name-calling, since it's what you resort to when you've lost an argument.

"Oh yeah? well.. well... you're a big stupid man!!!"

top argument winning material.

No-one has answered my query on Scouse Tw@ts name.

I assume I'm free to call myself Cnut Fcuker or something?

Oliver Stone would love this thread.

Just add some shaky 16mm footage and an Indian smoking pot and I'd watch it.

Isn't this all going a bit far now children ??

Ashley was banned cos he chose to break the rules - simple.

Ashley doesn't want to re-register - that's his choice too.

Let him fight his own battle - If he want's to come back so desperatly then it will take him about 2 minutes to register.

As Loki said - go and say hello to a few trees and bushes and things - listen to the birds and then watch the news and see what is really important.

* yawn *

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Mr Ripper wrote:

> Now comment on my "Scouse Tw@t" post please.
>
> Many thanks.

I'll do it for you. It's just a name. Now just chill, and shaddap.

You're all gay. Really.

Oops, was that a bad word children?

Mr Ripper wrote:
> For example, if I were to childishly call Goatboy a few names in the
> homosexual / necrophiliac / racist vein, this would be OK. But if I
> did it out of anger, I'd get banned?
---

No, I'd laugh a lot and get really red-faced.
I think the difference here is, although there have been times when we've certainly had our hissy fits at each other, it's never degenerated into childish name-calling and personal insults.

Regardless of the accusations of sexuality, it's the context and meaning behind a post that I think tips it from amusing to offensive.
I've called Grix a big gay welshman time and time again.
Because he is.
But it's good natured and he's equally free to suggest I play the gluey flute (which I dont. Because I'm not)

But when it descends into a couple of angry people being openly hostile, it's a completely different case.

Plus, at the end of the day, it's SRs forums and they can ban who they want for whatever reason.
And until The Internet Police arrest them, I think we should all just get on with life and smoke/swear/listen to heavy metal and enjoy life.

You big pink cowboy.

SHEEPY wrote:
> I think Hybird is great!
>
> :D

i think that was stupidly random

:D

I think Hybird is great!

:D