The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
A while back somebody created a thread for people to give their site address for people to view, comment upon, etc..
Which I thought was a pretty cool thread, I enjoyed visiting members sites, seeing what they had done...
Unfortunately, I seem to remember that thread kinda degenerated into an argument about whether people were web designers or not?? ... I dunno...
Recently, I’ve seen a few 'criticise my site' threads about, which seemed to be doing pretty much the same thing, but on an more individual scale...
I was thinking that maybe we people could stick links to sites thy have created in this thread so people could compare, and discuss what we had done, how to improve, get some new ideas and some fresh perspectives?
Which I thought was a pretty cool thread, I enjoyed visiting members sites, seeing what they had done...
Unfortunately, I seem to remember that thread kinda degenerated into an argument about whether people were web designers or not?? ... I dunno...
Recently, I’ve seen a few 'criticise my site' threads about, which seemed to be doing pretty much the same thing, but on an more individual scale...
I was thinking that maybe we people could stick links to sites thy have created in this thread so people could compare, and discuss what we had done, how to improve, get some new ideas and some fresh perspectives?
Page:
Nimco wrote:
> I'm up for that:
>
> - http://www.knight-sites.co.uk (ive already had feedback on this,
> but if there are any new people out there who wanna see it... ;) )
I like this, the colours are really good. I would say at a left margin to the block text though. It's too close to the line thing.
>
> - http://www.great-dunmow.co.uk (perhaps my favourite site i've
> designed)
Again, left margin is my only comment.
> - http://172.186.117.16/dunmow/ (the updated version of the site
> above - running off my pc, so it wont be available after 2nite coz i
> d/c around 10:30pm)
>
> - http://www.the-starr.co.uk (my most recent site)
Hrm. I would recommend changing the top-right graphic. It has that naff I-did-this-in-Front-Page look. Create an irregular select round the original and feather the selection by 5px to give it that professional look.
> - http://www.dcfloridahomes.co.uk (not a bad site - trying out some
> new things on that one)
And this one is horribly broken: http://io.mine.nu/turbonutter/stuff/ screenshot20020617201030.png (SPACE)
:-)
> I'm up for that:
>
> - http://www.knight-sites.co.uk (ive already had feedback on this,
> but if there are any new people out there who wanna see it... ;) )
I like this, the colours are really good. I would say at a left margin to the block text though. It's too close to the line thing.
>
> - http://www.great-dunmow.co.uk (perhaps my favourite site i've
> designed)
Again, left margin is my only comment.
> - http://172.186.117.16/dunmow/ (the updated version of the site
> above - running off my pc, so it wont be available after 2nite coz i
> d/c around 10:30pm)
>
> - http://www.the-starr.co.uk (my most recent site)
Hrm. I would recommend changing the top-right graphic. It has that naff I-did-this-in-Front-Page look. Create an irregular select round the original and feather the selection by 5px to give it that professional look.
> - http://www.dcfloridahomes.co.uk (not a bad site - trying out some
> new things on that one)
And this one is horribly broken: http://io.mine.nu/turbonutter/stuff/ screenshot20020617201030.png (SPACE)
:-)
Great idea.
http://io.mine.nu/turbonutter/
Don't comment on the background being large, we've had it out before :-)
http://io.mine.nu/turbonutter/
Don't comment on the background being large, we've had it out before :-)
I'm up for that:
- http://www.knight-sites.co.uk (ive already had feedback on this, but if there are any new people out there who wanna see it... ;) )
- http://www.great-dunmow.co.uk (perhaps my favourite site i've designed)
- http://172.186.117.16/dunmow/ (the updated version of the site above - running off my pc, so it wont be available after 2nite coz i d/c around 10:30pm)
- http://www.the-starr.co.uk (my most recent site)
- http://www.dcfloridahomes.co.uk (not a bad site - trying out some new things on that one)
- http://www.knight-sites.co.uk (ive already had feedback on this, but if there are any new people out there who wanna see it... ;) )
- http://www.great-dunmow.co.uk (perhaps my favourite site i've designed)
- http://172.186.117.16/dunmow/ (the updated version of the site above - running off my pc, so it wont be available after 2nite coz i d/c around 10:30pm)
- http://www.the-starr.co.uk (my most recent site)
- http://www.dcfloridahomes.co.uk (not a bad site - trying out some new things on that one)
A while back somebody created a thread for people to give their site address for people to view, comment upon, etc..
Which I thought was a pretty cool thread, I enjoyed visiting members sites, seeing what they had done...
Unfortunately, I seem to remember that thread kinda degenerated into an argument about whether people were web designers or not?? ... I dunno...
Recently, I’ve seen a few 'criticise my site' threads about, which seemed to be doing pretty much the same thing, but on an more individual scale...
I was thinking that maybe we people could stick links to sites thy have created in this thread so people could compare, and discuss what we had done, how to improve, get some new ideas and some fresh perspectives?
Which I thought was a pretty cool thread, I enjoyed visiting members sites, seeing what they had done...
Unfortunately, I seem to remember that thread kinda degenerated into an argument about whether people were web designers or not?? ... I dunno...
Recently, I’ve seen a few 'criticise my site' threads about, which seemed to be doing pretty much the same thing, but on an more individual scale...
I was thinking that maybe we people could stick links to sites thy have created in this thread so people could compare, and discuss what we had done, how to improve, get some new ideas and some fresh perspectives?
Page: