The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Which I thought was a pretty cool thread, I enjoyed visiting members sites, seeing what they had done...
Unfortunately, I seem to remember that thread kinda degenerated into an argument about whether people were web designers or not?? ... I dunno...
Recently, I’ve seen a few 'criticise my site' threads about, which seemed to be doing pretty much the same thing, but on an more individual scale...
I was thinking that maybe we people could stick links to sites thy have created in this thread so people could compare, and discuss what we had done, how to improve, get some new ideas and some fresh perspectives?
They were constructed using WòókieeMøn§†€®'s rules for amateur site creation...
WòókieeMøn§†€® wrote:
> a) I don't claim to be a website designer!
> b) It was created using DreamWeaver
> c) I was not paid for it
> d) I'm not a graphic artist, so logos are very basic
> e) It was put together in spare time between work and playing games!
Their not very good, I know....
I stuck up both sites for a bit of fun... to see if I could create a non-FrontPage created site. Using Dreamweaver V1.? (I picked up off the cover of .Net a year or two back), and a trial copy of PSP
The results are... well, at best dubious :) ... There are a lot of very obvious cracks and flaws... So as long as you dont look too closely, you should be cool (myopic friendly web site?)
Just to explain 'the-quill'... (because it is that bad that it need explaining :) )... I was playing around with Pop-Ups at the time... and although Ive started changing it to a non-pop-up version, its a long way until its finally finished...
...
www.the-quill.com
www.cazbo.co.uk
It's really a site for me and my mates but any ideas about how I've designed it would be appreciated.
P.S. I know there are some dead links but I can't be bothered at the moment.
> That was my "Show Us Your Portfolio" thread, that went
> slightly off topic toward the end...
Thats the one!... I thought it was a shame things took a turn for the worse... people were putting up some really interesting stuff!
I'm off to see what people have put together...
> Tyla wrote:
> http://www.tyla.org.uk/babytyla/journal.html
> (Had to get this in really)
Cheers for the feedback on this but I forgot to mewntion that this is fed From Blogger.com so the content is fed from an XML source in the states into my site template. All the content is entered using IE and a Word GUI probably equalling the extra tags here and there and the wrong unicode...
Cheers again
> http://www.tyla.org.uk/babytyla/journal.html
> (Had to get this in really)
OK, I've had a look at this site as well... Well as far as I can tell, your links simply link to smaller pages breaking the 'updates' down by month. Rather than going through every monthly page individually, I will simply do the home page for you. So here goes....
First thing I came across in your code was the Character Encoding again. You have specified:
-
when you actually need to specify:
-
Secondly, was your usage of non-html characters without using the correct entity codes. The first was found in your June 10th 2002 entry, where you had written "£420" instead of "£420". The second was in the May 30th 2002 entry, where you had writen: "and to say it’s going to be tight". This looks OK, but actually the apostrophe you have used is an HTML entity, and looks as though it originated in MS Word or similar. To correct, replace with:
- "and to say it's going to be tight" [just a normal apostrophe].
Elsewhere in the code there are not too many errors. I will simply go through the ones detected by the W3C Validator. Firstly, you have tried to use the 'name' attribute for a