The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Just seen it in a preview screen at a cinema near me.
Great film. All the effects are really good and so is the story.
Some people say it's better than Star Wars but I have not seen that so I cannot say.
But the film is brill, if you haven't seen it already (cinemas near you might be previewing) I rocomend you see it, you won't be dissapointed.
Great film. All the effects are really good and so is the story.
Some people say it's better than Star Wars but I have not seen that so I cannot say.
But the film is brill, if you haven't seen it already (cinemas near you might be previewing) I rocomend you see it, you won't be dissapointed.
Page:
MoJoJoJo wrote:
You can blatantly tell when they've used a CG Spidey, the rest of the time it looks good, but when they used a CG Spidey or Goblin, it looked pitiful
Name one film where it doesn't look pitiful. Putting a CG man (not alien!) in the same shot as real men just doesn't work. Remember Blade 2? It looked terrible!
You can blatantly tell when they've used a CG Spidey, the rest of the time it looks good, but when they used a CG Spidey or Goblin, it looked pitiful
Name one film where it doesn't look pitiful. Putting a CG man (not alien!) in the same shot as real men just doesn't work. Remember Blade 2? It looked terrible!
Who cares if the CGI is good or not? Just so long as the film itself good, I couldn't care less.
Yeah OK the CG bits aren't good :D
Like near the start when he's climbing the walls in his wrestling costume :)
Like near the start when he's climbing the walls in his wrestling costume :)
Devil-Bøy wrote:
> Yes they are
--------
No. They're not. You can blatantly tell when they've used a CG Spidey, the rest of the time it looks good, but when they used a CG Spidey or Goblin, it looked pitiful
> Yes they are
--------
No. They're not. You can blatantly tell when they've used a CG Spidey, the rest of the time it looks good, but when they used a CG Spidey or Goblin, it looked pitiful
Yes they are, especially when he's climbing walls and hanging upsidedown.
Devil-Bøy wrote:
All the effects are really good
--------
No. They're not
There's no excuse for shoddy CGI, especially when they have a $100 million budget
All the effects are really good
--------
No. They're not
There's no excuse for shoddy CGI, especially when they have a $100 million budget
Just seen it in a preview screen at a cinema near me.
Great film. All the effects are really good and so is the story.
Some people say it's better than Star Wars but I have not seen that so I cannot say.
But the film is brill, if you haven't seen it already (cinemas near you might be previewing) I rocomend you see it, you won't be dissapointed.
Great film. All the effects are really good and so is the story.
Some people say it's better than Star Wars but I have not seen that so I cannot say.
But the film is brill, if you haven't seen it already (cinemas near you might be previewing) I rocomend you see it, you won't be dissapointed.
Page: