The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
WE WANT MORE DISCUSSIONS, MORE REVIEWS AND MORE CHEATS! IF THERE IS NO DISCUSSION FORUM FOR WHAT YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT, THEN YOU CAN CREATE ONE! RIGHT NOW, WE'RE LOOKING FOR GROUP DISCUSSIONS - MAYBE ON CLASSIC GAMES, AND THE HISTORY OF GAMING. REMEMBER THE GOOD OLD DAYS? IS THERE A GAME THAT YOU USED TO LOVE THAT YOU WANT TO REMINISCE - CAN YOU EVER REMEMBER IT'S NAME? WELL ASK SOMEONE, AND MAYBE SOMEONE ELSE WILL FILL YOU IN ON THE BLANKS. SO COME ON, SUBMIT ANYTHING TODAY, AND IT COULD BE YOU WITH A BRAND NEW GAME ON YOUR DOORSTEP - COURTESY OF UKGAMES.COM AND SPECIAL RESERVE.
Will intel or athlon invent a new super 'cool' processor that produces less heat or are we going to have to cope with oversized computers again?
Will intel or athlon invent a new super 'cool' processor that produces less heat or are we going to have to cope with oversized computers again?
> What does everyone think about playing Quake this way: one hand
> moves the character and does the general action gubbins, and the
> other hand holds a light gun, and actually fires at enemies that
> you can see on screen! Is this just a stupid idea, or could it
> actually be done? I think the Quake style of game has got a bit
I don't think your average gamer has the bodily co-ordination to do this... :)
> stale now, apart from better graphics and a few minimal changes
> nothing has really changed from the original Wolfenstein. Doe
Wolfenstein. I remember that - twas very good. On reflection, though, the sound effects were a bit crap.
Aaah, those were the days. :) I think I still have it on floppy disk somewhere (imagine that, a whole game on a floppy disk!). Maybe I'll play it again soon...
> sanyone else share this way of thinking, or am i just lost in a
> sea of Quakers?