Viewing Thread:
"Notable voting chat thread. Official. Because I said so."

I only set this up so that people DON'Y CHAT IN THE VOTING THREAD!

Also, we seem to get about a million of these on elecetion day, which is pointless, so try and keep it all in here. Cheers.

Chat about the election in here, who's going to win? Who doesn't deserve any votes? Who deserves more votes.

Jimmy Duck wrote:
> So you're saying that you can win agruements with out spooting
> mistakes.

Winning doesn't have to mean someone else made a mistake. It isn't even about the truth, it's just about making your point better. Look at the legal system for an example of this. You don't have to have done the crime to wind up doing the time.

I think we're drifting a bit off topic.

Insane Bartender wrote:

> I'm not avoiding anything,

Maybe not today you haven't, but that's your style. If you can't recognise that then there is little hope for you.

it's people like you that try to jump on
> me

Like I said, that's because I have an issue with the way you argue.

> I don't need to look for mistakes in you.

How else you gonna win this argument then? ;)

They are two poor excuses, and with kids coming to these forums...you outta be ashamed of yourself, the pair of you!
Now go! *points to basement* and I don't wanna see you here again until you have something good to say.

So you're saying that you can win agruements with out spooting mistakes.

Little Hobbo wrote:
> I've given my reason for arguing, what's his?

I'm not arguing. I'm replying.

Little Hobbo wrote:
> Nah, I'm arguing because I am very bored, and I have an issue with the
> way IB argues. A bit like Tommy Boyd on Talksport; avoiding the
> subject matter so as to gain victory through some small mistake that
> the other person has made. Only I haven't made any any mistakes yet.
> :)

I'm not avoiding anything, it's people like you that try to jump on me, don't ever forget that. I don't need to look for mistakes in you.

Undead wrote:

>
> But anyway IB, that's not the point, the point is, you are both not
> acting like primary school kids, you're acting like narky old men (and
> women). Are you too afraid to stop the petty arguments?

I've given my reason for arguing, what's his?

Votes for Edgy, heheh. he has to wait until Dringo gets home from a long hard day not doing much. Then they'll have dinner together, and Dringo will vote for Edgy. Edgy will vote for Dringo. This is how it works.

Insane Bartender wrote:
> Little Hobbo wrote:
> Quoting someones stupidity against them maybe, i agree. But my
> statement was of underlying accuracy, so stupidity does not enter
> the
> equation.
>
> OK. How many primary school rejects do you know of, and of those, how
> many have ever said: "I would expect a comment like that from a
> primary school reject".
>
> Not many, if any at all, so why would you expect it of them?
>


Although it is a technically inaccurate stereotype, it's one that I hoped you might understand.