The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I only set this up so that people DON'Y CHAT IN THE VOTING THREAD!
Also, we seem to get about a million of these on elecetion day, which is pointless, so try and keep it all in here. Cheers.
Chat about the election in here, who's going to win? Who doesn't deserve any votes? Who deserves more votes.
Also, we seem to get about a million of these on elecetion day, which is pointless, so try and keep it all in here. Cheers.
Chat about the election in here, who's going to win? Who doesn't deserve any votes? Who deserves more votes.
Page:
<:8 )~~Blaze~~( 8:> wrote:
> i dont know who to vote for?????????????
How about a sympathy vote for me?
> i dont know who to vote for?????????????
How about a sympathy vote for me?
Little Hobbo wrote:
> If thats what you mistake my light-hearted approach to being then so
> be it.
Hardly light-hearted, don't back down just because you have nothin left to say. As with everyone else who tries to push my patience and fails, I offer you my e-mail address, so you can continue this elsewhere, where it won't annoy people: [email protected]
GO!!
> I was merely responding to your post in a non-threatening manner.
er..no
> Shame on you for not realising that. Lighten up a bit, but continue
> arguing. Everyone benefits. Even if its just by adding a little
> smiley face on the end of your post to show that we know you are
> human. :)
I'll put a smiley on my post only when I'm smiling while postinig it. I don't smile that often.
> If thats what you mistake my light-hearted approach to being then so
> be it.
Hardly light-hearted, don't back down just because you have nothin left to say. As with everyone else who tries to push my patience and fails, I offer you my e-mail address, so you can continue this elsewhere, where it won't annoy people: [email protected]
GO!!
> I was merely responding to your post in a non-threatening manner.
er..no
> Shame on you for not realising that. Lighten up a bit, but continue
> arguing. Everyone benefits. Even if its just by adding a little
> smiley face on the end of your post to show that we know you are
> human. :)
I'll put a smiley on my post only when I'm smiling while postinig it. I don't smile that often.
Your Honour wrote:
> F### off to another thread you.
>
> You're both as patehtic as each other.
Please don't laden us with your unwanted opinions. I doubt if you even know what we're talking about.
> F### off to another thread you.
>
> You're both as patehtic as each other.
Please don't laden us with your unwanted opinions. I doubt if you even know what we're talking about.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Jimmy Duck wrote:
> How is it that cheques take five days to clear?
>
> With most banks they take 3 working days, of course, over a weekend
> this can be extended to 5 days, but it's still 3 working days. Why?
> Probably because of backlog of work and the fact that with inter-bank
> chequing, there is obviously a security and communication element
> involved.
>
> IB
Thanks, but i would have thought that with all todays fancy up to date gimozs and jobbins they could clear with in the hour. Damn you barclays.
> Jimmy Duck wrote:
> How is it that cheques take five days to clear?
>
> With most banks they take 3 working days, of course, over a weekend
> this can be extended to 5 days, but it's still 3 working days. Why?
> Probably because of backlog of work and the fact that with inter-bank
> chequing, there is obviously a security and communication element
> involved.
>
> IB
Thanks, but i would have thought that with all todays fancy up to date gimozs and jobbins they could clear with in the hour. Damn you barclays.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Little Hobbo wrote:
> Oh the joys of sarcasm.
>
> Oh the joys of wathcing you run out of "argumentative"
> steam. Go back to being the ordinary board poster you are now.
> kthxbye.
If thats what you mistake my light-hearted approach to being then so be it.
I was merely responding to your post in a non-threatening manner. Shame on you for not realising that. Lighten up a bit, but continue arguing. Everyone benefits. Even if its just by adding a little smiley face on the end of your post to show that we know you are human. :)
> Little Hobbo wrote:
> Oh the joys of sarcasm.
>
> Oh the joys of wathcing you run out of "argumentative"
> steam. Go back to being the ordinary board poster you are now.
> kthxbye.
If thats what you mistake my light-hearted approach to being then so be it.
I was merely responding to your post in a non-threatening manner. Shame on you for not realising that. Lighten up a bit, but continue arguing. Everyone benefits. Even if its just by adding a little smiley face on the end of your post to show that we know you are human. :)
Stryke wrote:
> You're enjoying this, aren't you YH? heh.
Enjoying what? I don't know what you mean.
> You're enjoying this, aren't you YH? heh.
Enjoying what? I don't know what you mean.
Here's who i'm considering voting for:
Edgy
===SONIC RAV--->
Dringo
At the moment, i'd say it's between Sonic and Edgy in terms of the number of decent posts and topics started recently in multi-forums.
I'll say Edgy for now, as he seems to be on the forums slightly more.
Edgy
===SONIC RAV--->
Dringo
At the moment, i'd say it's between Sonic and Edgy in terms of the number of decent posts and topics started recently in multi-forums.
I'll say Edgy for now, as he seems to be on the forums slightly more.
Stryke wrote:
> Heh, Silent85 and savattsomenumber just voted for each other. Tut tut.
It's all getting very Eurovision. I haven't voted yet, any offers?
> Heh, Silent85 and savattsomenumber just voted for each other. Tut tut.
It's all getting very Eurovision. I haven't voted yet, any offers?
i dont know who to vote for?????????????
I'l respect you/it/something when I see that it warrants the praise...hopefuly, moving it up into the "respect" catagory. Not doing much so far though...
Page: