Viewing Thread:
"Notable voting chat thread. Official. Because I said so."

I only set this up so that people DON'Y CHAT IN THE VOTING THREAD!

Also, we seem to get about a million of these on elecetion day, which is pointless, so try and keep it all in here. Cheers.

Chat about the election in here, who's going to win? Who doesn't deserve any votes? Who deserves more votes.

Insane Bartender wrote:

> I had given up hope for you until that last sentence.

(thanks for quoting every damn word I said).

But anyway IB, that's not the point, the point is, you are both not acting like primary school kids, you're acting like narky old men (and women). Are you too afraid to stop the petty arguments?

So, where on earth are the votes for Edgy? What's going on?

Sonic

You're enjoying this, aren't you YH? heh.

So what do people preferr toasters or lunch boxes?

Start voting.......................now!

Undead wrote:
> Please, please, children (Little Hobbo + Insane Bartender), isn't the
> fact that you can't let it drop showing that your'e not satisfied that
> "you're winning the argument", also known as, dragging an
> argument on which isn't a good one...I mean, for god sakes, you
> haven't even started insulting each others family. If you put the
> handbags away, and get down to the REAL good arguing, then you can
> carry on without any displeasure from anyone else.


Nah, I'm arguing because I am very bored, and I have an issue with the way IB argues. A bit like Tommy Boyd on Talksport; avoiding the subject matter so as to gain victory through some small mistake that the other person has made. Only I haven't made any any mistakes yet. :)

That last count is as 11:02, by the way.

Stryke wrote:
> I love you too. Yeah..
>
> Who's winning, anyway? Can the notables vote for monkey_man and get it
> over with yet


Before this I never really noticed monkey man on the forums! IS he the guy who made "navigation for monkeys"? If so, then he deserves some votes!

Undead wrote:
> Please, please, children (Little Hobbo + Insane Bartender), isn't the
> fact that you can't let it drop showing that your'e not satisfied that
> "you're winning the argument", also known as, dragging an
> argument on which isn't a good one...I mean, for god sakes, you
> haven't even started insulting each others family. If you put the
> handbags away, and get down to the REAL good arguing, then you can
> carry on without any displeasure from anyone else.
>
> (or just ignore me, because I talk crap)

I had given up hope for you until that last sentence.

Current voting (as of 10:43) as is as follows (God knows why I'm doing this):

Monkey_man 4
Mojojojo 2
Venombyte 1
Cooky 1
RM18 2
Mystique 1
Pro Evo 2
Stryke 1
Dognsuts 1
Craw 1


Monkey_man has an early lead, but some big names with no or few votes, a couple of challengers are starting to appear though.

Pro Evo jumps in with 2 votes, are the Sony forum showing their hand?
Still early days though, with a possible 80+ votes still to come in.

Remeber, all the notables are worth 24 votes together

Little Hobbo wrote:
> Quoting someones stupidity against them maybe, i agree. But my
> statement was of underlying accuracy, so stupidity does not enter the
> equation.

OK. How many primary school rejects do you know of, and of those, how many have ever said: "I would expect a comment like that from a primary school reject".

Not many, if any at all, so why would you expect it of them?

I hope you see why it was a stupid comment.