Viewing Thread:
"Notable voting chat thread. Official. Because I said so."

I only set this up so that people DON'Y CHAT IN THE VOTING THREAD!

Also, we seem to get about a million of these on elecetion day, which is pointless, so try and keep it all in here. Cheers.

Chat about the election in here, who's going to win? Who doesn't deserve any votes? Who deserves more votes.

Your Honour wrote:
> I think they're actually the same person, if you like at the timing of
> their posts.
>
> If you look at the syntax of the arguments they both use, the writing
> style, the type of insults. Gentlemen, the evidence is irrefutable.

err, wrong.

Your Honour wrote:
> I think they're actually the same person, if you like at the timing of
> their posts.
>
> If you look at the syntax of the arguments they both use, the writing
> style, the type of insults. Gentlemen, the evidence is irrefutable.

Damn, Foiled!!

I think they're actually the same person, if you like at the timing of their posts.

If you look at the syntax of the arguments they both use, the writing style, the type of insults. Gentlemen, the evidence is irrefutable.

Stryke wrote:
> Oh for Christs sake. Drop it, Hobbo person. You win, or whatever. IB,
> you also win. Huzzah, all over with.

It's not about winning, it's the taking part that matters!!!

Oh for Christs sake. Drop it, Hobbo person. You win, or whatever. IB, you also win. Huzzah, all over with.

Little Hobbo wrote:
> I seem to remember not long ago a similar argument, but in which IB
> was fighting you instead of me. Pot calling the kettle black you
> fudge. Read the posts and attack the one in the wrong, not both.

PRICELESS!!

Goatboy wrote:
> Jesus christ will the both of you just act like adults instead of
> waving your willys around trying to impress each other.
>

I seem to remember not long ago a similar argument, but in which IB was fighting you instead of me. Pot calling the kettle black you fudge. Read the posts and attack the one in the wrong, not both.

WòókieeMøn§†€® wrote:
> Mine does though, doesn't it?

Of course wookie.
*pats wookie on the head in a patronising fashion*

Insane Bartender wrote:

>
> On the contrary, people spam because they are too lazy to think up
> decent posts.

But you know I'm not spamming as I am arguing with you. If that is spamming then so is every other reply on this site. Yet you still bring it up. Why??

>
> Fantastic, a quality post that really skips around the issue without
> actually touching on it. If you read my last post properly you'll
> notice I said "OK, this may not be a huge issue, but your
> attitude towards it is whats the problem."
>
> My attitude towards the fact that you seem intent that I should adopt
> your use of smileys you mean? Don't be so pathetically arrogant. You
> like smileys, so use them. I don't, so I won't. DOn't think that by
> listlessly complaining at me that I'll change my views.

Look, I make this post in hope-springing-eternal of a sensible reply. Read my post again. CAREFULLY. You will notice that I am pointing out your despicable attitude to a good thing(smileys in this case), not your acceptance of smileys. I used smileys as a simple way to portray your attitude. For gods sake just read it properly will you.

>
> Right. I'm not making out that smileys are the be-all and end-all,
> I'm saying that your refusal to do them tells a lot about you as a
> person. Putting the focus on your 'attitude'.
>
> No, it says that you are incredibly obsessed with something that I see
> as irrelevant and insignificant. You come across as pushy and
> arrogant, with a plain ignorance of anyone else's view. Whereas that
> might be acceptable under certain circumstances, it sure isn't here.
> Grow up.

*Yawn* Once again you have somehow generated the idea that I am obsessed with smileys. Wrong, it's your attitude......look, how many times do I have to write this?
And all I am doing is trying to do is make the forum more friendly, not force people into points of view. Even if I did it's like saying 'don't walk on the grass'. It's a point of view, but its for the good of the grass.
Do you finally see?



>
> Had you read the post properly before brimming over with righteous
> indignation and tapping out a patronizing, controversial response,
> you
> might have actually got the point. Oh well, one can but
> hope.........
>
> I get it all too well. You want me to be like you. I won't. Ever.
> Thankfully.

You don't get it, what a pity.
>
> Me neither, I was just asking you NOT to reply til you've lightened
> your attitude a bit. And.....yes....I do believe.........Yes indeed
> there is a little face at the end of your post. Its not exactly
> smiling, but you'll get there eventually. Well done!! |-D
>
> Yes, you noticed my little bit of humour, and as promised it came with
> one of those rare faces you idolise so irrationally(YOU SEEM OBSESSED WITH IDEA DONT YOU). Don't expect any
> more to be forthcoming without good reason.

I am so sickened by your digusting attitude that is so arrogant, self-proclaimingly almighty, pathetic, absolutely 'NEVER WRONG', and see-through that I will maturely call a halt to this argument.

Whether you decide that I have 'run out of steam' or 'wimped out' then that is up to you. But I offer my hand to you, one of the younger generation, as a truce. We are clearly going to get nowhere, and especially not as I am going out now.
What is your manly response? A firm handshake, or a petty reply?

The System Works. :-)

I want to see if my notable vote predictions were correct.