Viewing Thread:
"Notable voting chat thread. Official. Because I said so."

I only set this up so that people DON'Y CHAT IN THE VOTING THREAD!

Also, we seem to get about a million of these on elecetion day, which is pointless, so try and keep it all in here. Cheers.

Chat about the election in here, who's going to win? Who doesn't deserve any votes? Who deserves more votes.

Goatboy wrote:
> You are the better man by leaving it, just as I was.

You should never have started it Goatboy. As I recall, YOU jumped at me for no reason whatsoever. You couldn't handle me coming back at you constantly, and so you quit it.

You thought you could "flame the newbie", but i proved to be more than you could chew. Live with it. You come across as bitter for losing to me. Hobbo did pretty much the same thing, only worse. Now that one is gone too.

The moral of the story: don't bother flaming me.

I'm here on these forums, and I post my opinions on things, game related or not. I'm perfectly happy to consider other points of view so long as they have some evidence to back it up. And if I argue against what you think, does the phrase "fight for what you believe in" mean anything? Don't shoot the messenger Goatboy. I say blue is better when you prefer red, you don't call me names for it, you give me reasons why red is better.

You're more the troll in my eyes. But you only come out with that attitude one day in ever 10 or so, which is why I don't greatly disrespect you fot it.

On with my day.

Goatboy wrote:

> So...Attack of The Clones eh? Better than Phantom Menace.

--

Damn straight. Stormtroopers, there were. Be happy.

woo hoo! I can access the topic again!

Was this argument really about the use of smileys?

*snigger*

Prove me wrong, I can't be bothered top read the whole thing. Stuff to do, you see.

Insane Bartender wrote:
> Little Hobbo wrote:
> Damn, Foiled!!
>
> hmm, you replied with only two words as well....
>
> Are you me...?
>
> *prods Little Hobbo*



Byeeeeeeeeeeee!!

IB will hold the fort til I'm back.

Little Hobbo wrote:
I seem to remember not long ago a similar argument, but in which IB
> was fighting you instead of me. Pot calling the kettle black you
> fudge. Read the posts and attack the one in the wrong, not both.

---

I'm a hypocrite.
But a Notable one.
Therefore a better one,and can reverse my opinions and views on a whim whilst automatically remaining above criticism.
It's in the rules.

Look, the purpose of a troll is cause long winded and extended pointless flaming.
He wins if you reply, I got sucked into that game before I realised, hence my bored replies to him since then.
I did exactly what you did, walked away once I realised that you cannot respond/argue/reply to a person that absolutely refuses to even consider opposing viewpoints.
It's not arrogance, it's stupidity.
There are a million trolls on a million websites, this one is no different to the others - despite what it claims.

You won by walking away, and I promise - absolutely 100% guarantee that he will always, always respond with a pithy comment.
It's what a troll does.
You are the better man by leaving it, just as I was.

So...Attack of The Clones eh? Better than Phantom Menace.

Meh, probably. Doesn't really matter though, does it? It's pathetic.

Insane Bartender wrote:
> Stryke wrote:
> Oh for Christs sake. Drop it, Hobbo person. You win, or whatever.
> IB,
> you also win. Huzzah, all over with.
>
> It's not about winning, it's the taking part that matters!!!

Indeed, and I have a great time and passed a great period of boredom.

Thankyou sincerely IB. I really have to go now so I'll see you guys for round 2 tomorrow. Tune in at the same time etc.

Insane Bartender wrote:
> err, wrong.


Damn.

You see, I wasn't being serious. Perhaps if I'd have used a smiley...

Little Hobbo wrote:
> Damn, Foiled!!

hmm, you replied with only two words as well....

Are you me...?

*prods Little Hobbo*