The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'StarFox 64'.
I am so dying for this game but I have heard some disappointing reports from sources like digitiser and other places too. Apparently as well as being a top class game it is like REALLY short and can be completed in a week quite easily.
ARGH!
I hope this is not true, I was dubbing this along with Mario as one of the best games I have ever played! Please let it be a massive adventure and that people have been telling Porkies!
Ah well, all we can do is sit back and wait I guess.
Have you guys heard anything like this about the game brimming with potential?
Cheers,
Time_Warp
ARGH!
I hope this is not true, I was dubbing this along with Mario as one of the best games I have ever played! Please let it be a massive adventure and that people have been telling Porkies!
Ah well, all we can do is sit back and wait I guess.
Have you guys heard anything like this about the game brimming with potential?
Cheers,
Time_Warp
Page:
They said Final Fantasy X took 40 hours to complete.
not really short if it is 30 hours and no replay value is well, predictable
Very few Adventure games like this have any replay value, I know I certainly never went back to Zelda so it's no bad thing.
Even if it does take about 30 Hrs to complete, is that really that short?
Even if it does take about 30 Hrs to complete, is that really that short?
Well... it's not on two disks, and it probably doesn't really last 80 hours - but that doesn't make it short. I think most US reviews have said that it's a long adventure, but with little replay value.
won't it take 80 hours to complete and it will be on 2 disks.
*I don't know*
*I don't know*
Why are we moaning about this crap! No-one here has got first hand infomation (done it themselves) so lets wait and see.
Page: