Viewing Thread:
"NGC Issue 74"

Goddamn my postie for practically tearing the thing in half to get it through. :)

Reviews:
Starfox Adventures - 72%!!!
Godzilla - 68%
Eternal Darkness - 89%
Pro Rally - 58%
Ace Golf - 74% (That's right - Ace Golf is better than SFA!)
Pro Tennis WTA Tour - 48%
Sega Soccer Slam - 67%
Rocky - 78%
Die Hard Vendetta - 80%
Doshin The Giant - 62%
Need for Speed 2 - 69%
Worms Blast - 63%
Freekstyle - 52%
NHL Hitz 20-03 - 65%

And ALL of those reviews of UK pal ones! Impressive, even if the scores weren't. :/

Oh yeah about the mag bit..diffrent mag sorry.

*bangs head on desk*
idiot boz they all hate you now.
they hated you anyway
they didnt know me
well now they will know as "idoit of the week" along with other rude words.
oh shut up
no you shut up...

Boz wrote:
> I find that NGC hardly ever says anything good about nintendo.

Ummm do you have trouble with long words or are you just reading a totally different magazine to me?

Boz wrote:
> I find that NGC hardly ever says anything good about nintendo.

*

Pardon?! They never stop going on about how marvellous etc etc Nintendo are!

I find that NGC hardly ever says anything good about nintendo.

Im not acting like nintendo is best becuase im sure they can say something which they are better at, its when all the consoles are bad t something and they moan at the GC and not the others, but i suppose if they multi format they would


im never buying another ngc mag ever, unless a dvd is free..then we will see.

Dark Mark wrote:
> GnomeKiller wrote:
> The review said they completed it in 15 hours, it may sound like
> nit-picking, but that is 50% less than you thought.
>
> *
>
> Actually, it's 15% more than everyone has in here has been saying. I
> was going on what they were saying and, as I said, I've not played the
> game yet.

*

50%, damnit!!

GnomeKiller wrote:
> The review said they completed it in 15 hours, it may sound like
> nit-picking, but that is 50% less than you thought.

*

Actually, it's 15% more than everyone has in here has been saying. I was going on what they were saying and, as I said, I've not played the game yet.

Dark Mark wrote:
> Don't forget that the NGC team being able to finish Starfox Adventures
> in 30 hours isn't THAT big a deal and certainly not something to get
> worked up about. Remember that these people play games for a living,
> so they're naturally going to be more skilled than most other people;
> completing games quicker. So for me, a game that NGC magazine staff
> could complete in 30 hours would probably last at least 60 and maybe
> even 70 hours.

The review said they completed it in 15 hours, it may sound like nit-picking, but that is 50% less than you thought.

I thought they're review of Starfox sounded fair. I mean they didn't say one good thing about the game the whole way through the article and still gave it 72, by the time I'd finished I thought they'd probably given it a much lower score. I was going to buy it, but I think I'll rent it and see where it goes from there.

morbo wrote:
> who cares what they put as a rating, they have put stupid ratings on
> other really good games.

*

Only other one I can think of is Turok Evolution. And I haven't even played Starfox Adventures yet, which is why I'm not in the position to comment on it directly.

who cares what they put as a rating, they have put stupid ratings on other really good games.