Viewing Thread:
"NGC has lost it."

I got NGC editon 74 yesterday and after reading their review of SFA I am outraged by it, I have totally begun to distrust every single Review that they will be posting in the future after I read this certain review. They always try to find something to go on about the game in a non likeable perspective, like it's tedious and it's not really original.
I never really like them since they changed to their big version of the magazine. Also what I find hard to beleive is that they completed the game in 15 hours, that and Eternal Darkness (well it might be possible for ED).

I really hope that they can redeem themselves from this, because the rest of the magazine is good but not the best. I find CUBE to be the best so far, NOM is good because of their walkthroughs and tips section, G-force because of it's free DVD with every issue (hopefully it will have a DVD with Starfox video clips on it).

Any magazine that gives Medal Of Honour 98% should be burned.

exactly what i mean
Wipeout fushion got 91%
ill go find it and quote some more

Eternal Darkness got a reasonable 90%, I think so to.
I don't think that saying in every review that they completed the games in 15 hours, it's so repetive for them to say that for every game.

They've played it, you haven't.

Who's in the better position to judge?

maddmun wrote:
> agt least most of their reviews are honest. My brothers Ps2 magazines
> rate 90 percent of games above, well, 90%. Medal Of Honour gets 98% as
> well as other games but the highest ever in NGC is 97% and thats only
> been given once i think.

In the 'N64' incarnation, the highest score was 98%, awarded to Zelda: OOT.

Zelda = 98%
MOH = 98%

Let me see...............hmmmmmm.........somethings wrong here.........

Definately.

When my brother got MOH I admit I as pleasently surprised.

the first level was fun, the weapons felt nice, there was some nice variation where your the gunner on a truck and stuff.

But there was still mucho crapness bits in it.

I would give it about 86%

Absolute krubbish compared to the PC version though. Simply because you can spend around 30 seconds trying to hit someone with a bullet from a machine gun.

I was talking about the PC version.

Cyclone wrote:
> Zelda = 98%
> MOH = 98%
>
> Let me see...............hmmmmmm.........somethings wrong
> here.........

Zelda 97% shows how overexagerative PS2 mags are, giving MOH 98%