The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
1. We might consider booting the odd Notable off the Notable list. But I'm not sure if it would be by democratic vote, as that would be very catty. A bit like Big Brother.
2. We might consider an interim status between the current range and banned. I favour "learner" for the status tag and pink for the name colour to warn of danger. We could call them "pinkies".
Changes would appear to be necessary to improve the written content.
2. We might consider an interim status between the current range and banned. I favour "learner" for the status tag and pink for the name colour to warn of danger. We could call them "pinkies".
Changes would appear to be necessary to improve the written content.
Page:
Bam! Why not? Gives more enjoyable reading to the post when you read it no doubt.
Unbeliever wrote:
> Kyz22 wrote:
>
> Very very much so. You've made my day.
>
>
> Heh heh! :P
Sarcasm is a powerful tool that I have been able to use to its maximum potential.
> Kyz22 wrote:
>
> Very very much so. You've made my day.
>
>
> Heh heh! :P
Sarcasm is a powerful tool that I have been able to use to its maximum potential.
er-no wrote:
> Bam!
>
> Pinkies will return.
>
> Bam!
>
> It is all so good.
>
> Bam!
>
> I knew that topic would work.
Why the "Bam's" ?
> Bam!
>
> Pinkies will return.
>
> Bam!
>
> It is all so good.
>
> Bam!
>
> I knew that topic would work.
Why the "Bam's" ?
Kyz22 wrote:
> Very very much so. You've made my day.
Heh heh! :P
> Very very much so. You've made my day.
Heh heh! :P
Bam!
Pinkies will return.
Bam!
It is all so good.
Bam!
I knew that topic would work.
Pinkies will return.
Bam!
It is all so good.
Bam!
I knew that topic would work.
Unbeliever wrote:
> Kyz22 wrote:
> Unbeliever wrote:
> I think that there should be a status of "idiot of the
> day"
> for certain people who irritate the hell out of everyone else for
> posting meaningless rubbish.#
>
> Like you?
>
> Especially me!
>
> *rips "idiot of the day" status off Doughnut Monster's head
> and firmly affixes it to brow*
>
> Happy now?
Much better
> Kyz22 wrote:
> Unbeliever wrote:
> I think that there should be a status of "idiot of the
> day"
> for certain people who irritate the hell out of everyone else for
> posting meaningless rubbish.#
>
> Like you?
>
> Especially me!
>
> *rips "idiot of the day" status off Doughnut Monster's head
> and firmly affixes it to brow*
>
> Happy now?
Much better
Unbeliever wrote:
> Kyz22 wrote:
> Unbeliever wrote:
> I think that there should be a status of "idiot of the
> day"
> for certain people who irritate the hell out of everyone else for
> posting meaningless rubbish.#
>
> Like you?
>
> Especially me!
>
> *rips "idiot of the day" status off Doughnut Monster's head
> and firmly affixes it to brow*
>
> Happy now?
Very very much so. You've made my day.
> Kyz22 wrote:
> Unbeliever wrote:
> I think that there should be a status of "idiot of the
> day"
> for certain people who irritate the hell out of everyone else for
> posting meaningless rubbish.#
>
> Like you?
>
> Especially me!
>
> *rips "idiot of the day" status off Doughnut Monster's head
> and firmly affixes it to brow*
>
> Happy now?
Very very much so. You've made my day.
Kyz22 wrote:
> Unbeliever wrote:
> I think that there should be a status of "idiot of the
> day"
> for certain people who irritate the hell out of everyone else for
> posting meaningless rubbish.#
>
> Like you?
Especially me!
*rips "idiot of the day" status off Doughnut Monster's head and firmly affixes it to brow*
Happy now?
> Unbeliever wrote:
> I think that there should be a status of "idiot of the
> day"
> for certain people who irritate the hell out of everyone else for
> posting meaningless rubbish.#
>
> Like you?
Especially me!
*rips "idiot of the day" status off Doughnut Monster's head and firmly affixes it to brow*
Happy now?
Very nice indeed, although, does this mean that there will be no more Notable elections then?
Why not call Pinkies 'Retards'?
It's so blunt and sueable, it just might work.
It's so blunt and sueable, it just might work.
Page: