The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
star wars or star treck?
Page:
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> Star Trek's for pasty faced mongs.
>
> Star Wars had lightsabers, Darth Vader and Natalie Portman
>
> Gee I can't think which is better.
Star Trek has equals, Phasers, The Borg Queen and Seven Of Nine!!!
> Star Trek's for pasty faced mongs.
>
> Star Wars had lightsabers, Darth Vader and Natalie Portman
>
> Gee I can't think which is better.
Star Trek has equals, Phasers, The Borg Queen and Seven Of Nine!!!
They are both simple sci-fi programmes. You should watch ZOO TV.
Belldandy wrote:
> Skarra wrote:
> >You should follow my
> example!!!
>
> Please, anybody, if I start acting like Skarra then someone shoot me
> or something.
>
> Anyways, Star Trek is, and always will be, boring, and just because
> people watch it it does not mean it is good, as the case of Pop Idol
> e.t.c. proves, I defy anyone to explain to me how Pop Idol -
> essentially one long advertisment campaign for a CD - was quality
> programming. It wasn't.
>
> The premise of Star Trek is good, but it never quite goes where it
> should.
>
> ~~Belldandy~~
In your opinion!!!!
> Skarra wrote:
> >You should follow my
> example!!!
>
> Please, anybody, if I start acting like Skarra then someone shoot me
> or something.
>
> Anyways, Star Trek is, and always will be, boring, and just because
> people watch it it does not mean it is good, as the case of Pop Idol
> e.t.c. proves, I defy anyone to explain to me how Pop Idol -
> essentially one long advertisment campaign for a CD - was quality
> programming. It wasn't.
>
> The premise of Star Trek is good, but it never quite goes where it
> should.
>
> ~~Belldandy~~
In your opinion!!!!
Mystique wrote:
> Grrrrrrrr
And this is why I'll continue doing it, who'd have thought a few characters could annoy so many ?
~~Belldandy~~
> Grrrrrrrr
And this is why I'll continue doing it, who'd have thought a few characters could annoy so many ?
~~Belldandy~~
cookie monster wrote:
> I think star trek is better.
>
> The next generation, voyager and enterprise are all very watchable.
I agree (of course)
Star Wars is good too, but it's just 6 films.
Star Trek has lots of long series so you can relly get into then, the only ones I've watched are Voyager, Next Generation, Enterprise and Deep Space Nine, all of which I could get into easily even though they were half way through, and were every enjoyable.
Of course I haven't mentioned the books here, my brother has a load of the Star Wars Rogue Squadron books that I am just starting to read through, I've never read a Star Trek book.
> I think star trek is better.
>
> The next generation, voyager and enterprise are all very watchable.
I agree (of course)
Star Wars is good too, but it's just 6 films.
Star Trek has lots of long series so you can relly get into then, the only ones I've watched are Voyager, Next Generation, Enterprise and Deep Space Nine, all of which I could get into easily even though they were half way through, and were every enjoyable.
Of course I haven't mentioned the books here, my brother has a load of the Star Wars Rogue Squadron books that I am just starting to read through, I've never read a Star Trek book.
Star Trek's for pasty faced mongs.
Star Wars had lightsabers, Darth Vader and Natalie Portman
Gee I can't think which is better.
Star Wars had lightsabers, Darth Vader and Natalie Portman
Gee I can't think which is better.
Belldandy wrote:
> ~~Belldandy~~
****
Grrrrrrrr
> ~~Belldandy~~
****
Grrrrrrrr
Star Trek all the way baby!
Compared to what ? Watching paint dry ? :P
~~Belldandy~~
~~Belldandy~~
I think star trek is better.
The next generation, voyager and enterprise are all very watchable.
The next generation, voyager and enterprise are all very watchable.
Page: