The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
star wars or star treck?
Page:
Belldandy wrote:
> Skarra wrote:
> I'm sure there are thousands of beings out there who have been on
> the
> recieving end of a phaser. I bet they would disagree with you!
>
> What with them all being fictional and that....:)
>
> ~~Belldandy~~
And lightsabers and Darth Vader are real are they???
> Skarra wrote:
> I'm sure there are thousands of beings out there who have been on
> the
> recieving end of a phaser. I bet they would disagree with you!
>
> What with them all being fictional and that....:)
>
> ~~Belldandy~~
And lightsabers and Darth Vader are real are they???
P@st@ Claus wrote:
> The wars, without a doubt.
>
> Why? Because the strong whiff of cheese that comes from the original
> star trek is becoming increasingly strong.
Then why do you think that all Star Trek is the same as old Kirk and Bones? It's not and the series' have got a more updated and realistic(ish) look to them than some stupid carboard-cut-out.
> The wars, without a doubt.
>
> Why? Because the strong whiff of cheese that comes from the original
> star trek is becoming increasingly strong.
Then why do you think that all Star Trek is the same as old Kirk and Bones? It's not and the series' have got a more updated and realistic(ish) look to them than some stupid carboard-cut-out.
P@st@ Claus wrote:
> The wars, without a doubt.
>
> Why? Because the strong whiff of cheese that comes from the original
> star trek is becoming increasingly strong.
Then why do you think that all Star Trek is the same as old Kirk and Bones? It's not and the series' have got a more updated and realistic(ish) look to them than some stupid carboard-cut-out.
> The wars, without a doubt.
>
> Why? Because the strong whiff of cheese that comes from the original
> star trek is becoming increasingly strong.
Then why do you think that all Star Trek is the same as old Kirk and Bones? It's not and the series' have got a more updated and realistic(ish) look to them than some stupid carboard-cut-out.
Skarra wrote:
> I'm sure there are thousands of beings out there who have been on the
> recieving end of a phaser. I bet they would disagree with you!
What with them all being fictional and that....:)
~~Belldandy~~
> I'm sure there are thousands of beings out there who have been on the
> recieving end of a phaser. I bet they would disagree with you!
What with them all being fictional and that....:)
~~Belldandy~~
The wars, without a doubt.
Why? Because the strong whiff of cheese that comes from the original star trek is becoming increasingly strong.
Why? Because the strong whiff of cheese that comes from the original star trek is becoming increasingly strong.
bono is god wrote:
> I know the ways of the Jedi, so Star Wars is obviously more realistic.
Be quiet!
> I know the ways of the Jedi, so Star Wars is obviously more realistic.
Be quiet!
Belldandy wrote:
> Skarra wrote:
> Star Trek has equals, Phasers, The Borg Queen and Seven Of Nine!!!
>
> Oh come on ! The phasers are pathetic little stabby light things, even
> the rifle versions. Lightsabers are cool, all powerful limb chopping
> weapons, that don't set for stun....
>
> ~~Belldandy~~
I'm sure there are thousands of beings out there who have been on the recieving end of a phaser. I bet they would disagree with you!
> Skarra wrote:
> Star Trek has equals, Phasers, The Borg Queen and Seven Of Nine!!!
>
> Oh come on ! The phasers are pathetic little stabby light things, even
> the rifle versions. Lightsabers are cool, all powerful limb chopping
> weapons, that don't set for stun....
>
> ~~Belldandy~~
I'm sure there are thousands of beings out there who have been on the recieving end of a phaser. I bet they would disagree with you!
Skarra wrote:
> Tiltawhirl wrote:
> Star Trek's for pasty faced mongs.
>
> Star Wars had lightsabers, Darth Vader and Natalie Portman
>
> Gee I can't think which is better.
>
> Star Trek has equals, Phasers, The Borg Queen and Seven Of Nine!!!
Yep Jeri Ryan with her hair down is quite a fox. Don't forget there are 10 films to go with that resume (6 of which are crap Original series ones).
> Tiltawhirl wrote:
> Star Trek's for pasty faced mongs.
>
> Star Wars had lightsabers, Darth Vader and Natalie Portman
>
> Gee I can't think which is better.
>
> Star Trek has equals, Phasers, The Borg Queen and Seven Of Nine!!!
Yep Jeri Ryan with her hair down is quite a fox. Don't forget there are 10 films to go with that resume (6 of which are crap Original series ones).
Skarra wrote:
> Star Trek has equals, Phasers, The Borg Queen and Seven Of Nine!!!
Oh come on ! The phasers are pathetic little stabby light things, even the rifle versions. Lightsabers are cool, all powerful limb chopping weapons, that don't set for stun....
~~Belldandy~~
> Star Trek has equals, Phasers, The Borg Queen and Seven Of Nine!!!
Oh come on ! The phasers are pathetic little stabby light things, even the rifle versions. Lightsabers are cool, all powerful limb chopping weapons, that don't set for stun....
~~Belldandy~~
bono is god wrote:
> They are both simple sci-fi programmes. You should watch ZOO TV.
Are you a regular on ZOO TV???
*lol*
> They are both simple sci-fi programmes. You should watch ZOO TV.
Are you a regular on ZOO TV???
*lol*
Page: