Viewing Thread:
"Star wars or star trek?"

star wars or star treck?

Star Trek was better, but now we have Cpt Archer and is looser grew, I'm not so sure!

Skarra wrote:

> First Contact, just a few more effects! Ha!!!
>
> Nemesis looks to have more kick *** battles than any Wars film so
> far!!

Granted, I haven't seen that one.

However I can never get away from the feeling thats its just an episode.

P@st@ Claus wrote:
> Skarra wrote:
>
> Granted, it did lose it a bit towards the end, but that was poor
> directing.
>
> Besides, if Star Trek was so pants, why have they got 10 films that
> were all at least a bit popular?
>
> I like the films, but not as much as the Wars films.
>
> Why? Because the Star Trek Films have always seemed to me to be just
> extra long TV episodes, with a few more effects.

First Contact, just a few more effects! Ha!!!

Nemesis looks to have more kick a$s battles than any Wars film so far!!

Skarra wrote:

> Granted, it did lose it a bit towards the end, but that was poor
> directing.
>
> Besides, if Star Trek was so pants, why have they got 10 films that
> were all at least a bit popular?

I like the films, but not as much as the Wars films.

Why? Because the Star Trek Films have always seemed to me to be just extra long TV episodes, with a few more effects.

P@st@ Claus wrote:
> Neo Elimin@tor 2015 wrote:
>
> Then why do you think that all Star Trek is the same as old Kirk and
> Bones? It's not and the series' have got a more updated and
> realistic(ish) look to them than some stupid carboard-cut-out.
>
> I actually like the new series, and all of the other more modern ones,
> Its just I think that they have been over used.
>
> By Voyger (the 'Newest trek', as enterprise is a prequel) things
> started to get a bit silly on the technology side, along with some bad
> acting.

Granted, it did lose it a bit towards the end, but that was poor directing.

Besides, if Star Trek was so pants, why have they got 10 films that were all at least a bit popular?

Can't you do a Waco, bono is god ?

~~Belldandy~~

Belldandy wrote:
> Skarra wrote:
> And lightsabers and Darth Vader are real are they???
>
> "Yes" :) All the star wars films start with "A Long
> Time Ago" don't they....
>
> *Please note I do not really think they are real - obvious to most of
> you but not to all*
>
> ~~Belldandy~~

"Yes" :) All the star wars films start with "A Long
Time Ago" don't they....
So what.

Fairy Tales start with Once Upon a Time, are they all true aswell???

Neo Elimin@tor 2015 wrote:

> Then why do you think that all Star Trek is the same as old Kirk and
> Bones? It's not and the series' have got a more updated and
> realistic(ish) look to them than some stupid carboard-cut-out.

I actually like the new series, and all of the other more modern ones, Its just I think that they have been over used.

By Voyger (the 'Newest trek', as enterprise is a prequel) things started to get a bit silly on the technology side, along with some bad acting.

Skarra wrote:
> And lightsabers and Darth Vader are real are they???

"Yes" :) All the star wars films start with "A Long Time Ago" don't they....

*Please note I do not really think they are real - obvious to most of you but not to all*

~~Belldandy~~

bono is god wrote:
> You are all a bunch of sad losers who don't have lives. Join me, Bono,
> and lets change uk chat forums into an interesting site which
> discusses interesting subjects.
>
> Thanks for your time, my friends.
>
> BONO IS GOD.

SHUTTTTTTT UPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

Frankly you are very lucky not to get banned