The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Why has the most anticipated game of the year recieved such a low score???
PS2 looks good. But PS3 is in the making so I will only get a year or 2 out of it. Not exactly great for £200
X-Box, standerd internet connection and hard drive. Looks good, but its massive.
GameCube, Sext litle thing. Wth loads of game coming out, but its gonna be the latest arrival of them all :o(
But, I need to play on an X-Box then a GameCube, to see which one really rules.
> i made this post a while ago and the reason is due to the very long cutscenes,
> some lasting up to 10 minutes apparantly, often going through same sections time
> and time again and also constant interference in the game and how it keeps
> stopping and starting. other than that the game is as good as expected. it's
> just being able to actually play the game instead of watching the game
That's OK, I don't mind them, it makes me feel more involved. I've got the longer (*ahem*, massive) demo and it's better than expected. It's also the first game on the PS2 to score a Perfect 10 with OPS2. Just as a matter of interest, what did Edge give it and what mag was this?
Pal version has option to turn cut-scenes off though dont it?
> Mwuah, because its crap.
It should be made on the GC, then it would be
> getting 90%+
The fuse was lit.......