The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Play magazine gave Metal Gear Solid 2 77%, now I don't normally make short topics but i would like a Playstation fan of some description to justify this????
Why has the most anticipated game of the year recieved such a low score???
Why has the most anticipated game of the year recieved such a low score???
Page:
Mattyboy wrote:
> I read in the Official PS2 mag that one cut scene towards the end lasts for 20
> minutes!!
oooo you should see the ******* scene oh my god its amazing!
that one is pushing 15min
> I read in the Official PS2 mag that one cut scene towards the end lasts for 20
> minutes!!
oooo you should see the ******* scene oh my god its amazing!
that one is pushing 15min
Dringo wrote:
> LAnguage :D
Cut scenes should be like those in Goldeneye!
What short? Quite unimpressive (graphically speaking)?
> LAnguage :D
Cut scenes should be like those in Goldeneye!
What short? Quite unimpressive (graphically speaking)?
LAnguage :D
Cut scenes should be like those in Goldeneye!
Cut scenes should be like those in Goldeneye!
Mattyboy wrote:
> I read in the Official PS2 mag that one cut scene towards the end lasts for 20
> minutes!!
20 minutes? jeez that's like the length of an episode of The Simpsons.
Cut scenes can be good, but i'm sorry 20 minutes takes the p**s.
> I read in the Official PS2 mag that one cut scene towards the end lasts for 20
> minutes!!
20 minutes? jeez that's like the length of an episode of The Simpsons.
Cut scenes can be good, but i'm sorry 20 minutes takes the p**s.
I dont read many PS2 mags i just read 77% and i heared otehrs say it was awful and i wondered why?
I read in the Official PS2 mag that one cut scene towards the end lasts for 20 minutes!!
Serious Dave wrote:
> i noticed her t-shirt aswell,odd
Wait, you people actually watch that show?
> i noticed her t-shirt aswell,odd
Wait, you people actually watch that show?
And I dont think the rating system is all that anyway. It is very vague to just do it out of ten.
They only give whole numbers dont they? no 9.5, 9.6...etc. Not the best way of rating a game IMO.
They only give whole numbers dont they? no 9.5, 9.6...etc. Not the best way of rating a game IMO.
How can a game get 10 for everything, so they reckon it was perfect do they?
I thought NOM was bad.
I thought NOM was bad.
Yeah but the official mag is very biased. I cant believe they wrote that there is nothing wrong with this game in the summary.
Page: