The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
i think that a really cool game would be one that had a control system like onimusha, graghics like the two towers, a story like medal of honor, set in medieval times, have continuous play (no missions/levels), and have epic battles like dynasty warriors (without magic, stupid controls, or over the top animations) and be as historically accurate and realistic as the moh seris!!!!
Do you agree?
- Why does no company try to make somthing origional like this?
Do you agree?
- Why does no company try to make somthing origional like this?
Page:
Zhuge Liang wrote:
>
> The game i am describing is nothing like final fantasy, thats turn
> based versus 3 guys max or as i like to call it, crap. This would be
> fighting 1000's of people in battles like in braveheart or gladiator,
> with no bloody magic!!!!
um, i think that is called a stratgy game like cossacks. you control an army and you play as people in history and fight famous battles.
>
> The game i am describing is nothing like final fantasy, thats turn
> based versus 3 guys max or as i like to call it, crap. This would be
> fighting 1000's of people in battles like in braveheart or gladiator,
> with no bloody magic!!!!
um, i think that is called a stratgy game like cossacks. you control an army and you play as people in history and fight famous battles.
morbo wrote:
> Zhuge Liang wrote:
> i think that a really cool game would be one that had a control
> system
> like onimusha, graghics like the two towers, a story like medal of
> honor, set in medieval times, have continuous play (no
> missions/levels), and have epic battles like dynasty warriors
> (without
> magic, stupid controls, or over the top animations) and be as
> historically accurate and realistic as the moh seris!!!!
>
> Do you agree?
> - Why does no company try to make somthing origional like this?
>
> so your discribing the final fantasy series. it has great grafics,
> nice control system, continuous play, some are set in medievil times
> while some are futuristic/si-fi, and some are set in this kind of age.
> its not historicaly accurate as that would be dull, and predicable.
The game i am describing is nothing like final fantasy, thats turn based versus 3 guys max or as i like to call it, crap. This would be fighting 1000's of people in battles like in braveheart or gladiator, with no bloody magic!!!!
> Zhuge Liang wrote:
> i think that a really cool game would be one that had a control
> system
> like onimusha, graghics like the two towers, a story like medal of
> honor, set in medieval times, have continuous play (no
> missions/levels), and have epic battles like dynasty warriors
> (without
> magic, stupid controls, or over the top animations) and be as
> historically accurate and realistic as the moh seris!!!!
>
> Do you agree?
> - Why does no company try to make somthing origional like this?
>
> so your discribing the final fantasy series. it has great grafics,
> nice control system, continuous play, some are set in medievil times
> while some are futuristic/si-fi, and some are set in this kind of age.
> its not historicaly accurate as that would be dull, and predicable.
The game i am describing is nothing like final fantasy, thats turn based versus 3 guys max or as i like to call it, crap. This would be fighting 1000's of people in battles like in braveheart or gladiator, with no bloody magic!!!!
Zhuge Liang wrote:
> i think that a really cool game would be one that had a control system
> like onimusha, graghics like the two towers, a story like medal of
> honor, set in medieval times, have continuous play (no
> missions/levels), and have epic battles like dynasty warriors (without
> magic, stupid controls, or over the top animations) and be as
> historically accurate and realistic as the moh seris!!!!
>
> Do you agree?
> - Why does no company try to make somthing origional like this?
so your discribing the final fantasy series. it has great grafics, nice control system, continuous play, some are set in medievil times while some are futuristic/si-fi, and some are set in this kind of age. its not historicaly accurate as that would be dull, and predicable.
> i think that a really cool game would be one that had a control system
> like onimusha, graghics like the two towers, a story like medal of
> honor, set in medieval times, have continuous play (no
> missions/levels), and have epic battles like dynasty warriors (without
> magic, stupid controls, or over the top animations) and be as
> historically accurate and realistic as the moh seris!!!!
>
> Do you agree?
> - Why does no company try to make somthing origional like this?
so your discribing the final fantasy series. it has great grafics, nice control system, continuous play, some are set in medievil times while some are futuristic/si-fi, and some are set in this kind of age. its not historicaly accurate as that would be dull, and predicable.
gta games are so old, vice city really annoyed me when i got it, if the make this idea next time, i would buy it.
what other ideas are better than this, i mean its just the best idea of all time and space.
i think that a really cool game would be one that had a control system like onimusha, graghics like the two towers, a story like medal of honor, set in medieval times, have continuous play (no missions/levels), and have epic battles like dynasty warriors (without magic, stupid controls, or over the top animations) and be as historically accurate and realistic as the moh seris!!!!
Do you agree?
- Why does no company try to make somthing origional like this?
Do you agree?
- Why does no company try to make somthing origional like this?
Page: