The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I'm not usually one to rub things in peoples faces.
In fact, I hate doing it.
But I could let this oppurtunity pass.
Top Score - A Nintendo franchise outsold the unbeatable Vice City
Yes, flame me all you will, but I'm retardant... Flame Retardant...
In fact, I hate doing it.
But I could let this oppurtunity pass.
Top Score - A Nintendo franchise outsold the unbeatable Vice City
Yes, flame me all you will, but I'm retardant... Flame Retardant...
Page:
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Updated wrote:
> Well, I C IB is getting wound up again. To be honest, I can't see
> why
> this guy appears to have a problem. If he doesn't like TS, then IB
> doesnt have to respond. And if all of this forum upsets him, well he
> knows what he can do. The tag line under his name "An eastern
> inbred" is also suspect - a little dig at the eastern countries
> by any chance? Hope not.
>
> 1) I'm not upset. The only thing I'm getting irritated about is you
> being completely incapable of sticking to an individual subject
> without diverging in order to find a strong point that you can pump in
> people's faces.
>
> 2) re-arrange the letters of my name, and see what you can come up
> with. And I swear by Christ the next poerson to unjustly infer that I
> am a racist will be dead by dawn.
>
>
>
> Anyway, didn't I say that Zelda was doing well, but had doubts about
> how long it could keep going at that rate. Fair point I thought.
> What
> TS said months or weeks ago doesn't effect me or what I have just
> said
> (although it appears to effect IB).
>
> What you're saying isn't the subject in hand, as I've pointed to
> previously, you're completely incapable of holding up an argument
> without changing it to be something that you can defend. The subject
> here is the record breaking pre-sales of Zelda, how it will perform
> from here on in is not only impossible to gauge, but also completely
> irrelevant to what is being talked about here.
>
>
> So what if Nintendo do produce a "popular" game which
> sells
> quicker or more than GTA-VC. I could argue, that it's (along with
> the
> £99 GC price tag) too little to late. But I won't go that far
> (although TS might, but thats not down to me), yet. I also remember
> saying (a very long time ago) that GC might not fail, but continue
> in
> a similar way to the N64.
>
> I'm going to completely dismiss this entire paragraph because it is,
> AGAIN, moving away from the subject at hand because you can't find
> anything to combat the original point.
>
> Grow up.
Totally unjust response yet AGAIN! What you write on the screen (name, tag line, posts, etc) is your responsibility. Even if someone else thinks it up - if it's submitted by you - then it's still your responsibility. Think before you type. If you don't want other people to make obvious conclusions about your text - then don't write it in the first place. Don't threaten me for reading your text (very peed off at this moment).
> Updated wrote:
> Well, I C IB is getting wound up again. To be honest, I can't see
> why
> this guy appears to have a problem. If he doesn't like TS, then IB
> doesnt have to respond. And if all of this forum upsets him, well he
> knows what he can do. The tag line under his name "An eastern
> inbred" is also suspect - a little dig at the eastern countries
> by any chance? Hope not.
>
> 1) I'm not upset. The only thing I'm getting irritated about is you
> being completely incapable of sticking to an individual subject
> without diverging in order to find a strong point that you can pump in
> people's faces.
>
> 2) re-arrange the letters of my name, and see what you can come up
> with. And I swear by Christ the next poerson to unjustly infer that I
> am a racist will be dead by dawn.
>
>
>
> Anyway, didn't I say that Zelda was doing well, but had doubts about
> how long it could keep going at that rate. Fair point I thought.
> What
> TS said months or weeks ago doesn't effect me or what I have just
> said
> (although it appears to effect IB).
>
> What you're saying isn't the subject in hand, as I've pointed to
> previously, you're completely incapable of holding up an argument
> without changing it to be something that you can defend. The subject
> here is the record breaking pre-sales of Zelda, how it will perform
> from here on in is not only impossible to gauge, but also completely
> irrelevant to what is being talked about here.
>
>
> So what if Nintendo do produce a "popular" game which
> sells
> quicker or more than GTA-VC. I could argue, that it's (along with
> the
> £99 GC price tag) too little to late. But I won't go that far
> (although TS might, but thats not down to me), yet. I also remember
> saying (a very long time ago) that GC might not fail, but continue
> in
> a similar way to the N64.
>
> I'm going to completely dismiss this entire paragraph because it is,
> AGAIN, moving away from the subject at hand because you can't find
> anything to combat the original point.
>
> Grow up.
Totally unjust response yet AGAIN! What you write on the screen (name, tag line, posts, etc) is your responsibility. Even if someone else thinks it up - if it's submitted by you - then it's still your responsibility. Think before you type. If you don't want other people to make obvious conclusions about your text - then don't write it in the first place. Don't threaten me for reading your text (very peed off at this moment).
Insane Bartender wrote:
You mean "species" don't you?
------------
Well, it says here on the leaflet; "significantly unsignificant race".
Those damn communists must be at it again.
You mean "species" don't you?
------------
Well, it says here on the leaflet; "significantly unsignificant race".
Those damn communists must be at it again.
Virtuoso wrote:
> But you're always abusing us Scousers. We're a race unto ourselves you
> know...
>
> :P
You mean "species" don't you?
> But you're always abusing us Scousers. We're a race unto ourselves you
> know...
>
> :P
You mean "species" don't you?
Insane Bartender wrote:
Re-arrange the letters of my name, and see what you can come up with. And I swear by Christ the next poerson to unjustly infer that I am a racist will be dead by dawn.
-------------
But you're always abusing us Scousers. We're a race unto ourselves you know...
:P
Re-arrange the letters of my name, and see what you can come up with. And I swear by Christ the next poerson to unjustly infer that I am a racist will be dead by dawn.
-------------
But you're always abusing us Scousers. We're a race unto ourselves you know...
:P
Updated wrote:
The tag line under his name "An eastern
> inbred" is also suspect - a little dig at the eastern countries
> by any chance? Hope not.
Thats my fault. I gave him that Tag. Its an anagram.
www.wordsmith.org.
It funny how people can twist the smallest things to make people sound like 'ists
The tag line under his name "An eastern
> inbred" is also suspect - a little dig at the eastern countries
> by any chance? Hope not.
Thats my fault. I gave him that Tag. Its an anagram.
www.wordsmith.org.
It funny how people can twist the smallest things to make people sound like 'ists
Updated wrote:
> Well, I C IB is getting wound up again. To be honest, I can't see why
> this guy appears to have a problem. If he doesn't like TS, then IB
> doesnt have to respond. And if all of this forum upsets him, well he
> knows what he can do. The tag line under his name "An eastern
> inbred" is also suspect - a little dig at the eastern countries
> by any chance? Hope not.
1) I'm not upset. The only thing I'm getting irritated about is you being completely incapable of sticking to an individual subject without diverging in order to find a strong point that you can pump in people's faces.
2) re-arrange the letters of my name, and see what you can come up with. And I swear by Christ the next poerson to unjustly infer that I am a racist will be dead by dawn.
> Anyway, didn't I say that Zelda was doing well, but had doubts about
> how long it could keep going at that rate. Fair point I thought. What
> TS said months or weeks ago doesn't effect me or what I have just said
> (although it appears to effect IB).
What you're saying isn't the subject in hand, as I've pointed to previously, you're completely incapable of holding up an argument without changing it to be something that you can defend. The subject here is the record breaking pre-sales of Zelda, how it will perform from here on in is not only impossible to gauge, but also completely irrelevant to what is being talked about here.
> So what if Nintendo do produce a "popular" game which sells
> quicker or more than GTA-VC. I could argue, that it's (along with the
> £99 GC price tag) too little to late. But I won't go that far
> (although TS might, but thats not down to me), yet. I also remember
> saying (a very long time ago) that GC might not fail, but continue in
> a similar way to the N64.
I'm going to completely dismiss this entire paragraph because it is, AGAIN, moving away from the subject at hand because you can't find anything to combat the original point.
Grow up.
> Well, I C IB is getting wound up again. To be honest, I can't see why
> this guy appears to have a problem. If he doesn't like TS, then IB
> doesnt have to respond. And if all of this forum upsets him, well he
> knows what he can do. The tag line under his name "An eastern
> inbred" is also suspect - a little dig at the eastern countries
> by any chance? Hope not.
1) I'm not upset. The only thing I'm getting irritated about is you being completely incapable of sticking to an individual subject without diverging in order to find a strong point that you can pump in people's faces.
2) re-arrange the letters of my name, and see what you can come up with. And I swear by Christ the next poerson to unjustly infer that I am a racist will be dead by dawn.
> Anyway, didn't I say that Zelda was doing well, but had doubts about
> how long it could keep going at that rate. Fair point I thought. What
> TS said months or weeks ago doesn't effect me or what I have just said
> (although it appears to effect IB).
What you're saying isn't the subject in hand, as I've pointed to previously, you're completely incapable of holding up an argument without changing it to be something that you can defend. The subject here is the record breaking pre-sales of Zelda, how it will perform from here on in is not only impossible to gauge, but also completely irrelevant to what is being talked about here.
> So what if Nintendo do produce a "popular" game which sells
> quicker or more than GTA-VC. I could argue, that it's (along with the
> £99 GC price tag) too little to late. But I won't go that far
> (although TS might, but thats not down to me), yet. I also remember
> saying (a very long time ago) that GC might not fail, but continue in
> a similar way to the N64.
I'm going to completely dismiss this entire paragraph because it is, AGAIN, moving away from the subject at hand because you can't find anything to combat the original point.
Grow up.
Well, I C IB is getting wound up again. To be honest, I can't see why this guy appears to have a problem. If he doesn't like TS, then IB doesnt have to respond. And if all of this forum upsets him, well he knows what he can do. The tag line under his name "An eastern inbred" is also suspect - a little dig at the eastern countries by any chance? Hope not.
Anyway, didn't I say that Zelda was doing well, but had doubts about how long it could keep going at that rate. Fair point I thought. What TS said months or weeks ago doesn't effect me or what I have just said (although it appears to effect IB).
So what if Nintendo do produce a "popular" game which sells quicker or more than GTA-VC. I could argue, that it's (along with the £99 GC price tag) too little to late. But I won't go that far (although TS might, but thats not down to me), yet. I also remember saying (a very long time ago) that GC might not fail, but continue in a similar way to the N64.
Anyway, didn't I say that Zelda was doing well, but had doubts about how long it could keep going at that rate. Fair point I thought. What TS said months or weeks ago doesn't effect me or what I have just said (although it appears to effect IB).
So what if Nintendo do produce a "popular" game which sells quicker or more than GTA-VC. I could argue, that it's (along with the £99 GC price tag) too little to late. But I won't go that far (although TS might, but thats not down to me), yet. I also remember saying (a very long time ago) that GC might not fail, but continue in a similar way to the N64.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Since you're still missing the point, I'll spell it out for you:
>
> Ignoring the fanboy "crap" statement, the facts have now
> proven him utterly wrong on his point that the Gamecube cannot perform
> in the market place. Zelda is more anticipated that GTA:VC ever was,
> and if you consider the difference in the size of the respective user
> bases, it's a tremendous feat and points directly to Nintendo's
> reputation as a maker of world class games.
I agree and I hope Top score is reading this.
Despite Gamecube not selling as many units as the PS2 it can still compete in software sales when the right game comes along. Having been a PS2 owner for a while I have seen very few AAA titles come out compared to the Gamecube so there is no reason why the Gamecube should be disrespected in anyway.
> Since you're still missing the point, I'll spell it out for you:
>
> Ignoring the fanboy "crap" statement, the facts have now
> proven him utterly wrong on his point that the Gamecube cannot perform
> in the market place. Zelda is more anticipated that GTA:VC ever was,
> and if you consider the difference in the size of the respective user
> bases, it's a tremendous feat and points directly to Nintendo's
> reputation as a maker of world class games.
I agree and I hope Top score is reading this.
Despite Gamecube not selling as many units as the PS2 it can still compete in software sales when the right game comes along. Having been a PS2 owner for a while I have seen very few AAA titles come out compared to the Gamecube so there is no reason why the Gamecube should be disrespected in anyway.
Methinks Top Score is too humiliated to make an appearance anytime soon.
Since you're still missing the point, I'll spell it out for you:
Top Score, some months ago, created a topic haling the number of pre-orders for GTA:VC saying that the high figures obviously pointed to Sony's superior market position and going on to state (now listen to this bit) that the GameCube would NEVER be able to achieve such a record because it was crap.
Ignoring the fanboy "crap" statement, the facts have now proven him utterly wrong on his point that the Gamecube cannot perform in the market place. Zelda is more anticipated that GTA:VC ever was, and if you consider the difference in the size of the respective user bases, it's a tremendous feat and points directly to Nintendo's reputation as a maker of world class games.
Nobody is arguing that PS2 as a piece of hardware is more popular, so don't bother quoting stupid things like that when they aren't the point of the discussion.
Top Score, some months ago, created a topic haling the number of pre-orders for GTA:VC saying that the high figures obviously pointed to Sony's superior market position and going on to state (now listen to this bit) that the GameCube would NEVER be able to achieve such a record because it was crap.
Ignoring the fanboy "crap" statement, the facts have now proven him utterly wrong on his point that the Gamecube cannot perform in the market place. Zelda is more anticipated that GTA:VC ever was, and if you consider the difference in the size of the respective user bases, it's a tremendous feat and points directly to Nintendo's reputation as a maker of world class games.
Nobody is arguing that PS2 as a piece of hardware is more popular, so don't bother quoting stupid things like that when they aren't the point of the discussion.
Page: