The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I'm not usually one to rub things in peoples faces.
In fact, I hate doing it.
But I could let this oppurtunity pass.
Top Score - A Nintendo franchise outsold the unbeatable Vice City
Yes, flame me all you will, but I'm retardant... Flame Retardant...
In fact, I hate doing it.
But I could let this oppurtunity pass.
Top Score - A Nintendo franchise outsold the unbeatable Vice City
Yes, flame me all you will, but I'm retardant... Flame Retardant...
Page:
A little-bit of this, a little-bit of that. You know how it is :P
I also changed it because I actually like this name. And it describes me perfectly ;)
I also changed it because I actually like this name. And it describes me perfectly ;)
Why have you changed your name?
Rosalind wrote:
Your name offends me.
------------
Now where have I heard that before?...
;)
Your name offends me.
------------
Now where have I heard that before?...
;)
Your name offend me. It insinuates that people with Windows XP are better than people with any other windows operating system.
Thats windowsism that is.
Thats windowsism that is.
Your drowning my son.
As I clearly stated, the tagline is offensive only to those who WANT to find it offensive. Such people are, to me, ignorant oafs, which is my opinion of you right now, as you decided to find offence in something which is otherwise inoffensive.
So, you can complain all you like about it, but your doing little more than urinating into the wind and having it blow back into your face.
Your drowning. I would help you, my son, but you can understand, I'm sure, that I'm not particularly inclined to get my hands wet.
As I clearly stated, the tagline is offensive only to those who WANT to find it offensive. Such people are, to me, ignorant oafs, which is my opinion of you right now, as you decided to find offence in something which is otherwise inoffensive.
So, you can complain all you like about it, but your doing little more than urinating into the wind and having it blow back into your face.
Your drowning. I would help you, my son, but you can understand, I'm sure, that I'm not particularly inclined to get my hands wet.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> It's an anagram of my forum name you utter utter retard. It's nly
> offensive to people who want to take it offensively. I could write
> "fish" in my tagline, and someone could shoose to take it
> offensively.
>
> But let's take the analysis a level further, and say the following:
>
> "An eastern inbred."
>
> To me, and inbred anywhere is as bad as one from anywhere else, and
> eastern could mean east london, or east UK or east asia. However, you
> specifically and immediately intimate eastern countries which implies
> to me that you believe that inbreds only come from eastern countries
> anyway.
>
> This makes you racist, not me.
>
> Now kindly go play with the spaghetti and meat balls dangling between
> your legs and come back when you can form a proper argument, and not
> just try to sling accusations at all and sundry and then try to cover
> yourself up by unveiling "hidden meanings".
>
>
> Mong. Mong. Mong.
Well at least it's an explanation of sorts. But unless you want to keep posting this explanation (for example for all the new people who join this forum who won't know about it), wouldn't it be better to change the line of text under your name?
I would also say that when you try and "lop all East area's together " (ie, east london, or east UK or east asia) it doesn't work well since your saying in effect that anyone in the east of anywhere is the target. Why is East worse than West, South, or North area's? I picked up and suggested "Eastern counties" because of the tense International situation at the moment - which most if not all people are aware of, but I could of easily said East of somewhere else. It was only an example.
> It's an anagram of my forum name you utter utter retard. It's nly
> offensive to people who want to take it offensively. I could write
> "fish" in my tagline, and someone could shoose to take it
> offensively.
>
> But let's take the analysis a level further, and say the following:
>
> "An eastern inbred."
>
> To me, and inbred anywhere is as bad as one from anywhere else, and
> eastern could mean east london, or east UK or east asia. However, you
> specifically and immediately intimate eastern countries which implies
> to me that you believe that inbreds only come from eastern countries
> anyway.
>
> This makes you racist, not me.
>
> Now kindly go play with the spaghetti and meat balls dangling between
> your legs and come back when you can form a proper argument, and not
> just try to sling accusations at all and sundry and then try to cover
> yourself up by unveiling "hidden meanings".
>
>
> Mong. Mong. Mong.
Well at least it's an explanation of sorts. But unless you want to keep posting this explanation (for example for all the new people who join this forum who won't know about it), wouldn't it be better to change the line of text under your name?
I would also say that when you try and "lop all East area's together " (ie, east london, or east UK or east asia) it doesn't work well since your saying in effect that anyone in the east of anywhere is the target. Why is East worse than West, South, or North area's? I picked up and suggested "Eastern counties" because of the tense International situation at the moment - which most if not all people are aware of, but I could of easily said East of somewhere else. It was only an example.
Insane Bartender wrote:
Now kindly go play with the spaghetti and meat balls dangling between your legs...
---------------
My word. Save that one for after-dark, will ya?
;)
Now kindly go play with the spaghetti and meat balls dangling between your legs...
---------------
My word. Save that one for after-dark, will ya?
;)
It's an anagram of my forum name you utter utter retard. It's nly offensive to people who want to take it offensively. I could write "fish" in my tagline, and someone could shoose to take it offensively.
But let's take the analysis a level further, and say the following:
"An eastern inbred."
To me, and inbred anywhere is as bad as one from anywhere else, and eastern could mean east london, or east UK or east asia. However, you specifically and immediately intimate eastern countries which implies to me that you believe that inbreds only come from eastern countries anyway.
This makes you racist, not me.
Now kindly go play with the spaghetti and meat balls dangling between your legs and come back when you can form a proper argument, and not just try to sling accusations at all and sundry and then try to cover yourself up by unveiling "hidden meanings".
Mong. Mong. Mong.
But let's take the analysis a level further, and say the following:
"An eastern inbred."
To me, and inbred anywhere is as bad as one from anywhere else, and eastern could mean east london, or east UK or east asia. However, you specifically and immediately intimate eastern countries which implies to me that you believe that inbreds only come from eastern countries anyway.
This makes you racist, not me.
Now kindly go play with the spaghetti and meat balls dangling between your legs and come back when you can form a proper argument, and not just try to sling accusations at all and sundry and then try to cover yourself up by unveiling "hidden meanings".
Mong. Mong. Mong.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Updated wrote:
> Totally unjust response yet AGAIN! What you write on the screen
> (name,
> tag line, posts, etc) is your responsibility. Even if someone else
> thinks it up - if it's submitted by you - then it's still your
> responsibility. Think before you type. If you don't want other
> people
> to make obvious conclusions about your text - then don't write it in
> the first place. Don't threaten me for reading your text (very peed
> off at this moment).
>
> Your thoughts are your responsibility, not mine.
>
> I've posted nothing racially offensive in any sense whatsoever, and
> you brand me a racist?
>
> And I don't care how "peed" you are, if I were in the same
> room with you right now, I'd caving your head in in response to the
> sheer audacity of calling me a racist because of some vague connection
> between my tagline and world diversity.
>
> Your such a mong, it defies credibility.
I think you will find that I did not state that at all. I wrote that it was suspect (it is), and then I suggested it was a little dig, followed by "any chance?" - Note the question mark there. I wouldn't be so daft as to state some thing like that as a fact - when we are all reading from the screen and may not "get" the context in which is was designed. However, I did catch my eye - and I would suggest to you that if a lot of people saw that wrote in a paper or book, they may also think it suspect. So to avoid such situations, I would suggest you don't write it in the first place.
> Updated wrote:
> Totally unjust response yet AGAIN! What you write on the screen
> (name,
> tag line, posts, etc) is your responsibility. Even if someone else
> thinks it up - if it's submitted by you - then it's still your
> responsibility. Think before you type. If you don't want other
> people
> to make obvious conclusions about your text - then don't write it in
> the first place. Don't threaten me for reading your text (very peed
> off at this moment).
>
> Your thoughts are your responsibility, not mine.
>
> I've posted nothing racially offensive in any sense whatsoever, and
> you brand me a racist?
>
> And I don't care how "peed" you are, if I were in the same
> room with you right now, I'd caving your head in in response to the
> sheer audacity of calling me a racist because of some vague connection
> between my tagline and world diversity.
>
> Your such a mong, it defies credibility.
I think you will find that I did not state that at all. I wrote that it was suspect (it is), and then I suggested it was a little dig, followed by "any chance?" - Note the question mark there. I wouldn't be so daft as to state some thing like that as a fact - when we are all reading from the screen and may not "get" the context in which is was designed. However, I did catch my eye - and I would suggest to you that if a lot of people saw that wrote in a paper or book, they may also think it suspect. So to avoid such situations, I would suggest you don't write it in the first place.
Updated wrote:
> Totally unjust response yet AGAIN! What you write on the screen (name,
> tag line, posts, etc) is your responsibility. Even if someone else
> thinks it up - if it's submitted by you - then it's still your
> responsibility. Think before you type. If you don't want other people
> to make obvious conclusions about your text - then don't write it in
> the first place. Don't threaten me for reading your text (very peed
> off at this moment).
Your thoughts are your responsibility, not mine.
I've posted nothing racially offensive in any sense whatsoever, and you brand me a racist?
And I don't care how "peed" you are, if I were in the same room with you right now, I'd caving your head in in response to the sheer audacity of calling me a racist because of some vague connection between my tagline and world diversity.
Your such a mong, it defies credibility.
> Totally unjust response yet AGAIN! What you write on the screen (name,
> tag line, posts, etc) is your responsibility. Even if someone else
> thinks it up - if it's submitted by you - then it's still your
> responsibility. Think before you type. If you don't want other people
> to make obvious conclusions about your text - then don't write it in
> the first place. Don't threaten me for reading your text (very peed
> off at this moment).
Your thoughts are your responsibility, not mine.
I've posted nothing racially offensive in any sense whatsoever, and you brand me a racist?
And I don't care how "peed" you are, if I were in the same room with you right now, I'd caving your head in in response to the sheer audacity of calling me a racist because of some vague connection between my tagline and world diversity.
Your such a mong, it defies credibility.
Page: